The Temporoparietal Fascial Flap Is an Alternative to Free Flaps for Orbitomaxillary Reconstruction

被引:15
作者
Kim, John Y. S.
Buck, Donald W., II
Johnson, Sarah A.
Butler, Charles E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Plast Surg, Unit 443, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
SPARING TOTAL MAXILLECTOMY; INTERNAL OBLIQUE MUSCLE; FREE TISSUE TRANSFER; FREE FIBULA FLAP; ORBITAL EXENTERATION; MIDFACIAL DEFECTS; MAXILLARY RECONSTRUCTION; NECK RECONSTRUCTION; MALIGNANT-TUMORS; ANATOMY;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181e3b6f0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The temporoparietal fascial flap is a thin, pliable, well-vascularized, locoregional flap that can be a reasonable alternative to traditional free flap reconstruction, but its utility for reconstruction of orbitomaxillary defects is often overlooked. The authors investigated the rationale for and benefits of the use of this flap over free tissue transfer in a well-defined subset of head and neck cancer cases. Methods: The records of all patients who underwent temporoparietal fascial reconstruction for orbitomaxillectomy between 1993 and 2008 were reviewed. Demographic data, preoperative plans, operative details, and outcomes were assessed to (1) determine the overall outcomes for the temporoparietal fascial flap and (2) analyze preoperative and intraoperative factors that led to the choice of this flap instead of the originally planned free flap. Results: Nineteen patients (mean age, 56 years) were included in this study. Ten (53 percent) were initially considered for free flap reconstruction. Among them, the principal reasons for electing the temporoparietal fascial flap were (1) smaller-than-anticipated extent of resection, (2) need for coverage of implant or bone or thin prosthesis support, and (3) patient comorbidities. Nine resections (47 percent) involved the orbit alone, two (11 percent) involved the maxilla alone, and eight (42 percent) involved a combination of the two. Five patients (26 percent) received neoadjuvant radiation. Four (21 percent) experienced complications (flap failure, ectropion, enophthalmos with intraoral mesh extrusion, and partial skin graft loss). Mean follow-up time was 36 +/- 27 months. Conclusion: The temporoparietal fascial flap is a viable alternative to free flaps for orbitomaxillary defects when orbital resection is limited, when obturator reconstruction is desired, or when comorbidities preclude microvascular surgery. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 126: 880, 2010.)
引用
收藏
页码:880 / 888
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] ABULHASSAN HS, 1986, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V77, P17
  • [2] One-stage reconstruction of eye socket and eyelids in orbital exenteration patients
    Atabay, K
    Atabay, Ç
    Yavuzer, R
    Demirkan, F
    Latifoglu, O
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1998, 101 (06) : 1463 - 1470
  • [3] VASCULARIZED SKULL BONE-GRAFTS IN CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY
    BITE, U
    JACKSON, IT
    WAHNER, HW
    MARSH, RW
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1987, 19 (01) : 3 - 15
  • [4] EXPERIENCE WITH THE TEMPOROPARIETAL FASCIAL FREE FLAP
    BRENT, B
    UPTON, J
    ACLAND, RD
    SHAW, WW
    FINSETH, FJ
    ROGERS, C
    PEARL, RM
    HENTZ, VR
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1985, 76 (02) : 177 - 188
  • [5] Brown JS, 1996, HEAD NECK-J SCI SPEC, V18, P412, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0347(199609/10)18:5<412::AID-HED4>3.0.CO
  • [6] 2-8
  • [7] Reconstruction of large composite oromandibulomaxillary defects with free vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps
    Butler, CE
    Lewin, JS
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 113 (02) : 499 - 507
  • [8] Chang DW, 2003, J RECONSTR MICROSURG, V19, P147
  • [9] CHENEY ML, 1993, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V119, P618
  • [10] Cheney ML, 1996, AM J OTOL, V17, P137