Participatory design of digital innovation in agricultural research-for-development: insights from practice

被引:22
|
作者
Steinke, Jonathan [1 ]
Ortiz-Crespo, Berta [1 ]
van Etten, Jacob [1 ]
Muller, Anna [1 ]
机构
[1] Alliance Biovers Int & CIAT, Digital Inclus, Montpellier, France
关键词
ICT4Ag; Smart farming; User-centered design; Digital development; INFORMATION; FAILURE; SYSTEMS; REFLECTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103313
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
CONTEXT: Innovation based on information and communication technology (ICT) plays an increasingly important role in agricultural research-for-development efforts. It has been recognized, however, that the weak adoption and low impact of many ICT-for-agriculture (ICT4Ag) efforts are partly due to poor design. Often, design was driven more by technological feasibility than by a thorough analysis of the target group's needs and capacities. For more user-centered ICT4Ag development, there is now growing interest in the use of systematic, participatory design methodologies. OBJECTIVE: Numerous methodologies for participatory design exist, but applying any of them in smallholder farming context can create specific challenges that digital development researchers need to deal with. This article aims to support future digital development efforts by contributing practical insights to recent discussions on the use of participatory design methodologies for ICT4Ag development. METHODS: We present lessons learned from practical experiences within participatory design projects that developed ICT4Ag solutions in sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America. Based on these experiences and supported by literature, we describe common challenges and limitations that digital designers may face in practice, and discuss possible opportunities for dealing with them. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of digital design projects within research-for-development efforts can be affected by tensions between design ideals and project realities. These tensions may relate to, among others, mismatching expectations among project stakeholders, top-down hierarchies at design partners, insuf- ficient attention to the wider digital ecosystem, and disincentives to re-use ideas and software. Depending on project context, these challenges may need to be addressed by researchers during planning and implementation of digital design projects. SIGNIFICANCE: The insights in this article may support agricultural development researchers in facilitating more effective participatory design processes. Even though good design is not the only precondition for a successful ICT4Ag service, this can help create more meaningful digital innovation for agricultural development.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Utilization of research knowledge in sustainable development pathways: Insights from a transdisciplinary research-for-development programme
    Jacobi, J.
    Llanque, A.
    Bieri, S.
    Birachi, E.
    Cochard, R.
    Chauvin, N. Depetris
    Diebold, C.
    Eschen, R.
    Frossard, E.
    Guillaume, T.
    Jaquet, S.
    Kaempfen, F.
    Kenis, M.
    Kiba, D., I
    Komarudin, H.
    Madrazo, J.
    Manoli, G.
    Mukhovi, S. M.
    Nguyen, V. T. H.
    Pomalegni, C.
    Rueegger, S.
    Schneider, F.
    TriDung, N.
    von Groote, P.
    Winkler, M. S.
    Zaehringer, J. G.
    Robledo-Abad, C.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2020, 103 : 21 - 29
  • [2] Scaling up research-for-development innovations in food and agricultural systems
    Shilomboleni, Helena
    De Plaen, Renaud
    DEVELOPMENT IN PRACTICE, 2019, 29 (06) : 723 - 734
  • [3] Plant different, eat different? Insights from participatory agricultural research
    Azzarri, Carlo
    Haile, Beliyou
    Letta, Marco
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (03):
  • [4] Understanding methodological innovation in participatory research: insights from participatory EU-funded projects
    Mendes, Ana Barbosa
    Bruns, Charlotte
    Mahr, Dana
    Driessen, Simone
    JCOM-JOURNAL OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2024, 23 (06):
  • [5] Digital innovation: transforming research and practice
    Bogers, Marcel L. A. M.
    Garud, Raghu
    Thomas, Llewellyn D. W.
    Tuertscher, Philipp
    Yoo, Youngjin
    INNOVATION-ORGANIZATION & MANAGEMENT, 2022, 24 (01): : 4 - 12
  • [6] Digital platforms for connecting actors in the agtech space: insights on platform development from participatory action research on KisanMitr
    Poti, Sapna
    Joy, Simy
    JOURNAL OF INDIAN BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2022, 14 (01) : 65 - 83
  • [7] Who benefits from which agricultural research-for-development technologies? Evidence from farm household poverty analysis in Central Africa
    Ainembabazi, John Herbert
    Abdoulaye, Tahirou
    Feleke, Shiferaw
    Alene, Arega
    Dontsop-Nguezet, Paul M.
    Ndayisaba, Pierre Celestin
    Hicintuka, Cyrille
    Mapatano, Sylvain
    Manyong, Victor
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 108 : 28 - 46
  • [8] Navigating the participatory turn in agricultural and food research: Best practice from citizen science
    Ajates, Raquel
    Benyei, Petra
    Avery, Helen
    Butkeviciene, Egle
    Czegledi, Alexandra
    Desclaux, Dominique
    Hager, Gerid
    Heinisch, Barbara
    Hoebe, Peter N.
    van Noordwijk, Toos C. G. E.
    Barzman, Marco
    AMBIO, 2025,
  • [9] Participatory design: lessons and directions for responsible research and innovation
    Ten Holter, Carolyn
    JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION, 2022, 9 (02) : 275 - 290
  • [10] Development of a tool to identify barriers and enablers to practice innovation in midwifery: A participatory action research study
    Davis, Sara D.
    Bayes, Sara
    Geraghty, Sadie
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY, 2023, 7