Prognostic Significance of Soluble Fas and Soluble Fas Ligand in Serum of Patients with Complete Hydatidiform Moles

被引:1
作者
Soni, Simmi [3 ]
Rath, Gayatri [1 ,2 ]
Deval, Ravi [4 ]
Salhan, Sudha [2 ,5 ]
Mishra, Ashwini Kumar [4 ]
Saxena, Sunita [4 ]
机构
[1] Vardhman Mahavir Med Coll, Dept Anat, New Delhi 110029, India
[2] Safdarjang Hosp, New Delhi 110029, India
[3] Dr VRK Womens Med Coll & Res Ctr, Dept Anat, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
[4] Inst Pathol ICMR, New Delhi, India
[5] Vardhman Mahavir Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, New Delhi 110029, India
关键词
Apoptosis; complete hydatidiform moles; placenta; sFas; sFas L; MEDIATED APOPTOSIS; FAS/FAS LIGAND; EXPRESSION; LEUKOCYTES; CARCINOMA; SYSTEM; SFASL; CD95;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0897.2011.00988.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Problem Despite of advances in diagnosis and staging, the prognosis of hydatidiform mole (HM) remains intricate. HM possesses the substantial risk of developing persistent trophoblastic disease (PTD), which is considerably high for complete hydatidiform moles (CHMs). Significance of serum soluble Fas (sFas) and soluble FasL (sFasL) has been observed in various malignancies; however, there is no report till date on HM. Method of study The serum levels of sFas and sFasL were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 62 patients with CHMs and 64 healthy controls. The protein concentrations were also correlated with clinicopathological parameters, beta-hCG level, and clinical outcome. Results The serum sFas and sFasL levels in patients with CHM were significantly higher than those in control group (mean SD: 703.497 +/- 491.759 versus 348.141 +/- 175.24; P < 0.004 and 31.17 +/- 18.758 versus 18.802 +/- 6.775; P < 0.0001, respectively). Patients who progressed to PTD demonstrated higher sFas and sFasL concentrations than those who regressed spontaneously (794.211 +/- 415.892 versus 446.69 +/- 161.382; P < 0.046 and 37.55 +/- 20.337 versus 22.763 +/- 6.52; P < 0.011, respectively). Furthermore, significant associations were observed among sFas, sFasL, and beta-hCG levels (P < 0.0001 for all associations). Conclusion Production of sFas and sFasL may play a crucial role in progression of CHM and may serve both as prognostic tool and therapeutic target in improving the clinical outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 236
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] The Role of MMP7 and Its Cross-Talk with the FAS/FASL System during the Acquisition of Chemoresistance to Oxaliplatin
    Almendro, Vanessa
    Ametller, Elisabet
    Garcia-Recio, Susana
    Collazo, Olga
    Casas, Ignasi
    Auge, Josep M.
    Maurel, Joan
    Gascon, Pedro
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2009, 4 (03):
  • [2] Benirschke K, 2001, PATHOLOGY HUMAN PLAC
  • [3] Fas ligand as a tool for immunosuppression and generation of immune tolerance
    Bohana-Kashtan, O
    Civin, CI
    [J]. STEM CELLS, 2004, 22 (06) : 908 - 924
  • [4] Fas antigen expression on the decidual lymphocytes of pre-eclamptic patients
    Darmochwal-Kolarz, D
    Rolinski, J
    Leszczynska-Gorzelak, B
    Oleszczuk, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE IMMUNOLOGY, 2000, 43 (04): : 197 - 201
  • [5] Mcl-1 expression in gestational trophoblastic disease correlates with clinical outcome - A differential expression study
    Fong, PY
    Xue, WC
    Ngan, HYS
    Chan, KYK
    Khoo, US
    Tsao, SW
    Chiu, PM
    Man, LS
    Cheung, ANY
    [J]. CANCER, 2005, 103 (02) : 268 - 276
  • [6] Protein-based therapeutic approaches targeting death receptors
    French, LE
    Tschopp, J
    [J]. CELL DEATH AND DIFFERENTIATION, 2003, 10 (01) : 117 - 123
  • [7] Placental Fas/Fas ligand expression in early pregnancy losses
    Guven, Emine Seda Guvendag
    Okur, Hamza
    Beksac, Mehmet Sinan
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE IMMUNOLOGY, 2008, 60 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [8] Expression of functional Fas ligand in choriocarcinoma
    Hammer, A
    Hartmann, M
    Sedlmayr, P
    Walcher, W
    Kohnen, G
    Dohr, G
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE IMMUNOLOGY, 2002, 48 (04): : 226 - 234
  • [9] Serum soluble Fas levels in ovarian cancer
    Hefler, L
    Mayerhofer, K
    Nardi, A
    Reinthaller, A
    Kainz, C
    Tempfer, C
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 96 (01) : 65 - 69
  • [10] Jodo S, 1998, CLIN EXP IMMUNOL, V112, P166