The implications for households of environmental tax reform (ETR) in Europe

被引:43
作者
Ekins, Paul [1 ]
Pollitt, Hector [1 ]
Barton, Jennifer [1 ]
Blobel, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, UCL Energy Inst, London WC1H 0NN, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Environmental tax reform; Distributional impacts; European Union; Econometric modelling; ENERGY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.08.004
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The paper discusses the distributional implications of environmental tax reform (ETR) for households, and presents new results from modelling the impacts of a major ETR for the European Union. The distributional effects arise from the new environmental taxes, any tax reductions made as part of the ETR, the wider macroeconomic impacts from the ETR, any special provisions in the ETR, and the environmental benefits from the ETR. The paper's literature review makes clear that while the impacts from taxes on the household use of energy are very often regressive, transport taxes tend not to be, although the impacts differ between urban and rural households. Moreover, the net distributional impact is often less regressive, or not at all, once the wider distributional effects are taken into account. Residual regressive effects can in principle be removed by further adjustments in the tax or benefits system. The modelling results suggest that an ETR in Europe will actually increase real incomes across the EU as a whole, and will not be generally regressive, although the results differ by country and for different socio-economic groups. The political acceptability of ETR may depend on the worst effects on these groups being mitigated in some way. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2472 / 2485
页数:14
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Andersen M. S., 2009, CARBON TAXATION LESS
[2]  
[Anonymous], EC WIDE MAT FLOW ACC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, WORLD EN OUTL 2008
[4]  
[Anonymous], USE EC INSTRUMENTS N
[5]  
[Anonymous], C INT EN EXP MARK RE
[6]  
[Anonymous], LINKS SOCIAL ENV PIL
[7]   The effects of environmental fiscal reform in Germany: a simulation study [J].
Bach, S ;
Kohlhaas, M ;
Meyer, B ;
Praetorius, B ;
Welsch, H .
ENERGY POLICY, 2002, 30 (09) :803-811
[8]  
BACH S, 2001, OKOLOGISCHE STEUERRE
[9]  
BACH S, 2009, 142009 DIW, P218
[10]  
BACH S, 2005, BE UND ENTLASTUNGSWI, V1