Latent inhibition in the honey bee, Apis mellifera: Is it a unitary phenomenon?

被引:42
作者
Chandra, Sathees B. C. [2 ]
Wright, Geraldine A. [3 ]
Smith, Brian H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Sch Life Sci, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Roosevelt Univ, Dept Biol Chem & Phys Sci, Chicago, IL 60605 USA
[3] Univ Newcastle, Inst Neurosci, Ctr Behav & Evolut, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
Latent inhibition; Honey bee; Context; Olfaction; Mechanism; LEARNING-PERFORMANCE; HERITABLE VARIATION; ODORANT MIXTURES; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; PREEXPOSURE; EXPOSURE; CONTEXT; CS; DISCRIMINATION; REINFORCEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s10071-010-0329-6
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Latent inhibition refers to learning that some stimuli are not signals of important events. It has been widely studied in vertebrates, but it has been substantially less well studied in invertebrates. We present an investigation into latent inhibition in the honey bee (Apis mellifera) using a proboscis extension response conditioning procedure that involved 'preexposure' of an odor without reinforcement prior to appetitive conditioning. A significant latent inhibition effect, measured in terms of a reduction in acquisition performance to the preexposed odor, was observed after 8 unreinforced presentations, and the effect continued to increase in strength up to 30 presentations. We also observed that memories formed for the preexposed odor lasted at least 24 h. Further manipulation of interstimulus interval and the visual conditioning context partially attenuated the effect. The latter results indicate that latent inhibition in honey bees may not be a unitary phenomenon. Two different mechanisms may be required, in which one mechanism is dependent on the visual context and the second is not.
引用
收藏
页码:805 / 815
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] LATENT INHIBITION IN HONEYBEES
    ABRAMSON, CI
    BITTERMAN, ME
    [J]. ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 1986, 14 (02): : 184 - 189
  • [2] Agresti A., 2019, An introduction to categorical data analysis, V3rd
  • [3] INTERVAL BETWEEN PREEXPOSURE AND TEST DETERMINES THE MAGNITUDE OF LATENT INHIBITION - IMPLICATIONS FOR AN INTERFERENCE ACCOUNT
    AGUADO, L
    SYMONDS, M
    HALL, G
    [J]. ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 1994, 22 (02): : 188 - 194
  • [4] TOPOGRAPHY OF SEXUALLY CONDITIONED BEHAVIOR IN MALE JAPANESE-QUAIL (COTURNIX-JAPONICA) DEPENDS ON THE CS-US INTERVAL
    AKINS, CK
    DOMJAN, M
    GUTIERREZ, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL BEHAVIOR PROCESSES, 1994, 20 (02): : 199 - 209
  • [5] Dose-dependent nonassociative olfactory learning in a fly
    Barbarossa, Iole Tomassini
    Muroni, Patrizia
    Setzu, Maria D.
    Angioy, Anna Maria
    [J]. CHEMICAL SENSES, 2007, 32 (06) : 535 - 541
  • [6] Beck CDO, 2000, J NEUROSCI, V20, P2944
  • [7] ROLE OF SHORT-TERM PROCESSES IN CONDITIONED STIMULUS PREEXPOSURE EFFECT AND DELAY OF REINFORCEMENT GRADIENT IN LONG-DELAY TASTE-AVERSION LEARNING
    BEST, MR
    GEMBERLING, GA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL BEHAVIOR PROCESSES, 1977, 3 (03): : 253 - 263
  • [8] CLASSICAL-CONDITIONING OF PROBOSCIS EXTENSION IN HONEYBEES (APIS-MELLIFERA)
    BITTERMAN, ME
    MENZEL, R
    FIETZ, A
    SCHAFER, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 97 (02) : 107 - 119
  • [9] Boughner RL, 2003, LEARN BEHAV, V31, P387
  • [10] Heritable variation for latent inhibition and its correlation with reversal learning in honeybees (Apis mellifera)
    Chandra, SBC
    Hosler, JS
    Smith, BH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 114 (01) : 86 - 97