Irreversible investment, uncertainty, and ambiguity: The case of bioenergy sector

被引:5
作者
Jouvet, Pierre-Andre [1 ]
Le Cadre, Elodie [1 ,2 ]
Orset, Caroline [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Ouest Nanterre Def, EconomiX CNRS, Paris, France
[2] UMR INRA AgroParisTech Econ Publ, Paris, France
关键词
Ambiguity; Bioenergy; Irreversible investment; Uncertainty; CAPACITY CHOICE; OPTIONS; MODEL; DECISIONS; TECHNOLOGIES; DEMAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2011.08.018
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We analyze production and investment decisions of an agent in industrial activities that are characterized by two forms of uncertainty: demand uncertainty (in terms of number of buyers) and competitive effect uncertainty (in terms of other energy resource). We apply our model on the bioenergy industries. We compare the case of an ambiguity neutral agent with that of an ambiguity averse agent. We show that the investment decision of an agent depends on the effects of both the capital investment and the level of production on the cost and the uncertainty the agent is confronted with. Moreover, we find that ambiguity aversion tends to decrease the agent's optimal levels of production and investment. Our numerical analysis of the French case illustrates the different effects associated with demand uncertainty and competitive effect uncertainty. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 53
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
ADEME, 2009, GREN ENV FONDS DEM R
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, REAL OPTIONS MANAGER
[3]  
[Anonymous], EN ENV REP 2008
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Energy for Sustainable Development, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0973-0826(08)60520-7
[5]  
Bond Steve, 2005, MICROECONOMETR UNPUB
[6]  
Cairns R.D, 2009, SUNK COST COST UNPUB
[7]  
Camerer C. F., 1999, AMBIGUITY AVERSION N, P53
[8]   What do we knout about investment under uncertainty? [J].
Carruth, A ;
Dickerson, A ;
Henley, A .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2000, 14 (02) :119-153
[9]  
Collier C, 2006, SEM EC THEOR U TOUL
[10]   Investment and capacity choice under uncertain demand [J].
Dangl, T .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1999, 117 (03) :415-428