Tunnelling-induced response of buried pipelines and their effects on ground settlements

被引:49
作者
Lin, Cungang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Huang, Maosong [1 ,2 ]
Nadim, Farrokh [3 ]
Liu, Zhongqiang [3 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Dept Geotech Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] Tongji Univ, Key Lab Geotech & Underground Engn, Minist Educ, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[3] Norwegian Geotech Inst, N-0806 Oslo, Norway
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Soil-pipeline interaction; Tunnelling; Ground movement; tensionless Pasternak model; Analytical solution; SOIL-PIPE INTERACTION; JOINTED PIPELINE; DIFFERENT DEPTHS; VOLUME LOSS; MODEL TEST; DISPLACEMENTS; WINKLER; SANDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.tust.2019.103193
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In urban areas, it is common to construct new tunnels beneath existing buried pipelines. The accurate estimation of the response of pipelines and the overlying ground is of great importance as it is essential for the protection of the pipelines and other facilities. However, this problem is quite difficult as it involves complicated soil-pipeline interaction. In this paper, analytical solutions incorporating the tensionless Pasternak model, which takes full account of the gap formation and the pipeline orientation, have been formulated to estimate the response of the pipeline and the overlying ground. The analytical solutions have been validated by observations from field and model tests, followed by parametric studies to investigate the effects of the gap formation and pipeline orientations. It is found that the formation of a gap beneath the pipeline lowers its deflection and bending moment generated by tunnelling, and a pipeline with a larger intersection angle with respect to the tunnel alignment is anticipated to bear larger bending moment.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1982, TUNNELING, DOI DOI 10.1016/0148-9062(83)91768-0
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, THESIS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Thesis
[4]  
Attewell P.B., 1986, SOIL MOVEMENTS INDUC
[5]   Predicting tunnelling-induced ground movements and interpreting field measurements using numerical analysis: Crossrail case study at Hyde Park [J].
Avgerinos, V. ;
Potts, D. M. ;
Standing, J. R. ;
Wan, M. S. P. .
GEOTECHNIQUE, 2018, 68 (01) :31-49
[6]   Analytical model to predict building deflections induced by ground movements [J].
Basmaji, Bakri ;
Deck, Olivier ;
Al Heib, Marwan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2019, 23 (03) :409-431
[7]   Analytical model for the prediction of building deflections induced by ground movements [J].
Deck, Oliver ;
Singh, Amresh .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL METHODS IN GEOMECHANICS, 2012, 36 (01) :62-84
[8]  
Dyer MR, 1996, GEOTECHNICAL ASPECTS OF UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION IN SOFT GROUND, P671
[9]   Building response to tunnelling [J].
Farrell, Ruaidhri ;
Mair, Robert ;
Sciotti, Alessandra ;
Pigorini, Andrea .
SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS, 2014, 54 (03) :269-279
[10]   Greenfield tunnelling in sands: the effects of soil density and relative depth [J].
Franza, A. ;
Marshall, A. M. ;
Zhou, B. .
GEOTECHNIQUE, 2019, 69 (04) :297-307