Examining the Reading Level of Internet Medical Information for Common Internal Medicine Diagnoses

被引:78
|
作者
Hutchinson, Nora [1 ]
Baird, Grayson L. [2 ]
Garg, Megha [3 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Dept Med, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[2] Rhode Isl Hosp, Lifespan Biostat Core, Providence, RI USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, San Francisco VA Med Ctr, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
Health literacy; Internal medicine; Online education; Patient health information; Readability;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.01.008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The National Institutes of Health (NIH) recommend that health materials be written at a grade 6-7 reading level, which has generally not been achieved in online reading materials. Up to the present time, there have not been any assessments focused on the reading level of online educational materials across the most popular consumer Web sites for common internal medicine diagnoses. In this study, we examined the readability of open-access online health information for 9 common internal medicine diagnoses. METHODS: Nine of the most frequently encountered inpatient and ambulatory internal medicine diagnoses were selected for analysis. In November and December 2014, these diagnoses were used as search terms in Google, and the top 5 Web sites across all diagnoses and a diagnosis-specific site were analyzed across 5 validated reading indices. RESULTS: On average, the lowest reading grade-level content was provided by the NIH (10.7), followed by WebMD (10.9), Mayo Clinic (11.3), and diagnosis-specific Web sites (11.5). Conversely, Wikipedia provided content that required the highest grade-level readability (14.6). The diagnoses with the lowest reading grade levels were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (10.8), followed by diabetes (10.9), congestive heart failure (11.7), osteoporosis (11.7) and hypertension (11.7). Depression had the highest grade-level readability (13.8). DISCUSSION: Despite recommendations for patient health information to be written at a grade 6-7 reading level, our examination of online educational materials pertaining to 9 common internal medicine diagnoses revealed reading levels significantly above the NIH recommendation. This was seen across both diagnosis-specific and general Web sites. There is a need to improve the readability of online educational materials made available to patients. These improvements have the potential to greatly enhance patient awareness, engagement, and physician-patient communication. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:637 / 639
页数:3
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] Common diagnoses in Internal Medicine in Europe 2009: A pan-European, Multi-Centre Survey
    Roger, Duckitt
    Runolfur, Palsson
    Lenka, Bosanska
    Lorenzo, Dagna
    Mine, Durusu Tanriover
    Moshe, Vardi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 21 (05) : 449 - 452
  • [2] A Delphi Study Among Internal Medicine Clinicians to Determine Which Therapeutic Information Is Essential to Record in a Medical Record
    van Unen, Robert J.
    Tichelaar, Jelle
    Nanayakkara, Prabath W. B.
    van Agtmael, Michiel A.
    Richir, Milan C.
    de Vries, Theo P. G. M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 55 (12) : 1415 - 1421
  • [3] What Every Internist-Endocrinologist Should Know about Rare Genetic Syndromes in Order to Prevent Needless Diagnostics, Missed Diagnoses and Medical Complications: Five Years of 'Internal Medicine for Rare Genetic Syndromes'
    Rosenberg, Anna G. W.
    Pater, Minke R. A.
    Pellikaan, Karlijn
    Davidse, Kirsten
    Kattentidt-Mouravieva, Anja A.
    Kersseboom, Rogier
    Bos-Roubos, Anja G.
    van Eeghen, Agnies
    Veen, Jose M. C.
    van der Meulen, Jiske J.
    Van Aalst-van Wieringen, Nina
    Hoekstra, Franciska M. E.
    van der Lely, Aart J.
    de Graaff, Laura C. G.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (22)