Effect of Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser vs Sham Treatment on Symptom Severity in Women With Postmenopausal Vaginal Symptoms A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:91
作者
Li, Fiona G. [1 ]
Maheux-Lacroix, Sarah [1 ]
Deans, Rebecca [1 ]
Nesbitt-Hawes, Erin [1 ]
Budden, Aaron [1 ]
Nguyen, Kimberly [1 ]
Lim, Claire Y. [1 ]
Song, Sophia [1 ]
McCormack, Lalla [1 ]
Lyons, Stephen D. [1 ]
Segelov, Eva [2 ]
Abbott, Jason A. [1 ]
机构
[1] UNSW Sydney, Sch Womens & Childrens Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Sch Clin Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2021年 / 326卷 / 14期
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
SEXUAL FUNCTION; CO2-LASER; ATROPHY;
D O I
10.1001/jama.2021.14892
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Question Is fractional carbon dioxide laser an effective treatment for vaginal symptoms associated with menopause? Findings This sham-controlled, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial included 90 women with postmenopausal vaginal symptoms. After 12 months, treatment with fractional carbon dioxide laser compared with sham treatment resulted in a change in visual analog scale score for overall symptom severity of -17.2 vs -26.6 (range, 0-100; lower scores indicate less symptom severity) and Vulvovaginal Symptom Questionnaire score of -3.1 vs -1.6 (range 0-20; lower scores indicate less symptoms). Neither comparison was statistically significant. Meaning Among women with postmenopausal vaginal symptoms, treatment with fractional carbon dioxide laser vs sham treatment did not improve vaginal symptoms after 12 months. This randomized clinical trial examines the efficacy of fractional carbon dioxide laser for the management of vaginal symptoms associated with menopause. Importance Postmenopausal vaginal symptoms are common and frequently detrimental to a woman's quality of life. Fractional carbon dioxide vaginal laser is increasingly offered as a treatment, but the efficacy remains unproven. Objective To determine the efficacy of fractional carbon dioxide laser for treatment of vaginal symptoms associated with menopause. Design, Setting, and Participants A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial with 12-month follow-up was undertaken at a single tertiary referral hospital in Sydney, Australia. Enrollment commenced on September 19, 2016, with final follow-up on June 30, 2020. Participants were postmenopausal women with vaginal symptoms substantive enough to seek medical treatment. Of 232 participants approached, 85 were randomized. Interventions Three treatments using a fractional microablative carbon dioxide laser system performed 4 to 8 weeks apart, with 43 women randomized to the laser group and 42 to the sham group. Main Outcomes and Measures The co-primary outcomes were symptom severity assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS; range, 0-100; 0 indicates no symptoms and 100 indicates the most severe symptoms) and the Vulvovaginal Symptom Questionnaire (VSQ; range, 0-20; 0 indicates no symptoms and 20 indicates the most severe symptoms) at 12 months. The minimal clinically important difference was specified as a 50% decrease in both VAS and VSQ severity scores. There were 5 prespecified secondary outcomes, including quality of life (range, 0-100; higher scores indicate better quality of life), the Vaginal Health Index Score (range, 5-25; higher scores indicate better health), and vaginal histology (premenopausal or postmenopausal status). Results Of 85 randomized participants (mean [SD] age, 57 [8] years), 78 (91.7%) completed the 12-month follow-up. From baseline to 12 months, there was no significant difference between the carbon dioxide laser group and the sham group in change in symptom severity (VAS score for overall vaginal symptoms: -17.2 vs -26.6; difference, 9.4 [95% CI, -28.6 to 47.5]; VAS score for the most severe symptom: -24.5 vs -20.4; difference -4.1 [95% CI, -32.5 to 24.3]; VSQ score: -3.1 vs -1.6; difference, -1.5 [95% CI, -5.9 to 3.0]). There were no significant differences between the laser and sham group in the mean quality of life score (6.3 vs 1.4; difference, 4.8 [95% CI, -3.9 to 13.5]) and Vaginal Health Index Score (0.9 vs 1.3; difference, -0.4 [95% CI, -4.3 to 3.6]) or in histological comparisons between laser and sham treatment groups. There were 16 adverse events in the laser group and 17 in the sham group, including vaginal pain/discomfort (44% vs 68%), spotting, discharge, and lower urinary tract symptoms. No severe adverse events were reported in either group. Conclusions and Relevance Among women with postmenopausal vaginal symptoms, treatment with fractional carbon dioxide laser vs sham treatment did not significantly improve vaginal symptoms after 12 months.
引用
收藏
页码:1381 / 1389
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Laparoscopic excision of endometriosis: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial [J].
Abbott, J ;
Hawe, J ;
Hunter, D ;
Holmes, M ;
Finn, P ;
Garry, R .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2004, 82 (04) :878-884
[2]   Laser Vaginal Tightening Complications: Report of Three Cases [J].
Al-Badr, Ahmed ;
Alkhamis, Waleed H. .
LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE, 2019, 51 (09) :757-759
[3]   Construct validity of the Assessment of Quality of Life - 6D (AQoL-6D) in community samples [J].
Allen, Joanne ;
Inder, Kerry J. ;
Lewin, Terry J. ;
Attia, John R. ;
Kelly, Brian J. .
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2013, 11
[4]   Urogenital ageing: An old problem newly recognized [J].
Bachmann, G .
MATURITAS, 1995, 22 :S1-S5
[5]   Can thermal lasers promote skin wound healing? [J].
Capon, A ;
Mordon, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DERMATOLOGY, 2003, 4 (01) :1-12
[6]   Evaluation of clinical meaningfulness of estrogen plus progesterone oral capsule (TX-001HR) on moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms [J].
Constantine, Ginger D. ;
Revicki, Dennis A. ;
Kagan, Risa ;
Simon, James A. ;
Graham, Shelli ;
Bernick, Brian ;
Mirkin, Sebastian .
MENOPAUSE-THE JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN MENOPAUSE SOCIETY, 2019, 26 (05) :513-519
[7]   Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial for evaluating the efficacy of fractional CO2 laser compared with topical estriol in the treatment of vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women [J].
Cruz, Vera L. ;
Steiner, Marcelo L. ;
Pompei, Luciano M. ;
Strufaldi, Rodolfo ;
Afonso Fonseca, Fernando L. ;
Simardi Santiago, Lucila H. ;
Wajsfeld, Tali ;
Fernandes, Cesar E. .
MENOPAUSE-THE JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN MENOPAUSE SOCIETY, 2018, 25 (01) :21-28
[8]   Assessing Sexual Function in Well Women: Validity and Reliability of the Monash Women's Health Program Female Sexual Satisfaction Questionnaire [J].
Davison, Sonia L. ;
Bell, Robin J. ;
La China, Maria ;
Holden, Samantha L. ;
Davis, Susan R. .
JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2008, 5 (11) :2575-2586
[9]  
Erekson EA, 2013, MENOPAUSE, V20, P973, DOI [10.1097/gme.0b013e318282600b, 10.1097/GME.0b013e318282600b]
[10]   Sexual function and sex hormones in breast cancer patients [J].
Gambardella, Antonio ;
Esposito, Daniela ;
Accardo, Giacomo ;
Taddeo, Marianna ;
Letizia, Antonietta ;
Tagliafierro, Rossella ;
Esposito, Katherine ;
Pasquali, Daniela .
ENDOCRINE, 2018, 60 (03) :510-515