Patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction: how much do timing and surgical technique matter?

被引:8
作者
Brito, Iris M. [1 ,2 ]
Fernandes, Andreia [3 ]
Andresen, Carolina [4 ]
Barbosa, Rui [5 ]
Ribeiro, Matilde [5 ]
Valenca-Filipe, Rita [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Coimbra Univ, Hosp Ctr, Dept Plast Surg, Coimbra, Portugal
[2] Coimbra Univ, Hosp Ctr, Burns Unit, Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Univ Porto, Fac Med, Porto, Portugal
[4] Gaia Espinho Hosp Ctr, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Craniomaxillofacial Surg, Vila Nova De Gaia, Portugal
[5] Portuguese Inst Oncol Porto, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Porto, Portugal
关键词
Breast reconstruction; Patient satisfaction; BREAST-Q (TM); Timing of reconstruction; Reconstructive technique; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; IMMEDIATE; OUTCOMES; COMPLICATIONS; MASTECTOMY; SURGERY; CONTROVERSIES; FLAP; DIEP; TRAM;
D O I
10.1007/s00238-020-01663-7
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Breast reconstruction (BR) has revealed significant benefits on physical and psychological well-being. Satisfaction is currently a key outcome on BR. This study aimed to assess the impact of timing and reconstructive technique on satisfaction, monitoring the influence of patient's characteristics and complications. Methods A single-center study of women undergoing primary BR over a 4.5-year period was conducted. Demographics, clinical features, procedural data, and postoperative complications were assessed. Patient satisfaction was evaluated with the BREAST-Q (TM). Influence of BR timing (immediate vs. delayed) and surgical technique (autologous vs. implant-based) on satisfaction was analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of satisfaction. Results Global response rate to BREAST-Q (TM) was 76.1% (216 from 284 patients). Responders underwent delayed BR in 67.6%, and autologous BR in 68.5%, with a 30.1% overall complication rate. Timing demonstrated significant impact on satisfaction (p = 0.001), with delayed reconstruction showing a higher mean BREAST-Q (TM) score. Autologous reconstruction also had a significantly higher BREAST-Q (TM) (p = 0.002). Transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap presented the highest score, followed by latissimus dorsi with implant, and implant-based showed the lowest satisfaction (p = 0.004). Multivariate regression analysis identified timing, minor complications, and smoking status as independent impact factors of satisfaction (p = 0.001, p = 0.043, and p = 0.011, respectively). Conclusions Timing significantly affected satisfaction (delayed reconstruction evidencing positive influence). Technique did not reach significance as independent predictor. Smoking and minor complications showed negative influence. Meaningful satisfaction with delayed reconstruction may encourage BR in the majority of patients, even those with medical or oncologic risks that precluded immediate reconstruction. Level of evidence: Not ratable.
引用
收藏
页码:809 / 818
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: Two-year results of the Michigan breast reconstruction outcome study [J].
Alderman, AK ;
Wilkins, EG ;
Kim, HM ;
Lowery, JC .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 109 (07) :2265-2274
[2]   Does patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction change over time? Two-year results of the Michigan breast reconstruction outcomes study [J].
Alderman, Amy K. ;
Kuhn, Latoya E. ;
Lowery, Julie C. ;
Wilkins, Edwin G. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2007, 204 (01) :7-12
[3]   Clinical determinants of patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction [J].
Andrade, WN ;
Baxter, N ;
Semple, JL .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 107 (01) :46-54
[4]   Prospective analysis of long-term psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction - Two-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study [J].
Atisha, Dunya ;
Alderman, Amy K. ;
Lowery, Julie C. ;
Kuhn, Latoya E. ;
Davis, Jenny ;
Wilkins, Edwin G. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2008, 247 (06) :1019-1028
[5]   Analysis of Symmetry Stability Following Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction and Contralateral Management in 582 Patients with Long-Term Outcomes [J].
Barone, M. ;
Cogliandro, A. ;
Signoretti, M. ;
Persichetti, P. .
AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2018, 42 (04) :936-940
[6]   ANALYSIS OF PATIENT SATISFACTION AND DONOR-SITE MORBIDITY AFTER DIFFERENT TYPES OF BREAST RECONSTRUCTION [J].
Benditte-Klepetko, H. C. ;
Lutgendorff, F. ;
Kastenbauer, T. ;
Deutinger, M. ;
van der Horst, C. M. A. M. .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 103 (04) :249-255
[7]   Comparison of 2-Year Complication Rates Among Common Techniques for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction [J].
Bennett, Katelyn G. ;
Qi, Ji ;
Kim, Hyungjin M. ;
Hamill, Jennifer B. ;
Pusic, Andrea L. ;
Wilkins, Edwin G. .
JAMA SURGERY, 2018, 153 (10) :901-908
[8]   Quality of Life of Patients After Immediate or Delayed Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Study [J].
Beugels, Jop ;
Kool, Melissa ;
Hoekstra, Lisette T. ;
Heuts, Esther M. ;
Tuinder, Stephania M. H. ;
van der Hulst, Rene R. W. J. ;
Piatkowski, Andrzej .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2018, 81 (05) :523-527
[9]   The association between complications and quality of life after mastectomy and breast reconstruction for breast cancer [J].
Browne, John P. ;
Jeevan, Ranjeet ;
Gulliver-Clarke, Carmel ;
Pereira, Jerome ;
Caddy, Christopher M. ;
van der Meulen, Jan H. P. .
CANCER, 2017, 123 (18) :3460-3467
[10]   The Science behind Quality-of-Life Measurement: A Primer for Plastic Surgeons [J].
Cano, Stefan J. ;
Klassen, Anne ;
Pusic, Andrea L. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 123 (03) :98E-106E