Methods of epidemiology: Evaluating the fat-breast cancer hypothesis - Comparing dietary instruments and other developments

被引:13
作者
Freedman, Laurence S. [4 ]
Kipnis, Victor [1 ]
Schatzkin, Arthur [2 ]
Potischman, Nancy [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Inst, Div Canc Prevent, Bethesda, MD USA
[2] Natl Canc Inst, Div Canc Epidemiol & Genet, Bethesda, MD USA
[3] Natl Canc Inst, Div Canc Control & Populat Studies, Bethesda, MD USA
[4] Chaim Sheba Med Ctr, Inst Epidemiol & Hlth Policy Res, Biostat Unit, IL-52161 Tel Hashomer, Israel
关键词
breast cancer; dietary fat; dietary measurement error; food frequency questionnaire; multiple-day food record;
D O I
10.1097/PPO.0b013e31816a5e02
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Results from several large cohort studies that were reported 10 to 20 years ago seemed to indicate that the hypothesized link between dietary fat intake and breast cancer risk was illusory. In this article, we review several strands of more recent evidence that have emerged. These include two studies comparing the performance of dietary instruments used to investigate the dietary fat-breast cancer hypothesis, a large randomized disease prevention trial, a more recent meta-analysis of nutritional cohort studies, and a very large nutritional cohort study. Each of the studies discussed in this article suggests that a modest but real association between fat intake and breast cancer is likely. If the association is causative, it would have important implications for public health strategies in reducing breast cancer incidence. The evidence is not yet conclusive, but additional follow-up in the randomized trial, as well as efforts to improve dietary assessment methodology for cohort studies, may be sufficient to provide a convincing answer.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 74
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Anderson G, 1998, CONTROL CLIN TRIALS, V19, P61
[2]   Are imprecise methods obscuring a relation between fat and breast cancer? [J].
Bingham, SA ;
Luben, R ;
Welch, A ;
Wareham, N ;
Khaw, KT ;
Day, N .
LANCET, 2003, 362 (9379) :212-214
[3]   Dietary fat and breast cancer risk revisited: a meta-analysis of the published literature [J].
Boyd, NF ;
Stone, J ;
Vogt, KN ;
Connelly, BS ;
Martin, LJ ;
Minkin, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 89 (09) :1672-1685
[4]  
Carroll J., 2006, MEASUREMENT ERROR NO, V2nd edn
[5]   Epidemiological assessment of diet: a comparison of a 7-day diary with a food frequency questionnaire using urinary markers of nitrogen, potassium and sodium [J].
Day, NE ;
McKeown, N ;
Wong, MY ;
Welch, A ;
Bingham, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 30 (02) :309-317
[6]   A comparison of two dietary instruments for evaluating the fat-breast cancer relationship [J].
Freedman, Laurence S. ;
Potischman, Nancy ;
Kipnis, Victor ;
Midthune, Douglas ;
Schatzkin, Arthur ;
Thompson, Frances E. ;
Troiano, Richard P. ;
Prentice, Ross ;
Patterson, Ruth ;
Carroll, Raymond ;
Subar, Amy F. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 35 (04) :1011-1021
[7]   THE PROBLEM OF PROFOUND MISMEASUREMENT AND THE POWER OF EPIDEMIOLOGICAL-STUDIES OF DIET AND CANCER [J].
FREUDENHEIM, JL ;
MARSHALL, JR .
NUTRITION AND CANCER-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 1988, 11 (04) :243-250
[8]   The Women's Health Initiative recruitment methods and results [J].
Hays, J ;
Hunt, JR ;
Hubbell, FA ;
Anderson, GL ;
Limacher, M ;
Allen, C ;
Rossouw, JE .
ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (09) :S18-S77
[9]   A GENERALIZATION OF SAMPLING WITHOUT REPLACEMENT FROM A FINITE UNIVERSE [J].
HORVITZ, DG ;
THOMPSON, DJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1952, 47 (260) :663-685
[10]   DIETARY FACTORS AND RISK OF BREAST-CANCER - COMBINED ANALYSIS OF 12 CASE CONTROL STUDIES [J].
HOWE, GR ;
HIROHATA, T ;
HISLOP, TG ;
ISCOVICH, JM ;
YUAN, JM ;
KATSOUYANNI, K ;
LUBIN, F ;
MARUBINI, E ;
MODAN, B ;
ROHAN, T ;
TONIOLO, P ;
SHUNZHANG, Y .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1990, 82 (07) :561-569