Assessing treatment effects in clinical trials with the Discan metric of the Sheehan Disability Scale

被引:359
作者
Sheehan, Kathy Harnett [1 ]
Sheehan, David V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Coll Med, Tampa, FL USA
关键词
anxiety disorders; depression; disability; Discan; impairment; mood disorders; outcomes; scales;
D O I
10.1097/YIC.0b013e3282f2b4d6
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) is a patient-rated, discretized analog measure of functional disability in work, social, and family life. Its increasing use in clinical trials in psychiatry suggests a need to assess its responsiveness and interpretability. In this paper we identify and review studies in which the SDS was used as a treatment outcome measure. Our objectives are (i) to evaluate the sensitivity of the SDS to treatment effects and (ii) to examine potential thresholds or cutoff scores for remission and response. Studies for the review were retrieved from the National Library of Medicine's PubMed database (1966 to 21 March 2007) and other sources. All studies had to use the SDS, be double-blind, controlled or large open-label trials in English. Studies assessing non pharmacological treatments, long-term trials (> 12 weeks), small n trials (less than 20 patients per treatment arm) and trials for conditions other than one of the anxiety disorders, depression, or premenstrual dysphoric disorder were excluded. Extracted data included the diagnostic target of treatment, n, study design, and method of analysis. Initial, endpoint and/or mean change scores were extracted from tables, text, or extrapolated from figures. In all, 37 studies meeting the inclusion criteria were retrieved and reviewed. All of the studies treated the SDS as a numeric scale and analyzed mean change or endpoint differences with parametric statistics. Three provided additional outcome data using nonparametric response or remission criteria. Overall, the SDS performed well in discriminating between active and inactive treatments. The results indicate that the SDS is sensitive to treatment effects. To establish reliable and valid cutoff scores for remission and response, there is a need to supplement parametric analyses using mean change and endpoint differences with nonparametric analyses showing the percentage meeting specified response and remission criteria. In addition, the percentages with endpoint scores of zero should be reported.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 83
页数:14
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]  
ALLGULANDER C, 2006, 26 ANN C ADAA MARCH
[2]   The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration [J].
Altman, DG ;
Schulz, KF ;
Moher, D ;
Egger, M ;
Davidoff, F ;
Elbourne, D ;
Gotzsche, PC ;
Lang, T .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (08) :663-694
[3]   Fluvoxamine in the treatment of panic disorder: a multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in outpatients [J].
Asnis, GM ;
Hameedi, FA ;
Goddard, AW ;
Potkin, SG ;
Black, D ;
Jameel, M ;
Desagani, K ;
Woods, SW .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2001, 103 (01) :1-14
[4]   Paroxetine in social phobia/social anxiety disorder -: Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study [J].
Baldwin, D ;
Bobes, J ;
Stein, DJ ;
Scharwächter, I ;
Faure, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1999, 175 :120-126
[5]  
Ballenger JC, 1999, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V60, P29
[6]   Double-blind, fixed-dose, placebo-controlled study of paroxetine in the treatment of panic disorder [J].
Ballenger, JC ;
Wheadon, DE ;
Steiner, M ;
Bushnell, W ;
Gergel, IP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1998, 155 (01) :36-42
[7]  
BALLENGER JC, 1988, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V45, P413
[8]   Modern psychometrics in clinimetrics: Impact on clinical trials of antidepressants [J].
Bech, P .
PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2004, 73 (03) :134-138
[9]  
BELLEW KM, 2003, AM PSYCH ASS ANN M S
[10]   A staging approach to measuring patient-centred subjective outcomes [J].
Bilsbury, CD ;
Richman, A .
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2002, 106 :5-40