Climate skepticism decreases when the planet gets hotter and conservative support wanes

被引:20
作者
Hornsey, Matthew J. [1 ]
Chapman, Cassandra M. [1 ]
Humphrey, Jacquelyn E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Business Sch, Joyce Ackroyd Bldg,37 Blair Dr, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
来源
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS | 2022年 / 74卷
关键词
Climate skepticism; Political ideology; Rejection of science; EXTREME WEATHER EVENTS; MOTIVATED REJECTION; RISK PERCEPTIONS; LOCAL WEATHER; TEMPERATURE; EXPERIENCE; BELIEF; POLICY; DETERMINANTS; PARTISANSHIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102492
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Identifying historical patterns of fluctuation in climate change skepticism guides researchers, policy makers, and science communicators in efforts to catalyze change in the future. We analyzed data from 25 nationally representative polls collected in Australia from 2009 to 2019 (N = 20,655). Although it remains concerningly high, climate skepticism trended down in that 10-year period, particularly among conservatives. Multilevel analyses identified two variables that stood out as being relevant in explaining that trajectory. First, climate change skepticism was positively associated with support for conservative political parties in national polls. Second, climate change skepticism was negatively associated with the annual global temperatures the previous year. There was little evidence that climate change beliefs were associated with economic variables or with seasonal variations in temperature. Furthermore, there was only weak evidence that climate change beliefs were associated with national temperatures. This suggests that global temperatures in the previous year are impactful because of their informational value (as a communication heuristic for the urgency and immediacy of climate change) more so than for their experiential value (in the sense of people actually experiencing warmer weather). Importantly, the effect of previous global temperature was particularly pronounced among those with the strongest levels of skepticism: political conservatives. This suggests that rising global annual temperatures have the power to update beliefs among those most in need of converting to the climate cause.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Do people "personally experience" global warming, and if so how, and does it matter? [J].
Akerlof, Karen ;
Maibach, Edward W. ;
Fitzgerald, Dennis ;
Cedeno, Andrew Y. ;
Neuman, Amanda .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2013, 23 (01) :81-91
[2]   Beliefs about climate change in the aftermath of extreme flooding [J].
Albright, Elizabeth A. ;
Crow, Deserai .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2019, 155 (01) :1-17
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, THERE IS PROBLEM GLO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, NBER WORKING PAPER S
[5]   THE UNBEARABLE LIGHTNESS OF POLITICS: Climate Change Denial and Political Polarization [J].
Antonio, Robert J. ;
Brulle, Robert J. .
SOCIOLOGICAL QUARTERLY, 2011, 52 (02) :195-202
[6]  
Bliuc AM, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P226, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2507, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2507]
[7]   Is it hot in here or is it just me? Temperature anomalies and political polarization over global warming in the American public [J].
Bohr, Jeremiah .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2017, 142 (1-2) :271-285
[8]   Event attribution and partisanship shape local discussion of climate change after extreme weather [J].
Boudet, Hilary ;
Giordono, Leanne ;
Zanocco, Chad ;
Satein, Hannah ;
Whitley, Hannah .
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2020, 10 (01) :69-+
[9]   Media discourse on the climate slowdown [J].
Boykoff, Maxwell T. .
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2014, 4 (03) :156-158
[10]  
Brenan M., 2018, Gallup