Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption and income in top ten renewable energy-consuming countries: Advanced Fourier based panel data approaches

被引:71
作者
Fareed, Zeeshan [1 ]
Pata, Ugur Korkut [2 ]
机构
[1] Huzhou Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Huzhou 313000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Osmaniye Korkut Ata Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Econ, Merkez, TR-80000 Osmaniye, Turkey
关键词
Causality; Cointegration; Paneldataanalysis; Renewableenergy; Non-renewableenergy; Fourierapproximation; ECONOMIC-GROWTH NEXUS; SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; CO2; EMISSIONS; REAL OUTPUT; CAUSALITY; GDP; COINTEGRATION; IMPACTS; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.156
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study investigates the impact of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on economic growth in the top ten renewable energy-consuming countries over the period 1970-2019 using newly developed Fourier panel cointegration and causality tests. The negligence of structural breaks can significantly alter causal relationships, leading to misinterpretation of renewable energy policies. This study eliminates the problem using Fourier-based techniques. The long-run estimates show that non-renewable energy supports economic growth in eight out of the ten countries, while renewable en-ergy has a positive effect on economic growth in Brazil, the United Kingdom, and France. The Fourier causality test indicates that the energy-led growth hypothesis is valid for both types of energy in the United States, India, the United Kingdom, and Spain. While the non-renewable energy-led growth hy-pothesis is valid for Italy, the conservation hypothesis is valid for both energy variables for Germany and for renewable energy for China. The overall results show that renewable energy can also be an important driver of economic growth, although not as strong as non-renewable energy. Therefore, countries need to closely monitor economic development while pursuing policies to reduce fossil fuels and deploy re-newables in a way that enables higher economic growth.(c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:805 / 821
页数:17
相关论文
共 95 条
[71]   Testing slope homogeneity in large panels [J].
Pesaran, M. Hashem ;
Yamagata, Takashi .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2008, 142 (01) :50-93
[72]   Testing Weak Cross-Sectional Dependence in Large Panels [J].
Pesaran, M. Hashem .
ECONOMETRIC REVIEWS, 2015, 34 (6-10) :1088-1116
[73]   Renewable energy policy and landscape management in Andalusia, Spain: The facts [J].
Prados, Maria-Jose .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (11) :6900-6909
[74]   Impacts of renewable energy consumption on the German economic growth: Evidence from combined cointegration test [J].
Rafindadi, Abdulkadir Abdulrashid ;
Ozturk, Ilhan .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 75 :1130-1141
[75]   The dynamic nexus of energy consumption, international trade and economic growth in BRICS and ASEAN countries: A panel causality test [J].
Rahman, Mohammad Mafizur .
ENERGY, 2021, 229 (229)
[76]   TESTING FOR STATIONARITY IN HETEROGENEOUS PANEL DATA IN THE CASE OF MODEL MISSPECIFICATION [J].
Rao, Yao ;
Hadri, Kaddour ;
Bu, Ruijun .
BULLETIN OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH, 2010, 62 (03) :209-225
[77]   Economic growth and renewable and non-renewable energy consumption: Evidence from the US states [J].
Salari, Mahmoud ;
Kelly, Inas ;
Doytch, Nadia ;
Javid, Roxana J. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2021, 178 :50-65
[78]   The relationship between disaggregate energy consumption and industrial production in the United States: An ARDL approach [J].
Sari, Ramazan ;
Ewing, Bradley T. ;
Soytas, Ugur .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2008, 30 (05) :2302-2313
[79]   Regime switching effect of COVID-19 pandemic on renewable electricity generation in Denmark [J].
Shah, Muhammad Ibrahim ;
Kirikkaleli, Dervis ;
Adedoyin, Festus Fatai .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2021, 175 :797-806
[80]   Does renewable energy consumption add in economic growth? An application of auto-regressive distributed lag model in Pakistan [J].
Shahbaz, Muhammad ;
Loganathan, Nanthakumar ;
Zeshan, Mohammad ;
Zaman, Khalid .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 44 :576-585