Decision making for sustainable urban energy planning: an integrated I it evaluation framework of alternative solutions for a NZED (Net Zero-Energy District) in Turin

被引:63
作者
Becchio, Cristina [1 ]
Bottero, Marta Carla [2 ]
Corgnati, Stefano Paolo [1 ]
Dell'Anna, Federico [2 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Torino, Dept Energy, Corso Duca Abruzzi 24, I-10129 Turin, Italy
[2] Politecn Torino, Dept Reg & Urban Studies & Planning, Viale Mattioli 39, I-10125 Turin, Italy
关键词
Net Zero-Energy District; Co-benefit; Energy refurbishment; Cost-benefit analysis; Socio-economic impact; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS; RATING SYSTEMS LEED; MULTICRITERIA EVALUATION; RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS; STAKEHOLDERS ANALYSIS; EFFICIENCY MEASURES; IMPACT; CHINA; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.048
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The European Union issued several directives in the field of energy efficiency which impact on the building sector in order to avoid a further increase of energy consumption and to mitigate climate change. In particular, the recast of the European Energy Performance of Buildings supports the improvement of buildings energy performance and introduces a new target, the Nearly Zero-Energy Building (NZEB) concept. Nowadays, the European Commission is shifting attention towards the district level and post-carbon cities and Net Zero-Energy District (NZED) targets are emerging. In order to evaluate alternative strategies for the construction of NZED, according to a socio-economic point of view, different aspects and impacts have to be considered. This paper studies the NZED concept and proposes an evaluation method developed from the Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) in order to include extra-economic benefits generated by the project. The proposed approach is applied on a real case concerning the energy requalification of a NZED in Turin (Italy).
引用
收藏
页码:803 / 817
页数:15
相关论文
共 136 条
  • [41] [Anonymous], 2012, GUIDELINES CONDUCTIN
  • [42] [Anonymous], NEW METROPOLITAN PER
  • [43] [Anonymous], 59CS14 ISOTC
  • [44] [Anonymous], SOCIAL HOUSING MODEL
  • [45] [Anonymous], IT NAT EN STRAT MOR
  • [46] [Anonymous], 2007, 15459 EN
  • [47] [Anonymous], 1982, LAIDE DECISION NATUR
  • [48] [Anonymous], 2011, UNDERSTANDING COSTS
  • [49] Cost-benefit analysis method for building solutions
    Araujo, Catarina
    Almeida, Manuela
    Braganca, Luis
    Barbosa, Jose Amarilio
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 173 : 124 - 133
  • [50] A comparison between environmental sustainability rating systems LEED and ITACA for residential buildings
    Asdrubali, F.
    Baldinelli, G.
    Bianchi, F.
    Sambuco, S.
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 86 : 98 - 108