A life cycle assessment of the environmental impacts of cattle feedlot finishing rations

被引:3
作者
Werth, Samantha J. [1 ]
Rocha, Alice S. [1 ]
Oltjen, James W. [1 ]
Kebreab, Ermias [1 ]
Mitloehner, Frank M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Anim Sci, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
Beef; Emissions; Feed mill; Greenhouse gas; Livestock production; Total mixed ration; CARBON FOOTPRINT ANALYSIS; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; BEEF-PRODUCTION; BENEFITS; WATER;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-021-01957-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose A life cycle assessment was performed for the production of a total mixed ration (TMR) fed to finishing feedlot cattle in California, USA. The goal was to determine the climate change impact of the feed supply chain associated with the production of 1 kg finishing TMR (kg CO(2)e/kg TMR). A secondary goal was to compare the climate change impact of feed versus finished beef (kg CO(2)e/kg live weight). Methods The TMR was based on feeds commonly fed to finishing cattle in California. The Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance Partnership (LEAP) guidelines were followed for inventory data collection. System boundaries included the production of crops and feed additives, transportation of TMR components, and compound feed production. Data were sourced from national databases and Ecoinvent (TM) unit process data. Three scenarios were assessed as a result of allocation at the transportation step: Scenario A (100% empty return load); Scenario B (50% empty return load): and Scenario C (0% empty return load). Energy, mass, and economic allocation, and system expansion of dried distillers grain solubles (DDGS) were assessed for sensitivity analysis. Total feedlot emission data from Stackhouse-Lawson et al. (2012) were used to compare to impacts of TMR production. Results Total emissions were determined to be 0.630 kg CO(2)e/kg TMR for Scenario A, 0.576 kg CO(2)e/kg TMR for Scenario B, and 0.521 kg CO(2)e/kg TMR for Scenario C. Corn production, transportation, and liquid premix production were primary contributors to the life cycle impacts of TMR production. Mass-based allocation of DDGS was found to have the most significant effect on overall impacts of the finishing TMR, with a 42% increase in life cycle emissions compared to other allocation methods. For Scenario A, feed used in Angus feedlot production contributed to 76% of total Angus feedlot emissions. Additionally, feed used in Holstein feedlot production contributed to 58% of total Holstein feedlot emissions. Conclusions and recommendations The present study demonstrates a need to better assess the feed supply chain of feedlot beef production in order to accurately identify areas that have the most significant impacts on overall emissions. This may aid in minimizing impacts associated with feed production and, by extension, beef production. The present study may also serve to inform future decisions for improvements or alterations of the LEAP guidelines.
引用
收藏
页码:1779 / 1793
页数:15
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Carbon footprint analysis of dairy feed from a mill in Michigan, USA
    Adom, Felix
    Workman, Charles
    Thoma, Greg
    Shonnard, David
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL DAIRY JOURNAL, 2013, 31 : S21 - S28
  • [2] Regional carbon footprint analysis of dairy feeds for milk production in the USA
    Adom, Felix
    Maes, Ashley
    Workman, Charles
    Clayton-Nierderman, Zara
    Thoma, Greg
    Shonnard, David
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2012, 17 (05) : 520 - 534
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, SIMAPRO 7 1 LCA SOFT
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2001, DEV USE GREET 1 6 FU
  • [5] A life cycle assessment of the environmental impacts of a beef system in the USA
    Asem-Hiablie, Senorpe
    Battagliese, Thomas
    Stackhouse-Lawson, Kimberly R.
    Rotz, C. Alan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2019, 24 (03) : 441 - 455
  • [6] Battagliese T., 2013, More sustainable beef optimization project: Phase 1 final report
  • [7] Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from beef production in western Canada - Evaluation using farm-based life cycle assessment
    Beauchemin, K. A.
    Janzen, H. H.
    Little, S. M.
    McAllister, T. A.
    McGinn, S. M.
    [J]. ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 166-67 : 663 - 677
  • [8] Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from beef production in western Canada: A case study
    Beauchemin, Karen A.
    Janzen, H. Henry
    Little, Shannan M.
    McAllister, Tim A.
    McGinn, Sean M.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2010, 103 (06) : 371 - 379
  • [9] Quantification of GHG emissions from sucker-beef production in Ireland
    Casey, J. W.
    Holden, N. M.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2006, 90 (1-3) : 79 - 98
  • [10] Greenhouse gas emissions from conventional, agri-environmental scheme, and organic Irish suckler-beef units
    Casey, JW
    Holden, NM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2006, 35 (01) : 231 - 239