Is it time to drop the 'knowledge translation' metaphor? A critical literature review

被引:336
作者
Greenhalgh, Trisha [1 ]
Wieringa, Sietse [2 ]
机构
[1] Barts & London Queen Marys Sch Med & Dent, Ctr Primary Care & Publ Hlth, Global Hlth Policy & Innovat Unit, London E1 2AB, England
[2] Nederlands Huisarts Genootschap Landelijke Huisar, HAWeb Implementat Unit, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
MODE; 2; POLICY;
D O I
10.1258/jrsm.2011.110285
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The literature on 'knowledge translation' presents challenges for the reviewer because different terms have been used to describe the generation, sharing and application of knowledge and different research approaches embrace different philosophical positions on what knowledge is. We present a narrative review of this literature which deliberately sought to highlight rather than resolve tensions between these different framings. Our findings suggest that while 'translation' is a widely used metaphor in medicine, it constrains how we conceptualise and study the link between knowledge and practice. The 'translation' metaphor has, arguably, led to particular difficulties in the fields of 'evidence-based management' and 'evidence-based policymaking' - where it seems that knowledge obstinately refuses to be driven unproblematically into practice. Many non-medical disciplines such as philosophy, sociology and organization science conceptualise knowledge very differently, as being (for example) 'created', 'constructed', 'embodied', 'performed' and 'collectively negotiated' - and also as being value-laden and tending to serve the vested interests of dominant elites. We propose that applying this wider range of metaphors and models would allow us to research the link between knowledge and practice in more creative and critical ways. We conclude that research should move beyond a narrow focus on the 'know-do gap' to cover a richer agenda, including: (a) the situation-specific practical wisdom (phronesis) that underpins clinical judgement; (b) the tacit knowledge that is built and shared among practitioners ('mindlines'); (c) the complex links between power and knowledge; and (d) approaches to facilitating macro-level knowledge partnerships between researchers, practitioners, policymakers and commercial interests.
引用
收藏
页码:501 / 509
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Bridging the ''know-do'' gap: meeting on knowledge translation in global health
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1978, Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics
[3]  
Bourdieu P., 1987, DISTINCTION SOCIAL C, DOI [10.4324/9780429494338-6, DOI 10.1002/9780470755679.CH15]
[4]   Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective [J].
Brown, JS ;
Duguid, P .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2001, 12 (02) :198-213
[5]  
Choi BCK, 2005, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V59, P93
[6]   Knowledge Exchange Processes in Organizations and Policy Arenas: A Narrative Systematic Review of the Literature [J].
Contandriopoulos, Damien ;
Lemire, Marc ;
Denis, Jean-Louis ;
Tremblay, Emile .
MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2010, 88 (04) :444-483
[7]  
Cooksey D., 2006, REV UK HLTH RES FUND
[8]  
Crilly T., 2010, Research utilisation and knowledge mobilisation: A scoping review of the literature
[9]   Why 'knowledge transfer' is misconceived for applied social research [J].
Davies, Huw ;
Nutley, Sandra ;
Walter, Isabel .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH & POLICY, 2008, 13 (03) :188-190
[10]  
Dreyfus H. L., 1986, Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer