Responsiveness of the 24-, 18-and 11-item versions of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire

被引：40

作者：

Macedo, Luciana Gazzi ^{[1
]}

Maher, Chris G. ^{[1
]}

Latimer, Jane ^{[1
]}

Hancock, Mark J. ^{[2
]}

Machado, Luciana A. C. ^{[3
]}

McAuley, James H. ^{[4
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Sydney, George Inst Global Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia

[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Lidcombe, NSW 1825, Australia

[3] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Escola Educ Fis Fisioterapia & Terapia Ocupac, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil

[4] Univ New S Wales, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia

来源：

EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL | 2011年 / 20卷 / 03期

基金：

英国医学研究理事会; 澳大利亚研究理事会;

关键词：

Low back pain; Questionnaires; ROC curve; Validity; LOW-BACK-PAIN; SPINAL MANIPULATIVE THERAPY; DIFFERENCE; EXERCISE;

D O I：

10.1007/s00586-010-1608-2

中图分类号：

R74 [神经病学与精神病学];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Several versions of the 24-item Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) have been proposed; however, their responsiveness has not been extensively explored. The objective of this study was to compare the responsiveness of four versions of the RMDQ. Perceived disability was measured using the 24-item, two 18-item and an 11-item RMDQ on 1,069 low back pain patients from six randomised controlled trials. Responsiveness was calculated using effect size, Guyatt's responsiveness index (GRI) and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. Effect size analyses showed that both 18-item versions of the RMDQ were superior to the 24- and 11-item versions of the RMDQ. GRI showed that the 24- and 18-item versions of the RMDQ were similar but more responsive than the 11-item. ROC curves revealed that the 11-item was less responsive than the other three versions, which had similar responsiveness. The results of this study demonstrate that the 24-item and both 18-item versions of the RMDQ have similar responsiveness with all having superior responsiveness to the 11-item.

引用

页码：458 / 463

页数：6

共 24 条

[1]

[Anonymous], HONG KONG ROC PROGRA

[2] Reliability and stability of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire:: intra class correlation and limits of agreement [J].

Brouwer, S ;

Kuijer, W ;

Dijkstra, PU ;

Göeken, LNH ;

Groothoff, JW ;

Geertzen, JHB .

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2004, 26 (03) :162-165

[3] Comparison of the Functional Rating Index and the 18-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire: Responsiveness and reliability [J].

Chansirinukor, W ;

Maher, CG ;

Latimer, J ;

Hush, J .

SPINE, 2005, 30 (01) :141-145

[4]

Cohen J., 2003, APPL MULTIPLE REGRES, VThird ed., DOI 10.4324/9780203774441

[5]

Costa LOP, 2009, PHYS THER, V89, P1275, DOI 10.2522/ptj.20090218

[6] Rasch analysis of 24-, 18-and 11-item versions of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire [J].

Davidson, Megan .

QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2009, 18 (04) :473-481

[7] COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].

DELONG, ER ;

DELONG, DM ;

CLARKEPEARSON, DI .

BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845

[8] Comparison of general exercise, motor control exercise and spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low back pain: A randomized trial [J].

Ferreira, Manuela L. ;

Ferreira, Paulo H. ;

Latimer, Jane ;

Herbert, Robert D. ;

Hodges, Paul W. ;

Jennings, Matthew D. ;

Maher, Christopher G. ;

Refshauge, Kathryn M. .

PAIN, 2007, 131 (1-2) :31-37

[9] MEASURING CHANGE OVER TIME - ASSESSING THE USEFULNESS OF EVALUATIVE INSTRUMENTS [J].

GUYATT, G ;

WALTER, S ;

NORMAN, G .

JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (02) :171-178

[10] A SECOND LOOK AT THE RISKS OF SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS WITH ORTHOPAEDIC MANUAL THERAPY, PARACETAMOL, AND NSAID TREATMENT OF NECK PAIN [J].

Maher, Chris ;

McLachlan, Andrew ;

Shaheed, Christina Abdel .

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2023, 53 (06) :369-369

← 1 2 3 →