Modelling the socio-political feasibility of energy transition with system dynamics

被引:22
作者
Freeman, Rachel [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, UCL Energy Inst, Bartlett Sch Energy Environm & Resources, Cent House,14 Upper Woburn Pl, London WC1H 0NN, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Socio-technical transition; Energy systems modelling; Energy policy; Political capital; Social capital; System dynamics; SOCIOTECHNICAL-TRANSITIONS; CLIMATE POLICY; SUSTAINABILITY; CHALLENGES; INNOVATION; EFFICIENCY; READINESS; TRANSPORT; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.eist.2021.10.005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A system dynamics model of energy transition, TEMPEST, represents political and societal factors along with energy, emissions and mitigation measures, within a system of feedbacks. TEMPEST simulates energy transition from 1980 to 2080, calibrated to UK historical data. An exogenous uncertainty analysis showed most cases would achieve net zero before 2080, but only 20% would stay within the required carbon budget. Low probability, high impact cases have twice the future cumulative emissions than the best cases. High political capital for energy transition early on would likely reduce total mitigation required, but risks public pushback. Endogenous uncertainty about pushback and new measure difficulty could increase total emissions by a quarter. Dealing with unwanted feedbacks between society and government that reduce political capital will require responsive policy making. The socio-political feasibility of achieving the UK's net zero target is likely less than the techno-economic feasibility estimated through standard energy systems models.
引用
收藏
页码:486 / 500
页数:15
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Decarbonising road transport with hydrogen and electricity: Long term global technology learning scenarios [J].
Anandarajah, Gabrial ;
McDowall, Will ;
Ekins, Paul .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2013, 38 (08) :3419-3432
[2]  
Animah I, 2018, SAFETY AND RELIABILITY - SAFE SOCIETIES IN A CHANGING WORLD, P1767
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, EARTHSCAN
[4]   Commercialization of sustainable energy technologies [J].
Balachandra, P. ;
Nathan, Hippu Salk Kristle ;
Reddy, B. Sudhakara .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2010, 35 (08) :1842-1851
[5]   NEW PRODUCT GROWTH FOR MODEL CONSUMER DURABLES [J].
BASS, FM .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE SERIES A-THEORY, 1969, 15 (05) :215-227
[6]   Climate-friendly but socially rejected energy-transition pathways: The integration of techno-economic and socio-technical approaches in the Nordic-Baltic region [J].
Bolwig, Simon ;
Bolkesjo, Torjus Folsland ;
Klitkou, Antje ;
Lund, Peter D. ;
Bergaentzle, Claire ;
Borch, Kristian ;
Olsen, Ole Jess ;
Kirkerud, Jon Gustav ;
Chen, Yi-kuang ;
Gunkel, Philipp Andreas ;
Skytte, Klaus .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2020, 67
[7]   EXPLAINING RADICAL POLICY CHANGE: THE CASE OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND ENERGY POLICY UNDER THE BRITISH LABOUR GOVERNMENT 2006-10 [J].
Carter, Neil ;
Jacobs, Michael .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2014, 92 (01) :125-141
[8]   "Beyond the Attitude-Behaviour Gap: Novel Perspectives in Consumer Ethics": Introduction to the Thematic Symposium [J].
Caruana, Robert ;
Carrington, Michal J. ;
Chatzidakis, Andreas .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2016, 136 (02) :215-218
[9]   Carbon capture and storage readiness index: comparative review of global progress towards wide-scale deployment [J].
Consoli, Christopher P. ;
Havercroft, Ian ;
Irlam, Lawrence .
13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-13, 2017, 114 :7348-7355
[10]   Sustainability transition dynamics: Towards overcoming policy resistance [J].
de Gooyert, Vincent ;
Rouwette, Etienne ;
van Kranenburg, Hans ;
Freeman, Edward ;
van Breen, Harry .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2016, 111 :135-145