The Effectiveness of Environmental Monitoring and Enforcement: A Review of the Empirical Evidence

被引:263
作者
Gray, Wayne B. [1 ]
Shimshack, Jay P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Clark Univ, Dept Econ, Worcester, MA 01610 USA
[2] Tulane Univ, Dept Econ, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
关键词
REGULATORY ENFORCEMENT; PAPER-INDUSTRY; POLLUTION; INSPECTIONS; PERFORMANCE; OSHA; PUNISHMENT; MOTIVATIONS; VIOLATIONS; LIABILITY;
D O I
10.1093/reep/req017
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Regulatory punishment for pollution violations is a mainstay of nearly every industrialized nation's environmental policy. This article reviews the existing empirical evidence on the impacts of environmental monitoring and enforcement actions. We first provide context by investigating the U.S. regulatory setting. We then briefly discuss how economists think about environmental enforcement. We next consider recent empirical evidence linking regulator actions to subsequent pollution discharges and compliance behavior. Since the literature primarily studies U.S. institutions, our review focuses mainly on the effects of Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. state activities. The consistent findings from this literature review are as follows: (1) environmental monitoring and enforcement activities generate substantial specific deterrence, reducing future violations at the targeted firm; (2) environmental monitoring and enforcement activities generate substantial general deterrence, reducing future violations at facilities other than the targeted one; and (3) environmental monitoring and enforcement activities generate not only reductions in violations but also significant reductions in emissions. We conclude by discussing policy implications and identifying gaps in the current state of knowledge.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 24
页数:22
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Strict liability as a deterrent in toxic waste management: Empirical evidence from accident and spill data [J].
Alberini, A ;
Austin, DH .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1999, 38 (01) :20-48
[2]   Accidents waiting to happen: Liability policy and toxic pollution releases [J].
Alberini, A ;
Austin, D .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2002, 84 (04) :729-741
[3]   Environmental Crime and Punishment: Empirical Evidence from the German Penal Code [J].
Almer, Christian ;
Goeschl, Timo .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2010, 86 (04) :707-726
[4]  
Andreoni J, 1998, J ECON LIT, V36, P818
[5]  
[Anonymous], GEN DETERRENCE ENV V
[6]   CRIME AND PUNISHMENT - ECONOMIC APPROACH [J].
BECKER, GS .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1968, 76 (02) :169-217
[7]  
Cohen M.A., 1999, International Yearbook of Environmental Resource Economics, V3, P44
[8]   Inspections, pollution prices, and environmental performance: evidence from China [J].
Dasgupta, S ;
Laplante, B ;
Mamingi, N ;
Wang, H .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 36 (03) :487-498
[9]   Corporate environmentalism and environmental statutory permitting [J].
Decker, CS .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 2003, 46 (01) :103-129
[10]   Agency structure and firm culture: OSHA, EPA, and the steel industry [J].
Deily, Mary E. ;
Gray, Wayne B. .
JOURNAL OF LAW ECONOMICS & ORGANIZATION, 2007, 23 (03) :685-709