Evaluation of Five Gas Diffusion Models Used in the Gradient Method for Estimating CO2 Flux with Changing Soil Properties

被引:3
作者
Yan, Xiaofei [1 ]
Guo, Qinxin [1 ]
Zhao, Yajie [1 ]
Zhao, Yandong [1 ]
Lin, Jianhui [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Forestry Univ, Sch Technol, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
CO2; flux; diffusion model; the gradient method; soil respiration; EDDY COVARIANCE; EFFLUX; CARBON; FOREST; PERMEABILITY; RESPIRATION; VARIABILITY; ACCURACY; CHAMBER;
D O I
10.3390/su131910874
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The gradient method used to estimate soil CO2 flux is distinctive because it can provide additional information about CO2 production and consumption of soil profile. However, choosing an appropriate gas diffusion model with confidence with the gradient method is a big challenge. There is no universal optimal diffusion model but only the most suitable model in specific soils. This paper evaluates the applicability of five commonly used diffusion models in laboratory with changing soil properties and in a forest farm, respectively. When soil moisture, bulk density and fertility status were changed in the laboratory, the applicability of the five diffusion models was discussed. Moreover, this paper shows diurnal variation of soil CO2 flux estimated by the gradient method under four different climatic conditions in the forest farm, and the applicability of the five models was also analyzed. Both laboratory and forest experimental results confirm that the estimating accuracy of the Moldrup model is the highest, followed by the Millington-Quirk model, while those of the Penman, Marshall and Penman-Millington-Quirk models are poor. Furthermore, the results indicate that soil CO2 flux estimated by the gradient method is highly sensitive to the diffusion model and insensitive to the changes of soil properties. In general, the gradient method can be used as a practical, cost-effective tool to study soil respiration only when the appropriate diffusion model is first determined.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [31] Effect of water table drawdown on northern peatland methane dynamics: Implications for climate change
    Strack, M
    Waddington, JM
    Tuittila, ES
    [J]. GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 2004, 18 (04) : 1 - 7
  • [32] Evaluation of methods for estimating soil carbon dioxide efflux across a gradient of forest disturbance
    Sullivan, B. W.
    Dore, S.
    Kolb, T. E.
    Hart, S. C.
    Montes-Helu, M. C.
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2010, 16 (09) : 2449 - 2460
  • [33] Simulated erosion using soils from vegetated slopes in the Jiufeng Mountains, China
    Sun, Jiamei
    Yu, Xinxiao
    Li, Hanzhi
    Chang, Yu
    Wang, Henian
    Tu, Zhihua
    Liang, Hongru
    [J]. CATENA, 2016, 136 : 128 - 134
  • [34] [谭炯锐 TAN Jiongrui], 2009, [生态环境学报, Ecology and Environmental Sciences], V18, P2308
  • [35] Assessing soil CO2 efflux using continuous measurements of CO2 profiles in soils with small solid-state sensors
    Tang, JW
    Baldocchi, DD
    Qi, Y
    Xu, LK
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2003, 118 (3-4) : 207 - 220
  • [36] Environmental controls and the influence of vegetation type, fine roots and rhizomorphs on diel and seasonal variation in soil respiration
    Vargas, Rodrigo
    Allen, Michael F.
    [J]. NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2008, 179 (02) : 460 - 471
  • [37] [王超 Wang Chao], 2011, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V31, P5711
  • [38] Wang T.L, 2017, LAND GREEN, V9, P4
  • [39] CO2 flux of soil respiration in natural recovering karst abandoned farmland in Southwest China
    Wang, Yanwei
    Luo, Weijun
    Zeng, Guangneng
    Yang, Hanling
    Wang, Meifang
    Lyu, Yina
    Cheng, Anyun
    Zhang, Lin
    Cai, Xianli
    Chen, Jia
    Wang, Shijie
    [J]. ACTA GEOCHIMICA, 2020, 39 (04) : 527 - 538
  • [40] Applicability of the soil gradient method for estimating soil-atmosphere CO2, CH4, and N2O fluxes for steppe soils in Inner Mongolia
    Wolf, Benjamin
    Chen, Weiwei
    Brueggemann, Nicolas
    Zheng, Xunhua
    Pumpanen, Jukka
    Butterbach-Bahl, Klaus
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2011, 174 (03) : 359 - 372