Evaluation of two evidence-based decision aids for female BRCA1/2 mutation carriers in Germany: study protocol for a randomised controlled parallel-group trial

被引:11
作者
Kautz-Freimuth, Sibylle [1 ]
Redaelli, Marcus [1 ]
Isselhard, Anna [1 ]
Shukri, Arim [1 ]
Vodermaier, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
Rhiem, Kerstin [3 ,4 ]
Schmutzler, Rita [3 ,4 ]
Stock, Stephanie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Cologne, Inst Hlth Econ & Clin Epidemiol, Gleueler Str 176-178, D-50935 Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ British Columbia, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, BC C6T 1Z3, Canada
[3] Univ Cologne, Ctr Integrated Oncol CIO, Fac Med, Ctr Familial Breast & Ovarian Canc, Kerpener Str 62, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
[4] Univ Cologne, Univ Hosp Cologne, Kerpener Str 62, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
关键词
BRCA1; mutation; BRCA2; Decision aid; Decision-making; Evaluation study; Familial breast and ovarian cancer; Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC); Preventive measures; Preference-sensitive decisions; Patient-centred care; REDUCING SALPINGO-OOPHORECTOMY; BREAST-CANCER PREVENTION; OVARIAN-CANCER; WOMEN; RISK; IMPACT; CONFLICT; SURGERY; METAANALYSIS; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-022-06081-7
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Women with BRCA1/2 mutations have a higher risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer compared to women of the general population. Various preventive options are available to deal with the increased risk of developing cancer. These include intensified breast cancer screening and risk-reducing bilateral mastectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy. The choice of a preventive option can lead to increased decisional conflict. To support these women in their decision-making process, two evidence-based decision aids were developed in an upstream research process and adapted to the German healthcare context. These will be evaluated within a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in terms of their effects on decision-making, women's level of information and psychological outcome variables. Methods: A sample of 310 women carrying BRCA1/2 mutations (A) without a history of cancer or (B) with a history of unilateral breast cancer who have received post-test genetic counselling will be enrolled. Upon study consent, women will be randomly assigned to either the intervention or the control group. All participants will receive standard care including a physician's letter summarising the counselling content. After baseline data collection (t0), the intervention group receives the respective decision aid while the control group receives standard care only. The primary outcome variable assessed at a 3-month follow-up (t1) is the change of extent in decisional conflict (measured with the Decisional Conflict Scale). Secondary outcome variables comprise the stage of decision-making, self-reported symptoms of anxiety, depression and stress due to the genetic test result, and knowledge regarding cancer risks and preventive options. At t1, the extent of preparation for decision-making and acceptability of the decision aids will also be examined. Another secondary outcome variable assessed at 6-month follow-up (t2) is the extent of decision regret. Discussion: These will be the first decision aids available for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers in Germany to be evaluated regarding their effectiveness and acceptability in clinical use within an RCT. Subsequently, they are to be integrated into the care concept of the centres of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and the affiliated breast centres.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] AGO Breast Committee, 2020, DIAGN TREATM PAT EAR, V1, P2020
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2020, DTSCH KONSORTIUM FAM
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, Contin. Updat. Proj. Expert Rep, P120, DOI DOI 10.1007/S12082-007-0105-4
  • [4] Individualized survival curves improve satisfaction with cancer risk management decisions in women with BRCA1/2 mutations
    Armstrong, K
    Weber, B
    Ubel, PA
    Peters, N
    Holmes, J
    Schwartz, JS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (36) : 9319 - 9328
  • [5] Validation of a Preparation for Decision Making scale
    Bennett, Carol
    Graham, Ian D.
    Kristjansson, Elizabeth
    Kearing, Stephen A.
    Clay, Kate F.
    O'Connor, Annette M.
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2010, 78 (01) : 130 - 133
  • [6] High-risk breast cancer surveillance with MRI: 10-year experience from the German consortium for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer
    Bick, Ulrich
    Engel, Christoph
    Krug, Barbara
    Heindel, Walter
    Fallenberg, Eva M.
    Rhiem, Kerstin
    Maintz, David
    Golatta, Michael
    Speiser, Dorothee
    Rjosk-Dendorfer, Dorothea
    Laemmer-Skarke, Irina
    Dietzel, Frederic
    Schaefer, Karl Werner Fritz
    Leinert, Elena
    Weigel, Stefanie
    Sauer, Stephanie
    Pertschy, Stefanie
    Hofmockel, Thomas
    Hagert-Winkler, Anne
    Kast, Karin
    Quante, Anne
    Meindl, Alfons
    Kiechle, Marion
    Loeffler, Markus
    Schmutzler, Rita K.
    Blohmer, Jens-Uwe
    Horn, Denise
    Varon-Mateeva, Raymonda
    Huebbel, Verena
    Herold, Natalie
    Puesken, Michael
    Wimberger, Pauline
    Meisel, Cornelia
    Keller, Katja
    Antoch, Gerald
    Vesper, Anne-Sophie
    Fehm, Tanja N.
    Schlegelberger, Brigitte
    Auber, Bernd
    Wallaschek, Hannah
    Heil, Joerg
    Schott, Sarah
    Dikow, Nicola
    Mundhenke, Christoph
    Arnold, Norbert
    Caliebe, Almuth
    Briest, Susanne
    Lemke, Johannes
    Gril, Sabine
    Pfeifer, Katharina
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2019, 175 (01) : 217 - 228
  • [7] Validation of a decision regret scale
    Brehaut, JC
    O'Connor, AM
    Wood, TJ
    Hack, TF
    Siminoff, L
    Gordon, E
    Feldman-Stewart, D
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2003, 23 (04) : 281 - 292
  • [8] Buchholz A., 2011, Klin Diagn Eval, V4, P15
  • [9] Buchholz A., 2011, Klin Diagn Eval, V4, P31
  • [10] Effect of Screening on Ovarian Cancer Mortality The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Randomized Controlled Trial
    Buys, Saundra S.
    Partridge, Edward
    Black, Amanda
    Johnson, Christine C.
    Lamerato, Lois
    Isaacs, Claudine
    Reding, Douglas J.
    Greenlee, Robert T.
    Yokochi, Lance A.
    Kessel, Bruce
    Crawford, E. David
    Church, Timothy R.
    Andriole, Gerald L.
    Weissfeld, Joel L.
    Fouad, Mona N.
    Chia, David
    O'Brien, Barbara
    Ragard, Lawrence R.
    Clapp, Jonathan D.
    Rathmell, Joshua M.
    Riley, Thomas L.
    Hartge, Patricia
    Pinsky, Paul F.
    Zhu, Claire S.
    Izmirlian, Grant
    Kramer, Barnett S.
    Miller, Anthony B.
    Xu, Jian-Lun
    Prorok, Philip C.
    Gohagan, John K.
    Berg, Christine D.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 305 (22): : 2295 - 2303