Assessment of pragmatic impairment in right hemisphere damage

被引:51
作者
Parola, Alberto [1 ]
Gabbatore, Ilaria [1 ,6 ]
Bosco, Francesca M. [1 ,2 ]
Bara, Bruno G. [1 ,2 ]
Cossa, Federico M. [3 ]
Gindri, Patrizia [4 ]
Sacco, Katiuscia [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turin, Dept Psychol, Ctr Cognit Sci, I-10124 Turin, Italy
[2] Neurosci Inst Turin, Turin, Italy
[3] Fdn Salvatore Maugeri, Dipartimento Riabilitaz Neurol, Turin, Italy
[4] Presidio Sanit San Camillo, Turin, Italy
[5] Brain Imaging Grp, Turin, Italy
[6] Univ Oulu, Fac Humanities, Child Language Res Ctr, POB 1000, Oulu 90014, Finland
关键词
Communication; Assessment; Right hemisphere damage; Non-verbal; ABaCo; Pragmatic; TRAUMATIC BRAIN-INJURY; RIGHT CEREBRAL HEMISPHERE; EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS; EMOTIONAL PROSODY; COMMUNICATION; DISCOURSE; MIND; LANGUAGE; NEUROPRAGMATICS; COMPREHENSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jneuroling.2015.12.003
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Aim of the present study is to provide a multifocal assessment of pragmatic abilities in patients with right hemisphere damage (RHD). Pragmatics refers to the ability to use language and non-verbal expressive means (e.g., gestures) to convey meaning in a given context, and it also involves the appropriate use of connotative elements such as rhythm and prosody. Patients with RHD frequently report a wide range of pragmatic disorders: despite the heterogeneity of their clinical profiles, these difficulties can seriously undermine their ability to effectively communicate in everyday situations. We analysed the performance of 17 patients with RHD and 17 healthy controls using the Assessment Battery for Communication, a clinical tool for assessing a wide range of pragmatic phenomena both in comprehension and production- and considering different expressive means. The results suggest patients have difficulties both in comprehending and producing pragmatic phenomena of differing complexity; in particular, patients seem to be significantly impaired when dealing with non-verbal modality, i.e., gestures and facial expressions. Moreover a hierarchical cluster analysis revealed the presence of a number of clusters corresponding to different outcomes of pragmatic performance, in line with the heterogeneity of communicative profiles following RHD frequently reported in the literature. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 25
页数:16
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
AIRENTI G, 1993, COGNITIVE SCI, V17, P197, DOI 10.1207/s15516709cog1702_2
[2]   SIMPLE TEST OF VISUAL NEGLECT [J].
ALBERT, ML .
NEUROLOGY, 1973, 23 (06) :658-664
[3]   Communicative impairment in traumatic brain injury: A complete pragmatic assessment [J].
Angeleri, R. ;
Bosco, F. M. ;
Zettin, M. ;
Sacco, K. ;
Colle, L. ;
Bara, B. G. .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2008, 107 (03) :229-245
[4]   Assessment battery for communication (ABaCo): normative data [J].
Angeleri, Romina ;
Bosco, Francesca M. ;
Gabbatore, Ilaria ;
Bara, Bruno G. ;
Sacco, Katiuscia .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2012, 44 (03) :845-861
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, MINERVA PSICHIAT
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, PRAGMATIC DISORDERS
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2015, BATTERIA ASSESSMENT
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1983, PRAGMATICS CAMBRIDGE
[9]   Decomposing metaphor processing at the cognitive and neural level through functional magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Bambini, Valentina ;
Gentili, Claudio ;
Ricciardi, Emiliano ;
Bertinetto, Pier Marco ;
Pietrini, Pietro .
BRAIN RESEARCH BULLETIN, 2011, 86 (3-4) :203-216
[10]  
Bara B.G., 2010, Cognitive pragmatics: The mental processes of communication