Research on the relationship between citation and altmetrics of Open Access Papers from different geographical regions

被引:0
作者
Ding, Jingda [1 ]
Guo, Jie [1 ]
Liu, Xinjing [1 ]
Ma, Xiangjie [1 ]
Liu, Chao [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ, Dept Lib Informat & Archives, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
来源
17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENTOMETRICS & INFORMETRICS (ISSI2019), VOL II | 2019年
关键词
RESEARCH IMPACT; SCIENTOMETRICS; BIBLIOMETRICS; ADVANTAGE; METRICS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
With the development of open access, more and more scientific papers are published in journals as PLoS and are freely available by online. Analyzing the relationship between citation and altmetrics of open access papers published on PLoS in recent 10 years by the 6 countries which are selected in terms of regional distribution, scientific level and native language etc., we induced the following conclusions: First, the different geographical regions have effect on the citation and the altmetrics of 'view' and 'save' (excepting 'share), because the means of them for developing countries are less than that of developed countries in last 10 years and the curve peaks of these 3 indicators of different countries occur in different years. Second, the citation and the altmetrics of 'view' and 'save' are significantly correlated with each other and have the similar variation patterns and accumulate with year, while the altmetrics of 'share' is just opposite. Therefore, to some extent the altmetrics of 'view' and `save' can evaluate scientific influence as a complement of citation, and the 'share' of PLoS papers seemingly just reflects the attention/mention of user rather than the academic influence because it is transient and uncorrelated with the citation.
引用
收藏
页码:1424 / 1435
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Research impact and scholars' geographical diversity [J].
Abbasi, Alireza ;
Jaafari, Ali .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2013, 7 (03) :683-692
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ALTMETRICS MANIFESTO
[3]  
[Anonymous], PLOS ONE
[4]   The Use of Altmetrics as a Tool for Measuring Research Impact [J].
Barnes, Cameron .
AUSTRALIAN ACADEMIC & RESEARCH LIBRARIES, 2015, 46 (02) :121-134
[5]   The fruits of collaboration in a multidisciplinary field [J].
Bartneck, Christoph ;
Hu, Jun .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2010, 85 (01) :41-52
[6]   Does evaluative scientometrics lose its main focus on scientific quality by the new orientation towards societal impact? [J].
Bornmann, Lutz ;
Haunschild, Robin .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2017, 110 (02) :937-943
[7]   Alternative metrics in scientometrics: a meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics [J].
Bornmann, Lutz .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2015, 103 (03) :1123-1144
[8]   Altmetrics for Medical Educators [J].
Chisolm, Margaret S. .
ACADEMIC PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 41 (04) :460-466
[9]   Do "altmetrics" correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective [J].
Costas, Rodrigo ;
Zahedi, Zohreh ;
Wouters, Paul .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 66 (10) :2003-2019
[10]   Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial [J].
Davis, Philip M. ;
Lewenstein, Bruce V. ;
Simon, Daniel H. ;
Booth, James G. ;
Connolly, Mathew J. L. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 337 (7665) :343-345