Outcome Priorities for Older Persons With Sarcopenia

被引:16
作者
Hiligsmann, Mickael [1 ]
Beaudart, Charlotte [2 ,3 ]
Bruyere, Olivier [2 ,3 ]
Biver, Emmanuel [4 ,5 ]
Bauer, Juergen [6 ]
Cruz-Jentoft, Alfonso J. [7 ]
Gesmundo, Antonella [8 ]
Goisser, Sabine [6 ]
Landi, Francesco [9 ]
Locquet, Medea [2 ,3 ]
Maggi, Stefania [10 ]
Rizzoli, Rene [4 ,5 ]
Rolland, Yves [11 ]
Vaquero, Nieves [7 ]
Cooper, Cyrus [12 ,13 ]
Reginster, Jean-Yves [2 ,3 ,14 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, CAPHRI, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Liege, Dept Publ Hlth Epidemiol & Hlth Econ, Liege, Belgium
[3] WHO Collaborating Ctr Publ Hlth Aspects Musculosk, Liege, Belgium
[4] Univ Geneva, Geneva Univ Hosp, Serv Bone Dis, Geneva, Switzerland
[5] Univ Geneva, Fac Med, Geneva, Switzerland
[6] Heidelberg Univ, Ctr Geriatr Med & Network Aging Res NAR, Heidelberg, Germany
[7] Hosp Univ Ramon y Cajal IRYCIS, Serv Geriatria, Madrid, Spain
[8] Rehabil Hosp, Dept Med, Motta Di Livenza, TV, Italy
[9] Catholic Univ Sacred Heart Rome, Dept Geriatr Neurosci & Orthoped, Milan, Italy
[10] CNR, Neurosci Inst, Aging Branch, Padua, Italy
[11] Univ Toulouse III, CHU Purpan, Gerontopole Toulouse, INSERM 1027, Toulouse, France
[12] Univ Southampton, MRC Lifecourse Epidemiol Unit, Southampton, Hants, England
[13] Univ Oxford, NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomed Res Unit, Oxford, England
[14] King Saud Univ, Coll Sci, Biochem Dept, KSA Chair Biomarkers Chron Dis, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Discrete-choice experiment; sarcopenia; outcomes; patient preferences; DISCRETE-CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; HEALTH; QUALITY; BURDEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jamda.2019.08.026
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate patients' preferences for sarcopenia outcomes. Design: Discrete-choice experiment (DCE) Setting and Participants: Community-dwelling individuals older than 65 years suffering from sarcopenia recruited in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and Switzerland, who visited the clinic and were cognitively able to understand and fill out the survey. Methods: In the DCE survey, participants were repetitively asked to choose which one of the 2 patients suffering from sarcopenia deserves treatment the most. The 2 patients presented different levels of risk for 5 preselected sarcopenia outcomes: quality of life, mobility, domestic activities, fatigue, and falls. The DCE included 12 choice sets. Mixed logit panel model was used to estimate patients preferences and latent class model was conducted to identify profiles of responses. Results: A total of 216 sarcopenic persons were included for the analysis (68% women; mean age 78 years). All 5 preselected sarcopenia outcomes were shown to be significant. Overall, the most important sarcopenia outcome was mobility (30%), followed by the ability to manage domestic activities (22%), the risk of falls (18%), fatigue (17%), and quality of life (14%). The latent class model identified 2 classes of respondents. In the first class (probability of 56%), participants valued mobility the most (42%), followed by the ability to manage domestic activities (23%) and risk of falls (17%). In the second class, fatigue was the most important outcome (27%) followed by domestic activities (19%) and risk of falls (19%). No statistically significant associations between the latent classes and sociodemographic characteristics were found. Conclusions and Implications: This study suggests that all 5 preselected outcomes were important for sarcopenic older individuals. Overall, the most important outcomes were mobility and the ability to manage domestic activities, although variations in preferences were observed between respondents. This could help in incorporating patient preferences when designing appropriate solutions for individuals with sarcopenia. (C) 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:267 / +
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Beaudart C, J AM MED DIR ASSOC
  • [2] Health Outcomes of Sarcopenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Beaudart, Charlotte
    Zaaria, Myriam
    Pasleau, Francoise
    Reginster, Jean-Yves
    Bruyere, Olivier
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (01):
  • [3] Development of a self-administrated quality of life questionnaire for sarcopenia in elderly subjects: the SarQoL
    Beaudart, Charlotte
    Biver, Emmanuel
    Reginster, Jean-Yves
    Rizzoli, Rene
    Rolland, Yves
    Bautmans, Ivan
    Petermans, Jean
    Gillain, Sophie
    Buckinx, Fanny
    Van Beveren, Julien
    Jacquemain, Marc
    Italiano, Patrick
    Dardenne, Nadia
    Bruyere, Olivier
    [J]. AGE AND AGEING, 2015, 44 (06) : 960 - 966
  • [4] Beaudart C, 2014, ARCH PUBLIC HEALTH, V72, DOI 10.1186/2049-3258-72-45
  • [5] Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health-a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force
    Bridges, John F. P.
    Hauber, A. Brett
    Marshall, Deborah
    Lloyd, Andrew
    Prosser, Lisa A.
    Regier, Dean A.
    Johnson, F. Reed
    Mauskopf, Josephine
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (04) : 403 - 413
  • [6] The health economics burden of sarcopenia: a systematic review
    Bruyere, Olivier
    Beaudart, Charlotte
    Ethgen, Olivier
    Reginster, Jean-Yves
    Locquet, Medea
    [J]. MATURITAS, 2019, 119 : 61 - 69
  • [7] Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis
    Cruz-Jentoft, Alfonso J.
    Bahat, Gulistan
    Bauer, Juergen
    Boirie, Yves
    Bruyere, Olivier
    Cederholm, Tommy
    Cooper, Cyrus
    Landi, Francesco
    Rolland, Yves
    Sayer, Avan Aihie
    Schneider, Stephane M.
    Sieber, Cornel C.
    Topinkova, Eva
    Vandewoude, Maurits
    Visser, Marjolein
    Zamboni, Mauro
    [J]. AGE AND AGEING, 2019, 48 (01) : 16 - 31
  • [8] Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis
    Cruz-Jentoft, Alfonso J.
    Baeyens, Jean Pierre
    Bauer, Juergen M.
    Boirie, Yves
    Cederholm, Tommy
    Landi, Francesco
    Martin, Finbarr C.
    Michel, Jean-Pierre
    Rolland, Yves
    Schneider, Stephane M.
    Topinkova, Eva
    Vandewoude, Maurits
    Zamboni, Mauro
    [J]. AGE AND AGEING, 2010, 39 (04) : 412 - 423
  • [9] Sample Size Requirements for Discrete-Choice Experiments in Healthcare: a Practical Guide
    de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
    Donkers, Bas
    Jonker, Marcel F.
    Stolk, Elly A.
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2015, 8 (05) : 373 - 384
  • [10] Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force
    Hauber, A. Brett
    Gonzalez, Juan Marcos
    Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Catharina G. M.
    Prior, Thomas
    Marshall, Deborah A.
    Cunningham, Charles
    Ijzerman, Maarten J.
    Bridges, John F. P.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (04) : 300 - 315