Participatory design of digital innovation in agricultural research-for-development: insights from practice

被引:22
|
作者
Steinke, Jonathan [1 ]
Ortiz-Crespo, Berta [1 ]
van Etten, Jacob [1 ]
Muller, Anna [1 ]
机构
[1] Alliance Biovers Int & CIAT, Digital Inclus, Montpellier, France
关键词
ICT4Ag; Smart farming; User-centered design; Digital development; INFORMATION; FAILURE; SYSTEMS; REFLECTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103313
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
CONTEXT: Innovation based on information and communication technology (ICT) plays an increasingly important role in agricultural research-for-development efforts. It has been recognized, however, that the weak adoption and low impact of many ICT-for-agriculture (ICT4Ag) efforts are partly due to poor design. Often, design was driven more by technological feasibility than by a thorough analysis of the target group's needs and capacities. For more user-centered ICT4Ag development, there is now growing interest in the use of systematic, participatory design methodologies. OBJECTIVE: Numerous methodologies for participatory design exist, but applying any of them in smallholder farming context can create specific challenges that digital development researchers need to deal with. This article aims to support future digital development efforts by contributing practical insights to recent discussions on the use of participatory design methodologies for ICT4Ag development. METHODS: We present lessons learned from practical experiences within participatory design projects that developed ICT4Ag solutions in sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America. Based on these experiences and supported by literature, we describe common challenges and limitations that digital designers may face in practice, and discuss possible opportunities for dealing with them. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of digital design projects within research-for-development efforts can be affected by tensions between design ideals and project realities. These tensions may relate to, among others, mismatching expectations among project stakeholders, top-down hierarchies at design partners, insuf- ficient attention to the wider digital ecosystem, and disincentives to re-use ideas and software. Depending on project context, these challenges may need to be addressed by researchers during planning and implementation of digital design projects. SIGNIFICANCE: The insights in this article may support agricultural development researchers in facilitating more effective participatory design processes. Even though good design is not the only precondition for a successful ICT4Ag service, this can help create more meaningful digital innovation for agricultural development.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Participatory Design and Technologies for Sustainable Development: an Approach from Action Research
    Acero Lopez, Andres Esteban
    Ramirez Cajiao, Maria Catalina
    Peralta Mejia, Mauricio
    Payan Duran, Luisa Fernanda
    Espinosa Diaz, Edier Ernesto
    SYSTEMIC PRACTICE AND ACTION RESEARCH, 2019, 32 (02) : 167 - 191
  • [22] Facilitating integrated agricultural technology development through participatory research
    Otte, Pia Piroschka
    Bernardo, Ricardo
    Phinney, Randi
    Davidsson, Henrik
    Tivana, Lucas Daniel
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION & EXTENSION, 2018, 24 (03): : 285 - 299
  • [23] Public sector innovation through design thinking: Applying a participatory policy design practice to support the formulation of a national digital transformation strategy
    Routzouni, Athanasia
    Vasilakis, Nikolaos Dimitrios
    Kapetanakis, Spiros
    Gritzalis, Stefanos
    Pouloudi, Athanasia
    14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THEORY AND PRACTICE OF ELECTRONIC GOVERNANCE (ICEGOV 2021), 2021, : 104 - 110
  • [24] Roles of Digital Innovation in Design Science Research
    Alan Hevner
    Jan vom Brocke
    Alexander Maedche
    Business & Information Systems Engineering, 2019, 61 : 3 - 8
  • [25] Roles of Digital Innovation in Design Science Research
    Hevner, Alan
    vom Brocke, Jan
    Maedche, Alexander
    BUSINESS & INFORMATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2019, 61 (01) : 3 - 8
  • [26] The Research and Practice Framework for Designing the Digital Social Innovation
    Fu, Zhiyong
    Huang, Zirui
    CROSS-CULTURAL DESIGN: METHODS, PRACTICE AND IMPACT, CCD 2015, PT I, 2015, 9180 : 303 - 315
  • [27] Applying insights from participatory design to design implementation strategies
    Beidas, Rinad S.
    Williams, Nathaniel
    Stewart, Rebecca
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2020, 15
  • [28] Unpacking the innovation toolbox for design research and practice
    Montagna, Francesca
    Cantamessa, Marco
    DESIGN SCIENCE, 2019, 5
  • [29] Creative Innovation Design Teaching Research and Practice
    Ren, Cheng-yuan
    Du, Jin-ling
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION REFORM AND MODERN MANAGEMENT, 2016, 2016, : 16 - 20
  • [30] Gender norms and agricultural innovation Insights from Uganda
    Rietveld, Anne
    SUSTAINABLE INTENSIFICATION IN SMALLHOLDER AGRICULTURE: AN INTEGRATED SYSTEMS RESEARCH APPROACH, 2017, : 289 - 303