PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION DIGITALIZATION AND CORRUPTION IN THE EU MEMBER STATES. A COMPARATIVE AND CORRELATIVE RESEARCH ANALYSIS

被引:23
作者
Androniceanu, Armenia [1 ]
Georgescu, Irina [2 ]
Kinnunen, Jani [3 ]
机构
[1] Bucharest Univ Econ Studies, Fac Adm & Publ Management, Bucharest, Romania
[2] Bucharest Univ Econ Studies, Dept Informat & Econ Cybernet, Bucharest, Romania
[3] Abo Akad Univ, Dept Informat Syst, Turku, Finland
关键词
public administration; digitalization; corruption; e-government; canonical correlation analysis; component analysis; composite index; ECONOMY; MANAGEMENT; INNOVATION; SECTOR; IMPACT;
D O I
10.24193/tras.65E.1
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Effective digitalization of public administrations and economies requires rethinking of how e -government and digital services with increasing e -participation can support corruption reduction and social development. This paper aims to study the interdependencies and differences between the multidimensional phenomena of administrative corruption and digitalization in the EU member states. The research methods applied are Canonical Correlation Analysis and Principal Component Analysis. Ten relevant variables for 2019 and 2020 were selected and integrated into this research. The research results showed that digitalization significantly improved the quality of public administrations and reduced corruption. The new composite index designed and determined for EU member states showed a vast gap between the Nordic and Eastern European countries. Our results confirm that the level of e-government was found to be the best predictor of control of corruption and government effectiveness suggesting that digitalized and less corrupt governments also made economies more competitive. The digitization of public administration and services is a strategic objective of EU member states and should become a priority in the new technological era.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 22
页数:18
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Are emerging technologies helping win the fight against corruption? A review of the state of evidence [J].
Adam, Isabelle ;
Fazekas, Mihaly .
INFORMATION ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2021, 57
[2]  
Afifi A., 2003, COMPUTER AIDED MULTI
[3]   DIGITALIZATION IN ECONOMY AND INNOVATION: THE EFFECT ON SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC PROCESSES [J].
Afonasova, M. A. ;
Panfilova, E. E. ;
Galichkina, M. A. ;
Slusarczyk, B. .
POLISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2019, 19 (02) :22-32
[4]   Corruption, institutions, and economic development [J].
Aidt, Toke S. .
OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY, 2009, 25 (02) :271-291
[5]   E-Government as an anti-corruption strategy [J].
Andersen, Thomas Barnebeck .
INFORMATION ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2009, 21 (03) :201-210
[6]   Studying the Risk of Corruption in the Least Corrupt Countries [J].
Andersson, Staffan .
PUBLIC INTEGRITY, 2008, 10 (03) :193-214
[7]  
Androniceanu A., 2020, Administratie si Management Public, P6, DOI DOI 10.24818/AMP/2020.35-01
[8]  
Androniceanu A., 2020, Administratie si Management Public, V34, P137, DOI [DOI 10.24818/AMP/2020.34-08, 10.24818/amp/2020.34-08]
[9]  
Androniceanu A., 2020, Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, V15, P42
[10]   A Multidimensional Approach to Competitiveness, Innovation and Well-Being in the EU Using Canonical Correlation Analysis [J].
Androniceanu, Ane-Mari ;
Kinnunen, Jani ;
Georgescu, Irina ;
Androniceanu, Armenia .
JOURNAL OF COMPETITIVENESS, 2020, 12 (04) :5-21