Testing and refining the Science in Risk Assessment and Policy (SciRAP) web-based platform for evaluating the reliability and relevance of in vivo toxicity studies

被引:26
作者
Beronius, Anna [1 ]
Molander, Linda [2 ]
Zilliacus, Johanna [1 ]
Ruden, Christina [3 ]
Hanberg, Annika [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Inst Environm Med, Box 210, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Publ Hlth Agcy Sweden, Solna, Sweden
[3] Stockholm Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Analyt Chem, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
evidence appraisal; expert judgement; risk assessment; SciRAP; study quality; study relevance; study reliability; toxicity studies; ENVIRONMENTAL-HEALTH SCIENCE; WEIGHT; RECOMMENDATIONS; CHEMICALS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1002/jat.3648
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
The Science in Risk Assessment and Policy (SciRAP) web-based platform was developed to promote and facilitate structure and transparency in the evaluation of ecotoxicity and toxicity studies for hazard and risk assessment of chemicals. The platform includes sets of criteria and a colour-coding tool for evaluating the reliability and relevance of individual studies. The SciRAP method for evaluating in vivo toxicity studies was first published in 2014 and the aim of the work presented here was to evaluate and develop that method further. Toxicologists and risk assessors from different sectors and geographical areas were invited to test the SciRAP criteria and tool on a specific set of in vivo toxicity studies and to provide feedback concerning the scientific soundness and user-friendliness of the SciRAP approach. The results of this expert assessment were used to refine and improve both the evaluation criteria and the colour-coding tool. It is expected that the SciRAP web-based platform will continue to be developed and enhanced to keep up to date with the needs of end-users.
引用
收藏
页码:1460 / 1470
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Understanding the mismatch between the demands of risk assessment and practice of scientists - The case of Deca-BDE [J].
Alcock, Ruth E. ;
MacGillivray, Brian H. ;
Busby, Jerry S. .
ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 37 (01) :216-225
[2]  
[Anonymous], SCIRAP WORKSH REP BR
[3]   Making the most of expert judgment in hazard and risk assessment of chemicals [J].
Beronius, A. ;
Agerstrand, M. .
TOXICOLOGY RESEARCH, 2017, 6 (05) :571-577
[4]   Facilitating the use of non-standard in vivo studies in health risk assessment of chemicals: a proposal to improve evaluation criteria and reporting [J].
Beronius, Anna ;
Molander, Linda ;
Ruden, Christina ;
Hanberg, Annika .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 2014, 34 (06) :607-617
[5]   Risk to all or none? A comparative analysis of controversies in the health risk assessment of Bisphenol A [J].
Beronius, Anna ;
Ruden, Christina ;
Hakansson, Helen ;
Hanberg, Annika .
REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY, 2010, 29 (02) :132-146
[6]   Pesticide Regulation amid the Influence of Industry [J].
Boone, Michelle D. ;
Bishop, Christine A. ;
Boswell, Leigh A. ;
Brodman, Robert D. ;
Burger, Joanna ;
Davidson, Carlos ;
Gochfeld, Michael ;
Hoverman, Jason T. ;
Neuman-Lee, Lorin A. ;
Relyea, Rick A. ;
Rohr, Jason R. ;
Salice, Christopher ;
Semlitsch, Raymond D. ;
Sparling, Donald ;
Weir, Scott .
BIOSCIENCE, 2014, 64 (10) :917-922
[7]   Framework for the quantitative weight-of-evidence analysis of 'omics data for regulatory purposes [J].
Bridges, Jim ;
Sauer, Ursula G. ;
Buesen, Roland ;
Deferme, Lize ;
Tollefsen, Knut E. ;
Tralau, Tewes ;
van Ravenzwaay, Ben ;
Poole, Alan ;
Pemberton, Mark .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 91 :S46-S60
[8]   SEURAT: Safety Evaluation Ultimately Replacing Animal Testing-Recommendations for future research in the field of predictive toxicology [J].
Daston, George ;
Knight, Derek J. ;
Schwarz, Michael ;
Gocht, Tilman ;
Thomas, Russell S. ;
Mahony, Catherine ;
Whelan, Maurice .
ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, 2015, 89 (01) :15-23
[9]  
ECHA, 2011, EUR CHEM AG GUID INF
[10]   Modification of the existing MRLs for difenoconazole in various leafy vegetables [J].
European Food Safety Authority .
EFSA JOURNAL, 2009, 7 (07)