Participatory design of digital innovation in agricultural research-for-development: insights from practice

被引:22
|
作者
Steinke, Jonathan [1 ]
Ortiz-Crespo, Berta [1 ]
van Etten, Jacob [1 ]
Muller, Anna [1 ]
机构
[1] Alliance Biovers Int & CIAT, Digital Inclus, Montpellier, France
关键词
ICT4Ag; Smart farming; User-centered design; Digital development; INFORMATION; FAILURE; SYSTEMS; REFLECTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103313
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
CONTEXT: Innovation based on information and communication technology (ICT) plays an increasingly important role in agricultural research-for-development efforts. It has been recognized, however, that the weak adoption and low impact of many ICT-for-agriculture (ICT4Ag) efforts are partly due to poor design. Often, design was driven more by technological feasibility than by a thorough analysis of the target group's needs and capacities. For more user-centered ICT4Ag development, there is now growing interest in the use of systematic, participatory design methodologies. OBJECTIVE: Numerous methodologies for participatory design exist, but applying any of them in smallholder farming context can create specific challenges that digital development researchers need to deal with. This article aims to support future digital development efforts by contributing practical insights to recent discussions on the use of participatory design methodologies for ICT4Ag development. METHODS: We present lessons learned from practical experiences within participatory design projects that developed ICT4Ag solutions in sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America. Based on these experiences and supported by literature, we describe common challenges and limitations that digital designers may face in practice, and discuss possible opportunities for dealing with them. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of digital design projects within research-for-development efforts can be affected by tensions between design ideals and project realities. These tensions may relate to, among others, mismatching expectations among project stakeholders, top-down hierarchies at design partners, insuf- ficient attention to the wider digital ecosystem, and disincentives to re-use ideas and software. Depending on project context, these challenges may need to be addressed by researchers during planning and implementation of digital design projects. SIGNIFICANCE: The insights in this article may support agricultural development researchers in facilitating more effective participatory design processes. Even though good design is not the only precondition for a successful ICT4Ag service, this can help create more meaningful digital innovation for agricultural development.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Playful Collaborative Exploration: New Research Practice in Participatory Design
    Johansson, Martin
    Linde, Per
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH PRACTICE, 2005, 1 (01):
  • [42] On the Development of Innovation Ability and Design Practice Teach
    Ying, Hu
    2012 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SOCIAL SCIENCE (ICASS 2012), VOL 1, 2012, : 275 - 279
  • [43] Design Innovation for the Built Environment: Research by Design and the Renovation of Practice
    Lemer, Andrew
    CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2013, 31 (04) : 386 - 388
  • [44] Architectural Design and Open Innovation Symbiosis: Insights from Research Campuses, Manufacturing Systems, and Innovation Districts
    Yun, JinHyo Joseph
    Zhao, Xiaofei
    Yigitcanlar, Tan
    Lee, DooSeok
    Ahn, HeungJu
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (12)
  • [45] What knowledge counts? Insights from an action research project using participatory video with grassroots innovation experiences
    Boni, Alejandra
    Leivas, Monique
    Talon, Alba
    De La Fuente, Teresa
    Pellicer-Sifres, Victoria
    Belda-Miquel, Sergio
    Lopez-Fogues, Aurora
    Arias, Begona
    21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INDICATORS (STI 2016), 2016, : 981 - 989
  • [46] Users' Perceptions of a Digital Stress Self-monitoring Application: Research Insights to Design a Practical Innovation
    Smitt, Myriam Sillevis
    Montakhabi, Mehdi
    Morton, Jessica
    van Leeuwen, Cora
    Bombeke, Klaas
    Jacobs, An
    UNIVERSAL ACCESS IN HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION: NOVEL DESIGN APPROACHES AND TECHNOLOGIES, UAHCI 2022, PT I, 2022, 13308 : 325 - 341
  • [47] Translating the Principle of Beneficence into Ethical Participatory Development Research Practice
    Brear, Michelle R.
    Gordon, Rebecca
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 33 (01) : 109 - 126
  • [48] Editorial Introduction: critical reflection on and learning from Agricultural Innovation Systems (AIS) Approaches and emerging Agricultural Research for Development (AR4D) practice
    Maru, Yiheyis Taddele
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2018, 165 : 294 - 295
  • [49] Research on the Impact of the Digital Economy and Technological Innovation on Agricultural Carbon Emissions
    Li, Jian
    Sheng, Xiangchen
    Zhang, Shuhua
    Wang, Yixuan
    LAND, 2024, 13 (06)
  • [50] Time for a "design turn" in IS innovation research? A practice report from the home front
    Wastell, David
    Sauer, Juergen
    Schmeink, Claudia
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & PEOPLE, 2009, 22 (04) : 335 - 350