Six months follow-up of protected high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the microaxial Impella pump: results from the German Impella registry

被引:13
作者
Baumann, Stefan [1 ,2 ]
Werner, Nikos [3 ]
Al-Rashid, Fadi [4 ]
Schaefer, Andreas [5 ]
Bauer, Timm [6 ]
Sotoudeh, Ramin [7 ]
Bojara, Waldemar [7 ]
Shamekhi, Jasmin [3 ]
Sinning, Jan-Malte [3 ]
Becher, Tobias [1 ,2 ]
Eder, Frederik [1 ,2 ]
Akin, Ibrahim [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Mannheim, Dept Med Cardiol 1, Mannheim, Germany
[2] DZHK German Ctr Cardiovasc Res, Partner Site Heidelberg Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
[3] Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms Univ, Dept Internal Med 2, Bonn, Germany
[4] Univ Duisburg Essen, Essen Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol & Vasc Med, West German Heart & Vasc Ctr Essen, Essen, Germany
[5] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Cardiol & Angiol, Hannover, Germany
[6] Univ Clin Giessen, Dept Cardiol, Giessen, Germany
[7] Hosp Fdn Mittelrhein, Dept Internal Med Cardiol, Koblenz, Germany
关键词
hemodynamic support; Impella; protected percutaneous coronary intervention; ventricular assist device; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON PUMP; CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS; BYPASS-SURGERY; ASSIST DEVICE; SUPPORT; PREDICTION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1097/MCA.0000000000000824
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) represents an important alternative to coronary bypass surgery for the treatment of patients with complex coronary artery disease and high perioperative risk. Protected percutaneous coronary intervention applies temporary percutaneous ventricular assist devices to mitigate potential hemodynamic compromise in high-risk patients. The Impella system is currently the most commonly used device for protected percutaneous coronary intervention and showed improved hemodynamic parameters in earlier trials. Methods: This study was designed as a retrospective, observational multi-center registry conducted in ten hospitals in Germany. We included consecutive patients undergoing protected high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with Impella support. The primary endpoint was defined as the occurrence of a major adverse cardiac event defined as all-cause mortality, ST-elevation myocardial infarction, or stroke during a postprocedural 180-day follow-up period. Results: In total, 157 patients (80.3% male; mean age 71.8 +/- 10.8 years) were included in the present study, and 180-day follow-up was complete for 149 patients (94.9%). At baseline, the patients had a median left ventricular ejection fraction of 39.0% (interquartile range, 25.0-50.0%). The median SYNergy between PCI with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery-Score I was 33.0 (interquartile range, 24.0-40.5) and the median EuroSCORE II was 7.2% (interquartile range, 3.2-17.1%). During postprocedural follow-up, 34 patients (22.8%) suffered a major adverse cardiac event. All-cause mortality was 18.1% (27 patients). Nine patients (6.0%) sustained a ST-elevation myocardial infarction, while 4 patients (2.7%) had a stroke. Conclusions: Patients undergoing protected high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with Impella support showed an acceptable 180-day clinical outcome regarding major adverse cardiac event and mortality.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 242
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Left ventricular support with Impella for high risk percutaneous coronary intervention. The demonstration of the hemodynamic benefit in daily practice
    Antoni Gomez-Hospital, Joan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 274 : 254 - 256
  • [2] Indication and short-term clinical outcomes of high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with microaxial ImpellaA® pump: results from the German ImpellaA® registry
    Baumann, Stefan
    Werner, Nikos
    Ibrahim, Karim
    Westenfeld, Ralf
    Al-Rashid, Fadi
    Sinning, Jan-Malte
    Westermann, Dirk
    Schaefer, Andreas
    Karatolios, Konstantinos
    Bauer, Timm
    Becher, Tobias
    Akin, Ibrahim
    [J]. CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 107 (08) : 653 - 657
  • [3] Unprotected versus protected high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the Impella 2.5 in patients with multivessel disease and severely reduced left ventricular function
    Becher, Tobias
    Eder, Frederik
    Baumann, Stefan
    Lossnitzer, Dirk
    Pollmann, Berit
    Behnes, Michael
    Borggrefe, Martin
    Akin, Ibrahim
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (43)
  • [4] Comparison of peri and post-procedural complications in patients undergoing revascularisation of coronary artery multivessel disease by coronary artery bypass grafting or protected percutaneous coronary intervention with the Impella 2.5 device
    Becher, Tobias
    Baumann, Stefan
    Eder, Frederik
    Perschka, Simon
    Lossnitzer, Dirk
    Fastner, Christian
    Behnes, Michael
    Doesch, Christina
    Borggrefe, Martin
    Akin, Ibrahim
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE, 2019, 8 (04) : 360 - 368
  • [5] Description of a Heart Team approach to coronary revascularization and its beneficial long-term effect on clinical events after PCI
    Bonzel, Tassilo
    Schaechinger, Volker
    Doerge, Hilmar
    [J]. CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 105 (05) : 388 - 400
  • [6] Impella ventricular support in clinical practice: Collaborative viewpoint from a European expert user group
    Burzotta, Francesco
    Trani, Carlo
    Doshi, Sagar N.
    Townend, Jonathan
    van Geuns, Robert Jan
    Hunziker, Patrick
    Schieffer, Bernhard
    Karatolios, Konstantinos
    Moller, Jacob Eifer
    Ribichini, Flavio L.
    Schaefer, Andreas
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 201 : 684 - 691
  • [7] Percutaneous left ventricular assist device for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions: Real-world versus clinical trial experience
    Cohen, Mauricio G.
    Matthews, Ray
    Maini, Brij
    Dixon, Simon
    Vetrovec, George
    Wohns, David
    Palacios, Igor
    Popma, Jeffrey
    Ohman, E. Magnus
    Schreiber, Theodore
    O'Neill, William W.
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 170 (05) : 872 - 879
  • [8] Impact of Hemodynamic Support With Impella 2.5 Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump on Prognostically Important Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (from the PROTECT II Randomized Trial)
    Dangas, George D.
    Kini, Annapoorna S.
    Sharma, Samin K.
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    Claessen, Bimmer E.
    Dixon, Simon R.
    Massaro, Joseph M.
    Palacios, Igor
    Popma, Jeffrey J.
    Ohman, E. Magnus
    Stone, Gregg W.
    O'Neill, William W.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 113 (02) : 222 - 228
  • [9] A Prospective Feasibility Trial Investigating the Use of the Impel la 2.5 System in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (The PROTECT I Trial) Initial US Experience
    Dixon, Simon R.
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    Mauri, Laura
    Sjauw, Krischan
    Civitello, Andrew
    Kar, Biswajit
    Loyalka, Pranav
    Resnic, Frederic S.
    Teirstein, Paul
    Makkar, Raj
    Palacios, Igor F.
    Collins, Michael
    Moses, Jeffrey
    Benali, Karim
    O'Neill, William W.
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2009, 2 (02) : 91 - 96
  • [10] Anatomical and clinical characteristics to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for individual patients: development and validation of SYNTAX score II
    Farooq, Vasim
    van Klaveren, David
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Meliga, Emanuele
    Vergouwe, Yvonne
    Chieffo, Alaide
    Kappetein, Arie Pieter
    Colombo, Antonio
    Holmes, David R., Jr.
    Mack, Michael
    Feldman, Ted
    Morice, Marie-Claude
    Stahle, Elisabeth
    Onuma, Yoshinobu
    Morel, Marie-angele
    Garcia-Garcia, Hector M.
    van Es, Gerrit Anne
    Dawkins, Keith D.
    Mohr, Friedrich W.
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    [J]. LANCET, 2013, 381 (9867) : 639 - 650