Cross-sectional study of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 studies: discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation

被引:31
作者
Bero, Lisa [1 ]
Lawrence, Rosa [2 ]
Leslie, Louis [2 ]
Chiu, Kellia [3 ,4 ]
McDonald, Sally [3 ,4 ]
Page, Matthew J. [5 ]
Grundy, Quinn [6 ]
Parker, Lisa [7 ]
Boughton, Stephanie [8 ]
Kirkham, Jamie J. [9 ]
Featherstone, Robin [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Ctr Bioeth & Humanities, Gen Internal Med, Publ Hlth, Anschutz Med Campus, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Ctr Bioeth & Humanities, Anschutz Med Ctr, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Charles Perkins Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sch Pharm, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Univ Sydney, Fac Nursing, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Sydney, Charles Perkins Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[8] Cochrane, Editorial & Methods Dept, London, England
[9] Univ Manchester, Biostat, Manchester, Lancs, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 07期
关键词
ethics (see Medical Ethics); public health; qualitative research; OUTCOMES; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051821
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To compare results reporting and the presence of spin in COVID-19 study preprints with their finalised journal publications. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting International medical literature. Participants Preprints and final journal publications of 67 interventional and observational studies of COVID-19 treatment or prevention from the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register published between 1 March 2020 and 30 October 2020. Main outcome measures Study characteristics and discrepancies in (1) results reporting (number of outcomes, outcome descriptor, measure, metric, assessment time point, data reported, reported statistical significance of result, type of statistical analysis, subgroup analyses (if any), whether outcome was identified as primary or secondary) and (2) spin (reporting practices that distort the interpretation of results so they are viewed more favourably). Results Of 67 included studies, 23 (34%) had no discrepancies in results reporting between preprints and journal publications. Fifteen (22%) studies had at least one outcome that was included in the journal publication, but not the preprint; eight (12%) had at least one outcome that was reported in the preprint only. For outcomes that were reported in both preprints and journals, common discrepancies were differences in numerical values and statistical significance, additional statistical tests and subgroup analyses and longer follow-up times for outcome assessment in journal publications. At least one instance of spin occurred in both preprints and journals in 23/67 (34%) studies, the preprint only in 5 (7%), and the journal publications only in 2 (3%). Spin was removed between the preprint and journal publication in 5/67 (7%) studies; but added in 1/67 (1%) study. Conclusions The COVID-19 preprints and their subsequent journal publications were largely similar in reporting of study characteristics, outcomes and spin. All COVID-19 studies published as preprints and journal publications should be critically evaluated for discrepancies and spin.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Agarwal A., 2020, CONVALESCENT PLASMA, DOI DOI 10.1101/2020.09.03.20187252
  • [2] Convalescent plasma in the management of moderate covid-19 in adults in India: open label phase II multicentre randomised controlled trial (PLACID Trial)
    Agarwal, Anup
    Mukherjee, Aparna
    Kumar, Gunjan
    Chatterjee, Pranab
    Bhatnagar, Tarun
    Malhotra, Pankaj
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 371
  • [3] All that's fit to preprint
    不详
    [J]. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2020, 38 (05) : 507 - 507
  • [4] [Anonymous], STAT
  • [5] Bero L., 2020, COMP PREPRINTS PEER
  • [6] Shepherding preprints through a pandemic
    Bloom, Theodora
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 371
  • [7] Borba M. G. S., 2020, medRxiv, DOI 10.1101/2020.04.07.20056424
  • [8] Effect of High vs Low Doses of Chloroquine Diphosphate as Adjunctive Therapy for Patients Hospitalized With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Borba, Mayla Gabriela Silva
    Val, Fernando Fonseca Almeida
    Sampaio, Vanderson Souza
    Alexandre, Marcia Almeida Araujo
    Melo, Gisely Cardoso
    Brito, Marcelo
    Mourao, Maria Paula Gomes
    Brito-Sousa, Jose Diego
    Baia-da-Silva, Djane
    Guerra, Marcus Vinitius Farias
    Hajjar, Ludhmila Abrahao
    Pinto, Rosemary Costa
    Balieiro, Antonio Alcirley Silva
    Pacheco, Antonio Guilherme Fonseca
    Santos, James Dean Oliveira, Jr.
    Naveca, Felipe Gomes
    Xavier, Mariana Simao
    Siqueira, Andre Machado
    Schwarzbold, Alexandre
    Croda, Julio
    Nogueira, Mauricio Lacerda
    Romero, Gustavo Adolfo Sierra
    Bassat, Quique
    Fontes, Cor Jesus
    Albuquerque, Bernardino Claudio
    Daniel-Ribeiro, Claudio-Tadeu
    Monteiro, Wuelton Marcelo
    Lacerda, Marcus Vinicius Guimaraes
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (04) : E208857
  • [9] Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature
    Boutron, Isabelle
    Ravaud, Philippe
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2018, 115 (11) : 2613 - 2619
  • [10] Carneiro CFD, 2020, RES INTEGR PEER REV, V0005