Public choice and private insurance: The case of small group market reforms

被引:0
作者
Hall, MA [1 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Winston Salem, NC 27109 USA
来源
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LAW REVIEW | 1998年 / 03期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
In this response to Professor Richard Epstein's book Mortal Peril, Professor Hall argues that health care is a partial public good which invites limited governmental intervention and some elements of social insurance. He therefore takes issue with Professor Epstein's opposition to small group market reforms. Such reforms include guaranteed issue, limits on preexisting condition exclusions, and affordability provisions. Professor Hall argues that small group market reforms help to preserve a private insurance market as well as a voluntary insurance purchase system. He agrees with Professor Epstein that such reforms create cross-subsidies and alter how insurers compete, but Professor Hall argues that these effects have market advantages. Although Professor Hall further agrees with Professor Epstein that some reforms create market distortions, Professor Hall has found from his empirical studies that small market reforms work reasonably well.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 775
页数:19
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] PAYING FOR HEALTH-CARE
    BODENHEIMER, T
    GRUMBACH, K
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 272 (08): : 634 - 639
  • [2] Browne MarkJ., 1992, J RISK INSUR, V59, P13
  • [3] CHOLLET DJ, 1994, COMMUNITY RATING ISS
  • [4] CRAIG VC, 1992, GUARANTEED ISSUE GUA
  • [5] *CTR STUD HLTH SYS, 1998, DAT B, V5
  • [6] ELHAUGE E, 1994, CALIF LAW REV, V82, P1451
  • [7] Markets and collective action in regulating managed care
    Enthoven, AC
    Singer, SJ
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 1997, 16 (06) : 26 - 32
  • [8] EPSTEIN RA, 1997, MORTAL PERIL OUR INA, P431
  • [9] FISK M, 1996, J SOC PHIL WIN, P14
  • [10] GABEL JR, 1997, HLTH AFF SEP, P109