Physical Activity Questionnaires for Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties

被引:50
|
作者
Sattler, Matteo C. [1 ]
Jaunig, Johannes [1 ]
Watson, Estelle D. [2 ,3 ]
van Poppel, Mireille N. M. [1 ,4 ]
Mokkink, Lidwine B. [5 ]
Terwee, Caroline B. [5 ]
Dietz, Pavel [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Inst Sport Sci, Graz, Austria
[2] Univ Witwatersrand, Ctr Exercise Sci & Sports Med, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Therapeut Sci, Private Bag 3, ZA-2050 Johannesburg, South Africa
[3] Univ Witwatersrand, MRC Wits Dev Pathways Hlth Res Unit, Dept Paediat, Fac Hlth Sci,Sch Clin Med, Private Bag 3, ZA-2050 Johannesburg, South Africa
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Publ & Occupat Hlth, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Inst Occupat Social & Environm Med, Univ Med Ctr, Mainz, Germany
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ENERGY-EXPENDITURE; WEIGHT-GAIN; CUT-POINTS; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; ACCELEROMETER; HEALTH; VALIDATION; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s40279-018-0961-x
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
BackgroundIn order toassess physical activity (PA) during pregnancy, it is important to choose the instrument with the best measurement properties.ObjectivesTo systematically summarize, appraise, and compare the measurement properties of all self-administered questionnaires assessing PA in pregnancy.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, and SPORTDiscus with the following inclusion criteria: (i) the study reported at least one measurement property (reliability, criterion validity,construct validity, responsiveness) of a self-administered questionnaire; (ii) the questionnaire intended to measure PA; (iii) the questionnaire was evaluated in healthy pregnant women; and (iv) the study was published in English. We evaluated results, quality of individual studies, and quality of evidence using a standardized checklist (Quality Assessment of Physical Activity Questionnaires [QAPAQ]) and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.ResultsSeventeen articles, reporting 18 studies of 11 different PA questionnaires (17 versions), were included. Most questionnaire versions showed insufficient measurement properties. Only the French and Turkish versions of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) showed both sufficient reliability and construct validity. However, all versions of the PPAQ pooled together showed insufficient construct validity. The quality of individual studies was usually high for reliability but varied considerably for construct validity. Overall, the quality of evidence was very low to moderate.ConclusionsWe recommend the PPAQ to assess PA in pregnancy, although the pooled results revealed insufficient construct validity. The lack of appropriate standards in data collection and processing criteria for objective devices in measuring PA during pregnancy attenuates the quality of evidence. Therefore, research on the validity of comparison instruments in pregnancy followed by consensus on validation reference criteria and standards of PA measurement is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:2317 / 2346
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires
    Helmerhorst, Hendrik J. F.
    Brage, Soren
    Warren, Janet
    Besson, Herve
    Ekelund, Ulf
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2012, 9
  • [22] Patient-reported physical activity questionnaires: A systematic review of content and format
    Williams, Kate
    Frei, Anja
    Vetsch, Anders
    Dobbels, Fabienne
    Puhan, Milo A.
    Ruedell, Katja
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2012, 10
  • [23] MEASURING PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IN PREGNANCY USING QUESTIONNAIRES: A META-ANALYSIS
    Schuster, Snjezana
    Sklempe Kokic, Iva
    Sindik, Josko
    ACTA CLINICA CROATICA, 2016, 55 (03) : 440 - 452
  • [24] Comparison of psychometric properties between recall methods of interview-based physical activity questionnaires: a systematic review
    Kenji Doma
    Renée Speyer
    Lauren Alese Parsons
    Reinie Cordier
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19
  • [25] Critical evaluation of physical activity questionnaires translated to Brazilian-Portuguese: a systematic review on cross-cultural adaptation and measurements properties
    Silva, Fernanda Goncalves
    Oliveira, Crystian Bitencourt
    Hisamatsu, Thalysi Mayumi
    Negrao Filho, Ruben Faria
    Dutra Rodrigues, Caio Russo
    Franco, Marcia Rodrigues
    Pinto, Rafael Zambelli
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2020, 24 (03) : 187 - 218
  • [26] Review Article: A Systematic Review of Cancer-Related Fatigue Measurement Questionnaires
    Seyidova-Khoshknabi, Dilara
    Davis, Mellar P.
    Walsh, Declan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2011, 28 (02) : 119 - 129
  • [27] Measurement properties of questionnaires assessing participation in children and adolescents with a disability: a systematic review
    Rainey, Linda
    van Nispen, Ruth
    van der Zee, Carlijn
    van Rens, Ger
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2014, 23 (10) : 2793 - 2808
  • [28] A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Leicester Cough Questionnaires based on the COSMIN guidelines
    Bottine, Anne
    Grandjean, Julien
    Standaert, Marie
    Abdellaoui, Aldjia
    Reychler, Gregory
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2024, 231
  • [29] Outcome measurement instruments for peripheral vascular malformations and an assessment of the measurement properties: a systematic review
    Horbach, Sophie E. R.
    Rongen, Amber P. M.
    Elbers, Roy G.
    van der Horst, Chantal M. A. M.
    Prinsen, Cecilia A. C.
    Spuls, Phyllis, I
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [30] Systematic review of measurement properties of questionnaires measuring somatization in primary care patients
    Sitnikova, Kate
    Dijkstra-Kersten, Sandra M. A.
    Mokkink, Lidwine B.
    Terluin, Berend
    van Marwijk, Harm W. J.
    Leone, Stephanie S.
    van der Horst, Henriette E.
    van der Wouden, Johannes C.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2017, 103 : 42 - 62