Mobile robot path planning using fuzzy enhanced improved Multi-Objective particle swarm optimization (FIMOPSO)

被引:34
作者
Sathiya, V [1 ]
Chinnadurai, M. [2 ]
Ramabalan, S. [3 ]
机构
[1] EGS Pillay Engn Coll, Dept Elect & Commun Engn, Nagapattinam 611002, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] EGS Pillay Engn Coll, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Nagapattinam 611002, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] EGS Pillay Engn Coll, Dept Mech Engn, Nagapattinam 611002, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Car-like robot path planning; FIMOPSO; MOSPEA2; Non-holonomic and kinodynamic constraints; Static and dynamic environments;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116875
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper introduces a method for car-like mobile robot path planning (CRPP). The robot works in both dynamic and static situations. The aim of this method is to explore the best safe path with minimum path length, minimum motor torque, minimum travel time, minimum robot acceleration and maximum obstacle avoidance. Kinody-namic and non-holonomic constraints related with car-like robot are considered. Fuzzy enhanced Improved Multi-objective Particle Swarm Optimization (FIMOPSO) algorithm is proposed to solve the CRPP problem. Fuzzy inference system is used for obstacle avoidance. In the proposed FIMOPSO, five improvements are made. Proposed technique is compared with Multi-objective Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm 2 (MOSPEA2) technique. Experiments on a custom-made car-like robot are ensuring the quality of proposed technique. This research works show that proposed FIMOPSO is another alternative technique to CRPP problems. Paths dictated by FIMOPSO are safe, collision free, feasible, and possible and can be practically implemented. Fuzzy inference system works well for safe robot travel. FIMOPSO simulation paths are acceptable. Since, the deviation between experiment and simulation is less than 2%.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] A comparative review on mobile robot path planning: Classical or meta-heuristic methods?
    Ab Wahab, Mohd Nadhir
    Nefti-Meziani, Samia
    Atyabi, Adham
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEWS IN CONTROL, 2020, 50 : 233 - 252
  • [2] Ah King R. T. F., 2010, U MAURITIUS RES J, V16, P1
  • [3] Multi-objective optimal path planning using elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithms
    Ahmed, Faez
    Deb, Kalyanmoy
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING, 2013, 17 (07) : 1283 - 1299
  • [4] Multi-objective path planning of an autonomous mobile robot using hybrid PSO-MFB optimization algorithm
    Ajeil, Fatin H.
    Ibraheem, Ibraheem Kasim
    Sahib, Mouayad A.
    Humaidi, Amjad J.
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2020, 89
  • [5] Mobile robots path planning: Electrostatic potential field approach
    Bayat, Farhad
    Najafinia, Sepideh
    Aliyari, Morteza
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2018, 100 : 68 - 78
  • [6] Dao K, 2016, INT CONF SIGN PROCES, P337, DOI 10.1109/ICSP.2016.7877851
  • [7] Durillo JJ, 2009, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5467, P495, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-01020-0_39
  • [8] Eberhart R., 1995, MHS 95, P39, DOI [DOI 10.1109/MHS.1995.494215, 10.1109/MHS.1995.494215]
  • [9] Feiyi Xu, 2020, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V88
  • [10] Solving the multi-objective path planning problem in mobile robotics with a firefly-based approach
    Hidalgo-Paniagua, Alejandro
    Vega-Rodriguez, Miguel A.
    Ferruz, Joaquin
    Pavon, Nieves
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING, 2017, 21 (04) : 949 - 964