Initial experience with stereotactic body radiotherapy for intrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation

被引:8
|
作者
Au, Kin Pan [1 ]
Chiang, Chi Leung [2 ]
Chan, Albert Chi Yan [1 ]
Cheung, Tan To [1 ]
Lo, Chung Mau [1 ]
Chok, Kenneth Siu Ho [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hosp, Dept Surg, 102 Pokfulam Rd, Hong Kong 999077, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hosp, Dept Clin Oncol, Hong Kong 999077, Peoples R China
关键词
Stereotactic body radiotherapy; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Liver transplantation; Recurrence; Radiosurgery; Outcomes; TRANSARTERIAL CHEMOEMBOLIZATION; MANAGEMENT; CRITERIA; IMPACT; CIRRHOSIS;
D O I
10.12998/wjcc.v8.i13.2758
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Graft hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after liver transplant is more frequently encountered. Graft hepatectomy is technically challenging and is associated with high morbidity. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of primary HCC. However, its role in HCC recurrence in a liver graft remains unclear. AIM To evaluate the safety and efficacy of SBRT for the treatment of graft HCC recurrence after liver transplantation. METHODS A retrospective study was conducted. From 2012 to 2018, 6 patients with intrahepatic HCC recurrence after liver transplant were treated with SBRT at Queen Mary Hospital, the University of Hong Kong. The primary outcome was time to overall disease progression and secondary outcomes were time to local progression and best local response, as assessed with the Modified response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumours criteria. Patients were monitored for treatment related toxicities and graft dysfunction. RESULTS A total of 9 treatment courses were given for 13 tumours. The median tumour size was 2.3 cm (range 0.7-3.6 cm). Two (22%) patients had inferior vena cava tumour thrombus. The best local treatment response was: 5 (55%) complete response, 1 (11%) partial response and 3 (33%) stable disease. After a median follow up duration of 15.5 mo, no local progression or mortality was yet observed. The median time to overall disease progression was 6.5 mo. There were 6 regional progression in the liver graft (67%) and 2 distant progression in the lung (22%). There was no grade 3 or above toxicity and there was no graft dysfunction after SBRT. CONCLUSION SBRT appears to be safe in this context. Regional progression is the mode of failure.
引用
收藏
页码:2758 / 2768
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Living donor liver transplantation does not increase tumor recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma compared to deceased donor transplantation
    Xiao, Guang-Qin
    Song, Jiu-Lin
    Shen, Shu
    Yang, Jia-Yin
    Yan, Lu-Nan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (31) : 10953 - 10959
  • [32] Serum biomarkers and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation
    Citores, Maria J.
    Lucena, Jose L.
    de la Fuente, Sara
    Cuervas-Mons, Valentin
    WORLD JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 11 (01) : 50 - 64
  • [33] Development of a deep pathomics score for predicting hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation
    Qu, Wei-Feng
    Tian, Meng-Xin
    Lu, Hong-Wei
    Zhou, Yu-Fu
    Liu, Wei-Ren
    Tang, Zheng
    Yao, Zhao
    Huang, Run
    Zhu, Gui-Qi
    Jiang, Xi-Fei
    Tao, Chen-Yang
    Fang, Yuan
    Gao, Jun
    Wu, Xiao-Ling
    Chen, Jia-Feng
    Zhao, Qian-Fu
    Yang, Rui
    Chu, Tian-Hao
    Zhou, Jian
    Fan, Jia
    Yu, Jin-Hua
    Shi, Ying-Hong
    HEPATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 17 (04) : 927 - 941
  • [34] Current strategies for preventing the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation
    Wang, Zhuo-Yi
    Geng, Lei
    Zheng, Shu-Sen
    HEPATOBILIARY & PANCREATIC DISEASES INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 14 (02) : 145 - 149
  • [35] Prognosis after recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplantation: predictors for successful treatment and survival
    Nagai, Shunji
    Mangus, Richard S.
    Kubal, Chandrashekhar A.
    Ekser, Burcin
    Fridell, Jonathan A.
    Klingler, Kendell R.
    Maluccio, Mary A.
    Tector, A. Joseph
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 29 (12) : 1156 - 1163
  • [36] Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation: Risk factors, screening and clinical presentation
    Filgueira, Norma Arteiro
    WORLD JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 11 (03) : 261 - 272
  • [37] Serum biomarkers and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation
    Maria J Citores
    Jose L Lucena
    Sara de la Fuente
    Valentin Cuervas-Mons
    World Journal of Hepatology, 2019, 11 (01) : 50 - 64
  • [38] Accuracy of staging as a predictor for recurrence after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Shah, Shimul A.
    Tan, Jensen C. C.
    McGilvray, Ian D.
    Cattral, Mark S.
    Cleary, Sean P.
    Levy, Gary A.
    Greig, Paul D.
    Grant, David R.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 81 (12) : 1633 - 1639
  • [39] The Value of Serum α-Fetoprotein in Predicting Tumor Recurrence After Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Xu, Xiao
    Ke, Qing-Hong
    Shao, Zhe-Xin
    Wu, Jian
    Chen, Jun
    Zhou, Lin
    Zheng, Shu-Sen
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2009, 54 (02) : 385 - 388
  • [40] Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Liver Transplantation: Clinical Patterns and Hierarchy of Salvage Treatments
    Giuliani, Tommaso
    Montalva, Eva
    Maupoey, Javier
    Bosca, Andrea
    Hernando, Ana
    Calatayud, David
    Navarro, Vicente
    Rubin, Angel
    Vinaixa, Carmen
    Lopez-Andujar, Rafael
    DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 41 (04) : 181 - 193