Six months follow-up of protected high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the microaxial Impella pump: results from the German Impella registry

被引:14
作者
Baumann, Stefan [1 ,2 ]
Werner, Nikos [3 ]
Al-Rashid, Fadi [4 ]
Schaefer, Andreas [5 ]
Bauer, Timm [6 ]
Sotoudeh, Ramin [7 ]
Bojara, Waldemar [7 ]
Shamekhi, Jasmin [3 ]
Sinning, Jan-Malte [3 ]
Becher, Tobias [1 ,2 ]
Eder, Frederik [1 ,2 ]
Akin, Ibrahim [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Mannheim, Dept Med Cardiol 1, Mannheim, Germany
[2] DZHK German Ctr Cardiovasc Res, Partner Site Heidelberg Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
[3] Rheinische Friedrich Wilhelms Univ, Dept Internal Med 2, Bonn, Germany
[4] Univ Duisburg Essen, Essen Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol & Vasc Med, West German Heart & Vasc Ctr Essen, Essen, Germany
[5] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Cardiol & Angiol, Hannover, Germany
[6] Univ Clin Giessen, Dept Cardiol, Giessen, Germany
[7] Hosp Fdn Mittelrhein, Dept Internal Med Cardiol, Koblenz, Germany
关键词
hemodynamic support; Impella; protected percutaneous coronary intervention; ventricular assist device; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON PUMP; CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS; BYPASS-SURGERY; ASSIST DEVICE; SUPPORT; PREDICTION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1097/MCA.0000000000000824
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) represents an important alternative to coronary bypass surgery for the treatment of patients with complex coronary artery disease and high perioperative risk. Protected percutaneous coronary intervention applies temporary percutaneous ventricular assist devices to mitigate potential hemodynamic compromise in high-risk patients. The Impella system is currently the most commonly used device for protected percutaneous coronary intervention and showed improved hemodynamic parameters in earlier trials. Methods: This study was designed as a retrospective, observational multi-center registry conducted in ten hospitals in Germany. We included consecutive patients undergoing protected high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with Impella support. The primary endpoint was defined as the occurrence of a major adverse cardiac event defined as all-cause mortality, ST-elevation myocardial infarction, or stroke during a postprocedural 180-day follow-up period. Results: In total, 157 patients (80.3% male; mean age 71.8 +/- 10.8 years) were included in the present study, and 180-day follow-up was complete for 149 patients (94.9%). At baseline, the patients had a median left ventricular ejection fraction of 39.0% (interquartile range, 25.0-50.0%). The median SYNergy between PCI with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery-Score I was 33.0 (interquartile range, 24.0-40.5) and the median EuroSCORE II was 7.2% (interquartile range, 3.2-17.1%). During postprocedural follow-up, 34 patients (22.8%) suffered a major adverse cardiac event. All-cause mortality was 18.1% (27 patients). Nine patients (6.0%) sustained a ST-elevation myocardial infarction, while 4 patients (2.7%) had a stroke. Conclusions: Patients undergoing protected high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with Impella support showed an acceptable 180-day clinical outcome regarding major adverse cardiac event and mortality.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 242
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Left ventricular support with Impella for high risk percutaneous coronary intervention. The demonstration of the hemodynamic benefit in daily practice [J].
Antoni Gomez-Hospital, Joan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 274 :254-256
[2]   Indication and short-term clinical outcomes of high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with microaxial ImpellaA® pump: results from the German ImpellaA® registry [J].
Baumann, Stefan ;
Werner, Nikos ;
Ibrahim, Karim ;
Westenfeld, Ralf ;
Al-Rashid, Fadi ;
Sinning, Jan-Malte ;
Westermann, Dirk ;
Schaefer, Andreas ;
Karatolios, Konstantinos ;
Bauer, Timm ;
Becher, Tobias ;
Akin, Ibrahim .
CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 107 (08) :653-657
[3]   Unprotected versus protected high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the Impella 2.5 in patients with multivessel disease and severely reduced left ventricular function [J].
