Treatment Response Evaluation of Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Usefulness of the Imaging Parameters of MRI and PET/CT

被引:41
作者
An, Yeong Yi [1 ]
Kim, Sung Hun [2 ]
Kang, Bong Joo [2 ]
Lee, Ah Won [3 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, St Vincents Hosp, Dept Radiol, Suwon, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul 137701, South Korea
[3] Catholic Univ Korea, Coll Med, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Dept Hosp Pathol, Seoul 137701, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy; Breast Neoplasm; Pathologic Response; Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI; Diffusion-weighted MRI; Positron Emission Tomography; PATHOLOGICAL COMPLETE RESPONSE; PREDICTION; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.3346/jkms.2015.30.6.808
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This study was aimed to evaluate the ability of imaging parameters measured on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) to serve as response markers in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). In 20 patients with breast cancer, DCE-MRI and DWI using a 3 T scanner and PET/CT were performed before and after NAC. DCE-MRI was analyzed using an automatic computer-aided detection program (MRCAD). The response imaging parameters were compared with the pathologic response. The areas under the curve (AUCs) for DCE-MRI using MR-CAD analysis, DWI and PET/CT were 0.77, 0.59 and 0.76, respectively. The combination of all parameters measured by MRCAD showed the highest diagnostic performance and accuracy (AUC = 0.77, accuracy = 90%). The combined use of the parameters of PET/CT with DCE-MRI or DWI showed a trend toward improved specificity and negative predictive value (100%, 100%, accuracy = 87.5%). The use of DCE-MRI using MR-CAD parameters indicated better diagnostic performance in predicting the final pathological response compared with DWI and PET/CT, although no statistically significant difference was observed. The combined use of PET/CT with DCE-MRI or DWI may improve the specificity for predicting a pathological response.
引用
收藏
页码:808 / 815
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   The Role of PET CT to Evaluate the Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Breast Cancer: Comparison With Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging [J].
Choi, Jae Hyuck ;
Lim, Hye In ;
Lee, Se Kyung ;
Kim, Wan Wook ;
Kim, Sang Min ;
Cho, Eunyoon ;
Ko, Eun Young ;
Han, Boo-Kyung ;
Park, Yeon Hee ;
Ahn, Jin-Seok ;
Im, Young-Hyuck ;
Lee, Jeong Eon ;
Yang, Jung-Hyun ;
Nam, Seok Jin .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 102 (05) :392-397
[2]   Assessment of residual tumour by FDG-PET: conventional imaging and clinical examination following primary chemotherapy of large and locally advanced breast cancer [J].
Dose-Schwarz, J. ;
Tiling, R. ;
Avril-Sassen, S. ;
Mahner, S. ;
Lebeau, A. ;
Weber, C. ;
Schwaiger, M. ;
Jaenicke, F. ;
Untch, M. ;
Avril, N. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 102 (01) :35-41
[3]   Dynamic contrast enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the breast is superior to triple assessment for the pre-operative detection of multifocal breast cancer [J].
Drew, PJ ;
Chatterjee, S ;
Turnbull, LW ;
Read, J ;
Carleton, PJ ;
Fox, JN ;
Monson, JRT ;
Kerin, MJ .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 6 (06) :599-603
[4]   New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [J].
Eisenhauer, E. A. ;
Therasse, P. ;
Bogaerts, J. ;
Schwartz, L. H. ;
Sargent, D. ;
Ford, R. ;
Dancey, J. ;
Arbuck, S. ;
Gwyther, S. ;
Mooney, M. ;
Rubinstein, L. ;
Shankar, L. ;
Dodd, L. ;
Kaplan, R. ;
Lacombe, D. ;
Verweij, J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) :228-247
[5]  
Gonzalez-Angulo AM, 2007, ADV EXP MED BIOL, V608, P1
[6]   Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: MR Imaging for Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy-Results from ACRIN 6657/I-SPY TRIAL [J].
Hylton, Nola M. ;
Blume, Jeffrey D. ;
Bernreuter, Wanda K. ;
Pisano, Etta D. ;
Rosen, Mark A. ;
Morris, Elizabeth A. ;
Weatherall, Paul T. ;
Lehman, Constance D. ;
Newstead, Gillian M. ;
Polin, Sandra ;
Marques, Helga S. ;
Esserman, Laura J. ;
Schnall, Mitchell D. .
RADIOLOGY, 2012, 263 (03) :663-672
[7]   Meta-analysis confirms achieving pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts favourable prognosis for breast cancer patients [J].
Kong, Xiangnan ;
Moran, Meena S. ;
Zhang, Ning ;
Haffty, Bruce ;
Yang, Qifeng .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 47 (14) :2084-2090
[8]   The role of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing residual disease and pathologic complete response in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A systematic review [J].
Lobbes M.B.I. ;
Prevos R. ;
Smidt M. ;
Tjan-Heijnen V.C.G. ;
van Goethem M. ;
Schipper R. ;
Beets-Tan R.G. ;
Wildberger J.E. .
Insights into Imaging, 2013, 4 (2) :163-175
[9]   Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: A meta-analysis [J].
Mauri, D ;
Pavlidis, N ;
Ioannidis, JPA .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2005, 97 (03) :188-194
[10]   The assessment of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography [J].
Park, Jeong Seon ;
Moon, Woo Kyung ;
Lyou, Chae Yeon ;
Cho, Nariya ;
Kang, Keon Wook ;
Chung, June-Key .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2011, 52 (01) :21-28