Rheumatology: the expectations and preferences of patients for their follow-up monitoring care: a qualitative study to determine the dimensions of patient satisfaction

被引:23
作者
Arthur, V
Clifford, C
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Trust, Selly Oak Hosp, Dept Rheumatol, Birmingham B29 6JD, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Sch Hlth Sci, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
expectations; interviews; patient satisfaction; primary care; rheumatoid arthritis; secondary care;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00873.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background. Patient satisfaction has rarely been defined. It is a multi-dimensional concept and relates to expectations and preferences for care. This paper reports the findings of a study to determine the expectations and preferences of rheumatology patients for their follow-up monitoring care. Aims and objectives. To identify the dimensions of satisfaction important to rheumatology patients in the provision of their care in two locations; primary and secondary. The objectives were to determine the expectations and preferences of this group and to gather data to inform a larger study of patient satisfaction. Design. This small qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with a convenient sample of 10 patients; five from each location. Methods. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Qualitative data analysis revealed a framework and conceptual categories. Results. Empathy, specialism, information provision, technical aspects, time, and continuity of care were identified as being important in the provision of care for this group of patients. Conclusions. These categories had already been found in a validated questionnaire and justified the use of this tool in the larger comparative study. Relevance to clinical practice. Patient satisfaction cannot be accurately assessed unless important categories of care are identified and used in the measurement tool.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 242
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Arthur V, 1995, Br J Nurs, V4, P616
  • [2] ARTHUR V, 2004, IN PRESS J CLIN NURS, V13
  • [3] Avis M, 1995, J Nurs Manag, V3, P59, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2834.1995.tb00082.x
  • [4] Bendtsen P, 1993, Qual Assur Health Care, V5, P243
  • [5] Bowling A, 1992, Nurs Times, V88, P31
  • [6] *BRIT SOC RHEUM, 1995, GUID 2 LIN MON
  • [7] CARRHILL RA, 1992, J PUBLIC HEALTH MED, V14, P236
  • [8] CLIFFORD C, 1997, NURSING HLTH CARE RE, P120
  • [9] Department of Health, 1998, 1 CLASS SERV QUAL NE
  • [10] Rating satisfaction research:: Is it □ poor, □ fair, □ good, □ very good, or □ excellent?
    Di Palo, MT
    [J]. ARTHRITIS CARE AND RESEARCH, 1997, 10 (06): : 422 - 430