Responsiveness of the 24-, 18-and 11-item versions of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire

被引：38
作者：
Macedo, Luciana Gazzi [1 ]
Maher, Chris G. [1 ]
Latimer, Jane [1 ]
Hancock, Mark J. [2 ]
Machado, Luciana A. C. [3 ]
McAuley, James H. [4 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Sydney, George Inst Global Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Lidcombe, NSW 1825, Australia
[3] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Escola Educ Fis Fisioterapia & Terapia Ocupac, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[4] Univ New S Wales, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
来源：
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL | 2011年 / 20卷 / 03期
基金：
澳大利亚研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词：
Low back pain; Questionnaires; ROC curve; Validity; LOW-BACK-PAIN; SPINAL MANIPULATIVE THERAPY; DIFFERENCE; EXERCISE;
D O I：
10.1007/s00586-010-1608-2
中图分类号：
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号：
摘要：
Several versions of the 24-item Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) have been proposed; however, their responsiveness has not been extensively explored. The objective of this study was to compare the responsiveness of four versions of the RMDQ. Perceived disability was measured using the 24-item, two 18-item and an 11-item RMDQ on 1,069 low back pain patients from six randomised controlled trials. Responsiveness was calculated using effect size, Guyatt's responsiveness index (GRI) and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. Effect size analyses showed that both 18-item versions of the RMDQ were superior to the 24- and 11-item versions of the RMDQ. GRI showed that the 24- and 18-item versions of the RMDQ were similar but more responsive than the 11-item. ROC curves revealed that the 11-item was less responsive than the other three versions, which had similar responsiveness. The results of this study demonstrate that the 24-item and both 18-item versions of the RMDQ have similar responsiveness with all having superior responsiveness to the 11-item.
引用
收藏
页码：458 / 463
页数：6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], HONG KONG ROC PROGRA
  • [2] Reliability and stability of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire:: intra class correlation and limits of agreement
    Brouwer, S
    Kuijer, W
    Dijkstra, PU
    Göeken, LNH
    Groothoff, JW
    Geertzen, JHB
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2004, 26 (03): : 162 - 165
  • [3] Comparison of the Functional Rating Index and the 18-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire: Responsiveness and reliability
    Chansirinukor, W
    Maher, CG
    Latimer, J
    Hush, J
    [J]. SPINE, 2005, 30 (01) : 141 - 145
  • [4] Cohen J., 2003, APPL MULTIPLE REGRES, VThird ed., DOI 10.4324/9780203774441
  • [5] Motor Control Exercise for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Costa, Leonardo O. P.
    Maher, Christopher G.
    Latimer, Jane
    Hodges, Paul W.
    Herbert, Robert D.
    Refshauge, Kathryn M.
    McAuley, James H.
    Jennings, Matthew D.
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2009, 89 (12): : 1275 - 1286
  • [6] Rasch analysis of 24-, 18-and 11-item versions of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire
    Davidson, Megan
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2009, 18 (04) : 473 - 481
  • [7] COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH
    DELONG, ER
    DELONG, DM
    CLARKEPEARSON, DI
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) : 837 - 845
  • [8] Comparison of general exercise, motor control exercise and spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low back pain: A randomized trial
    Ferreira, Manuela L.
    Ferreira, Paulo H.
    Latimer, Jane
    Herbert, Robert D.
    Hodges, Paul W.
    Jennings, Matthew D.
    Maher, Christopher G.
    Refshauge, Kathryn M.
    [J]. PAIN, 2007, 131 (1-2) : 31 - 37
  • [9] MEASURING CHANGE OVER TIME - ASSESSING THE USEFULNESS OF EVALUATIVE INSTRUMENTS
    GUYATT, G
    WALTER, S
    NORMAN, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (02): : 171 - 178
  • [10] Hancock MJ, 2007, LANCET, V370, P1638, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61686-9
123