Development of quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided by midwives using a RAND-modified Delphi method

被引:9
作者
Ueda, Kayo [1 ,2 ]
Ohtera, Shosuke [1 ]
Kaso, Misato [1 ]
Nakayama, Takeo [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Dept Hlth Informat, Sch Publ Hlth, Sakyo Ku, Yoshida Konoe Cho, Kyoto 6068501, Japan
[2] Morinomiya Univ Med Sci, Sch Nursing, Fac Hlth Sci, Suminoe Ku, 1-26-16 Nankokita, Osaka 5598611, Japan
来源
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH | 2017年 / 17卷
关键词
Low-risk labor; Quality indicator; Clinical practice guidelines; RAND-modified Delphi method; HEALTH-CARE; ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-017-1468-4
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: In childbirth, most deliveries are low-risk, defined as spontaneous labor at full term without special highrisk facts or complications, especially in high-resource countries where maternal and perinatal mortality rates are very low. Indeed, the majority of mothers and infants have no serious conditions during labor. However, the quality of care provided is not assured, and performance may vary by birthing facility and provider. The overuse of technology in childbirth in some parts of the world is almost certainly based on assumptions like, "something can go wrong at any minute." There is a need to assess the quality of care provided for mothers and infants in low-risk labor. We aimed to develop specific quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided primarily by midwives in Japan. Methods: We used a RAND-modified Delphi method, which integrates evidence review with expert consensus development. The procedure comprises five steps: (1) literature review, including clinical practice guidelines, to extract and develop quality indicator candidates; (2) formation of a multidisciplinary panel; (3) independent panel ratings (Round 1); (4) panel meeting and independent panel ratings (Round 2); and (5) independent panel ratings (Round 3). The three independent panel ratings (Rounds 1-3) were held between July and December 2012. Results: The assembled multidisciplinary panel comprised eight clinicians (two pediatricians, three obstetricians, and three midwives) and three mothers who were nonclinicians. Evidentiary review extracted 166 key recommendations from 32 clinical practice guidelines, and 31 existing quality indicators were added. After excluding duplicate recommendations and quality indicators, the panel discussed 25 candidate indicators. Of these, 18 were adopted, one was modified, six were not adopted, and four were added during the meeting, respectively. Conclusions: We established 23 quality indicators for low-risk labor care provided by midwives in labor units in Japan.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour
    Alfirevic, Z.
    Devane, D.
    Gyte, G. M. L.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2006, (03):
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, COCHRANE DB SYST REV
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2011, SOC INS ABC OBST, P81
  • [4] [Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
  • [5] Simultaneous development of guidelines and quality indicators - how do guideline groups act? A worldwide survey
    Blozik, Eva
    Nothacker, Monika
    Bunk, Thomas
    Szecsenyi, Joachim
    Ollenschlaeger, Guenter
    Scherer, Martin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2012, 25 (08) : 712 - +
  • [6] Bojo AKS, 2004, J CLIN NURS, V13, P75
  • [7] Quality Indicators for Continuous Monitoring to Improve Maternal and Infant Health in Maternity Departments: A Modified Delphi Survey of an International Multidisciplinary Panel
    Boulkedid, Rym
    Sibony, Olivier
    Goffinet, Francois
    Fauconnier, Arnaud
    Branger, Bernard
    Alberti, Corinne
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (04):
  • [8] Improving the quality of health care - Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care
    Campbell, SM
    Braspenning, J
    Hutchinson, A
    Marshall, MN
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7393): : 816 - 819
  • [9] Quality assessment for three common conditions in primary care: validity and reliability of review criteria developed by expert panels for angina, asthma and type 2 diabetes
    Campbell, SM
    Hann, M
    Hacker, J
    Durie, A
    Thapar, A
    Roland, MO
    [J]. QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2002, 11 (02): : 125 - 130
  • [10] Finding the right indicators for assessing quality midwifery care
    de Bruin-Kooistra, Mieneke
    Amelink-Verburg, Marianne P.
    Buitendijk, Simone E.
    Westert, Gert P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2012, 24 (03) : 301 - 310