Uncertainties in cloud phase and optical thickness retrievals from the Earth Polychromatic Imaging Camera (EPIC)

被引:20
作者
Meyer, Kerry [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Yuekui [1 ,2 ]
Platnick, Steven [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Space Res Assoc, Goddard Earth Sci Technol & Res GESTAR, Columbia, MD 21046 USA
[2] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
关键词
RADIATIVE-TRANSFER; TOP HEIGHT; MODIS; SCATTERING; ALGORITHMS; TERRA; ISCCP;
D O I
10.5194/amt-9-1785-2016
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
This paper presents an investigation of the expected uncertainties of a single-channel cloud optical thickness (COT) retrieval technique, as well as a simple cloud-temperature-threshold-based thermodynamic phase approach, in support of the Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR) mission. DSCOVR cloud products will be derived from Earth Polychromatic Imaging Camera (EPIC) observations in the ultraviolet and visible spectra. Since EPIC is not equipped with a spectral channel in the short-wave or mid-wave infrared that is sensitive to cloud effective radius (CER), COT will be inferred from a single visible channel with the assumption of appropriate CER values for liquid and ice phase clouds. One month of Aqua MODerate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) daytime granules from April 2005 is selected for investigating cloud phase sensitivity, and a subset of these granules that has similar EPIC Sun-view geometry is selected for investigating COT uncertainties. EPIC COT retrievals are simulated with the same algorithm as the operational MODIS cloud products (MOD06), except using fixed phase-dependent CER values. Uncertainty estimates are derived by comparing the single-channel COT retrievals with the baseline bi-spectral MODIS retrievals. Results show that a single-channel COT retrieval is feasible for EPIC. For ice clouds, single-channel retrieval errors are minimal (<2 %) due to the particle size insensitivity of the assumed ice crystal (i.e., severely roughened aggregate of hexagonal columns) scattering properties at visible wavelengths, while for liquid clouds the error is mostly limited to within 10 %, although for thin clouds (COT < 2) the error can be higher. Potential uncertain-ties in EPIC cloud masking and cloud temperature retrievals are not considered in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:1785 / 1797
页数:13
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Ackerman S., 2010, ATBDMOD06 NASA
  • [2] Ackerman S. A., 2015, MODIS Atmosphere L2 Cloud Mask Product, DOI [10.5067/MODIS/MYD35_L2.006, DOI 10.5067/MODIS/MYD35_L2.006]
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1998, NEAR REAL TIME SSM I
  • [4] MODIS Cloud-Top Property Refinements for Collection 6
    Baum, Bryan A.
    Menzel, W. Paul
    Frey, Richard A.
    Tobin, David C.
    Holz, Robert E.
    Ackerman, Steve A.
    Heidinger, Andrew K.
    Yang, Ping
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY, 2012, 51 (06) : 1145 - 1163
  • [5] Frequency and causes of failed MODIS cloud property retrievals for liquid phase clouds over global oceans
    Cho, Hyoun-Myoung
    Zhang, Zhibo
    Meyer, Kerry
    Lebsock, Matthew
    Platnick, Steven
    Ackerman, Andrew S.
    Di Girolamo, Larry
    C-Labonnote, Laurent
    Cornet, Celine
    Riedi, Jerome
    Holz, Robert E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2015, 120 (09) : 4132 - 4154
  • [6] COX C, 1954, J MAR RES, V13, P198
  • [7] MEASUREMENT OF THE ROUGHNESS OF THE SEA SURFACE FROM PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SUNS GLITTER
    COX, C
    MUNK, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1954, 44 (11) : 838 - 850
  • [8] Davis A, 1997, J ATMOS SCI, V54, P241, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054<0241:TLSBIS>2.0.CO
  • [9] 2
  • [10] DERBER JC, 1991, WEATHER FORECAST, V6, P538, DOI 10.1175/1520-0434(1991)006<0538:TNGOAS>2.0.CO