An approach to provenance and tectonic setting of the Proterozoic Upper Kaimur Group sandstones, Son Valley: constraints from framework mineralogy and heavy mineral analysis

被引:0
作者
Quasim, M. A. [1 ]
Hota, Rabindra Nath [2 ]
Ahmad, A. H. M. [1 ]
Albaroot, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aligarh Muslim Univ, Dept Geol, Aligarh 202002, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Utkal Univ, PG Dept Geol, Bhubaneswar 751004, Orissa, India
来源
HIMALAYAN GEOLOGY | 2018年 / 39卷 / 02期
关键词
Proterozoic; Framework mineralogy; Heavy minerals; Provenance; Tectonic setting; Kaimur Group; NEOGENE SIWALIK SANDSTONE; HIMALAYAN FORELAND BASIN; CENTRAL INDIAN SHIELD; TURBIDITE PROVENANCE; CRUSTAL EVOLUTION; VINDHYAN BASIN; UTTAR-PRADESH; SEDIMENTS; AREA; PETROGENESIS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Framework mineralogy and heavy mineral analysis of Proterozoic Upper Kaimur Group Sandstones of the Vindhyan basin, Son Valley have been investigated on composition, provenance and tectonic setting. The studied sandstones are quartzarenite to sublitharenite in composition with high quartz, low feldspar, mica and low to moderate amounts of lithic fragments of metamorphic and sedimentary rocks. The detrital modal compositions of these sandstones reveal that these sandstones belong to the continental block, recycled orogen, rifted continental margin tectonic regime with maturity and stability of the source region. The characteristic heavy minerals are zircon, tourmaline, rutile, epidote, biotite, chlorite, staurolite, hornblende, hypersthene, garnet and opaques. The non-opaque heavy mineral assemblage of the sandstone is dominated by zircon, tourmaline and rutile (ZTR) suggests a recycled sedimentary source. Though heavy mineral suites of all the sandstone samples are by and large similar, but differences are seen in their frequencies of heavy minerals in a vertical succession. Mineralogical maturity coupled with characteristic heavy mineral associations is consistent with northern and northwestern palaeoflow and tectonic evolutionary history of the region that indicates Mahakoshal Group and Chhotanagpur granite gneiss present in the southern side of the study area show the source of the Upper Kaimur Group rocks.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 160
页数:16
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
Acharyya SK., 2003, Gondwana Geol. Mag, V7, P9
[2]   Diagenetic Features of Jurassic Fort Member Sandstone, Jaisalmer Formation, Western Rajasthan [J].
Ahmad, Faiz ;
Ahmad, A. H. M. ;
Quasim, M. A. .
JOURNAL OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF INDIA, 2017, 90 (03) :273-282
[3]  
Anbarasu K, 2001, J GEOL SOC INDIA, V57, P179
[4]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[5]   Provenance of sandstones from the Lower Cretaceous Sasayama Group, Inner Zone of Southwest Japan [J].
Asiedu, DK ;
Suzuki, S ;
Shibata, T .
SEDIMENTARY GEOLOGY, 2000, 131 (1-2) :9-24
[6]  
Awasthi N, 1961, IND MINERAL, V2, P6
[7]  
Banerjee I., 1974, Geol. Min. Metal. Soc. India, V46, P101
[8]  
BASU A, 1975, J SEDIMENT PETROL, V45, P873
[9]   Overview of the meso- to neoproterozoic evolution of the Vindhyan basin, central India [J].
Bose, PK ;
Sarkar, S ;
Chakrabarty, S ;
Banerjee, S .
SEDIMENTARY GEOLOGY, 2001, 141 :395-419
[10]   Turbidite provenance in the Lower Palaeozoic Manx Group, Isle of Man: implications for the tectonic setting of Eastern Avalonia [J].
Burnett, DJ ;
Quirk, DG .
JOURNAL OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2001, 158 :913-924