Using applied operations research and geographical information systems to evaluate effective factors in storage service of municipal solid waste management systems

被引:20
作者
Erfani, Seyed Mohammad Hassan [1 ]
Danesh, Shahnaz [1 ]
Karrabi, Seyed Mohsen [1 ]
Shad, Rouzbeh [1 ]
Nemati, Samaneh [2 ]
机构
[1] Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Mashhad, Iran
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
Waste storage service; Geographic information systems; Operations research; Location allocation; Municipal solid waste management; VEHICLE-ROUTING PROBLEM; MSW COLLECTION ROUTES; FUEL CONSUMPTION; GIS; LOCATION; ALLOCATION; OPTIMIZATION; BIN; MODEL; AREA;
D O I
10.1016/j.wasman.2018.08.003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
One of the important elements of municipal solid waste management (MSWM) system is waste storage service. Residents deal with the system in this stage and the efficiency of waste collection element, the most expensive element of waste management system, relies on the performance of storage service. In this study, the performance of two different models including minimize facilities (MF) and maximize capacitated coverage (MCC) was investigated to find optimal locations for storage stations in Alandasht district located in Mashhad- Iran. Four effective factors including total service coverage, residential engagement, surplus container capacity devoted to each station and the ratio of the standard deviation to the arithmetic mean of solid waste allocated to each station were considered to compare these models. The MF model provided the highest service coverage by proposing 26 stations covering 98.56 percent of total residences. According to 26 stations proposed with MF model, MCC was run with 26, 27, 25 and 24 stations. MCC-27 provided the maximum attendance of residents with 54.47 percent. However, the most economical container distribution to the stations proposed with MCC-24 by presenting the minimum ratio of surplus devoted capacity to total demand, 33.74 percent. Finally, MCC-25 provided better distribution of residents to the storage stations, i.e., the minimum ratio of the standard deviation to the average solid waste devoted to stations, 22.13 percent. service area (SA) analysis applied to MF, MCC-25 and MCC-24 showed more than 60 percent of residences are located between 0 and 100 m walking distance for these analyses. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:346 / 355
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Direct and indirect effects of waste management policies on household waste behaviour: The case of Swedenl [J].
Andersson, Camilla ;
Stage, Jesper .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 76 :19-27
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, VEHICLE ROUTING PROB, DOI DOI 10.1137/1.9780898718515
[3]  
Azarmand Z, 2009, CONTRIB MANAG SCI, P93, DOI 10.1007/978-3-7908-2151-2_5
[4]   Modeling the problem of locating collection areas for urban waste management. An application to the metropolitan area of Barcelona [J].
Bautista, J ;
Pereira, J .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2006, 34 (06) :617-629
[5]   Optimization of the Location of the Municipal Solid Waste Bins Using Geographic Information Systems [J].
Carlos, Mar ;
Gallardo, Antonio ;
Peris, Monica ;
Colomer, Francisco J. .
PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2014, 2016, :171-184
[6]  
Chalkias C., 2009, Technology, V1, P11
[7]   GIS technology for vehicle routing and scheduling in solid waste collection systems [J].
Chang, NB ;
Lu, HY ;
Wei, YL .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1997, 123 (09) :901-910
[8]   LOCATION-ALLOCATION PROBLEMS [J].
COOPER, L .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1963, 11 (03) :331-343
[9]   Technologies and decision support systems to aid solid-waste management: a systematic review [J].
de Souza Melare, Angelina Vitorino ;
Gonzalez, Sahudy Montenegro ;
Faceli, Katti ;
Casadei, Vitor .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 59 :567-584
[10]   Energy and time modelling of kerbside waste collection: Changes incurred when adding source separated food waste [J].
Edwards, Joel ;
Othman, Maazuza ;
Burn, Stewart ;
Crossin, Enda .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2016, 56 :454-465