Becher, Tobias ;
Eder, Frederik ;
Baumann, Stefan ;
Lossnitzer, Dirk ;
Pollmann, Berit ;
Behnes, Michael ;
Borggrefe, Martin ;
Akin, Ibrahim .
MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (43)
[4]   Comparison of peri and post-procedural complications in patients undergoing revascularisation of coronary artery multivessel disease by coronary artery bypass grafting or protected percutaneous coronary intervention with the Impella 2.5 device [J].
Becher, Tobias ;
Baumann, Stefan ;
Eder, Frederik ;
Perschka, Simon ;
Lossnitzer, Dirk ;
Fastner, Christian ;
Behnes, Michael ;
Doesch, Christina ;
Borggrefe, Martin ;
Akin, Ibrahim .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE, 2019, 8 (04) :360-368
[5]   Description of a Heart Team approach to coronary revascularization and its beneficial long-term effect on clinical events after PCI [J].
Bonzel, Tassilo ;
Schaechinger, Volker ;
Doerge, Hilmar .
CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 105 (05) :388-400
[6]   Impella ventricular support in clinical practice: Collaborative viewpoint from a European expert user group [J].
Burzotta, Francesco ;
Trani, Carlo ;
Doshi, Sagar N. ;
Townend, Jonathan ;
van Geuns, Robert Jan ;
Hunziker, Patrick ;
Schieffer, Bernhard ;
Karatolios, Konstantinos ;
Moller, Jacob Eifer ;
Ribichini, Flavio L. ;
Schaefer, Andreas ;
Henriques, Jose P. S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 201 :684-691
[7]   Percutaneous left ventricular assist device for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions: Real-world versus clinical trial experience [J].
Cohen, Mauricio G. ;
Matthews, Ray ;
Maini, Brij ;
Dixon, Simon ;
Vetrovec, George ;
Wohns, David ;
Palacios, Igor ;
Popma, Jeffrey ;
Ohman, E. Magnus ;
Schreiber, Theodore ;
O'Neill, William W. .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 170 (05) :872-879
[8]   Impact of Hemodynamic Support With Impella 2.5 Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump on Prognostically Important Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (from the PROTECT II Randomized Trial) [J].
Dangas, George D. ;
Kini, Annapoorna S. ;
Sharma, Samin K. ;
Henriques, Jose P. S. ;
Claessen, Bimmer E. ;
Dixon, Simon R. ;
Massaro, Joseph M. ;
Palacios, Igor ;
Popma, Jeffrey J. ;
Ohman, E. Magnus ;
Stone, Gregg W. ;
O'Neill, William W. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 113 (02) :222-228
[9]   A Prospective Feasibility Trial Investigating the Use of the Impel la 2.5 System in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (The PROTECT I Trial) Initial US Experience [J].
Dixon, Simon R. ;
Henriques, Jose P. S. ;
Mauri, Laura ;
Sjauw, Krischan ;
Civitello, Andrew ;
Kar, Biswajit ;
Loyalka, Pranav ;
Resnic, Frederic S. ;
Teirstein, Paul ;
Makkar, Raj ;
Palacios, Igor F. ;
Collins, Michael ;
Moses, Jeffrey ;
Benali, Karim ;
O'Neill, William W. .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2009, 2 (02) :91-96
[10]   Anatomical and clinical characteristics to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for individual patients: development and validation of SYNTAX score II [J].
Farooq, Vasim ;
van Klaveren, David ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. ;
Meliga, Emanuele ;
Vergouwe, Yvonne ;
Chieffo, Alaide ;
Kappetein, Arie Pieter ;
Colombo, Antonio ;
Holmes, David R., Jr. ;
Mack, Michael ;
Feldman, Ted ;
Morice, Marie-Claude ;
Stahle, Elisabeth ;
Onuma, Yoshinobu ;
Morel, Marie-angele ;
Garcia-Garcia, Hector M. ;
van Es, Gerrit Anne ;
Dawkins, Keith D. ;
Mohr, Friedrich W. ;
Serruys, Patrick W. .
LANCET, 2013, 381 (9867) :639-650