Height Contributes to the Gender Difference in Wait-List Mortality Under the MELD-Based Liver Allocation System

被引:107
作者
Lai, J. C. [1 ]
Terrault, N. A. [1 ]
Vittinghoff, E. [2 ]
Biggins, S. W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Div Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Denver, CO 80202 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
Female; gender disparities; liver transplantation; MELD score; organ allocation; wait-list mortality; TRANSPLANTATION; MODEL; SURVIVAL; DISPARITIES; CREATININE; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03326.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
This study examined factors associated with the gender disparity in wait-list mortality in the MELD era. Adult patients listed for liver transplantation from 2002 to 2008 were included. Females [12 585(36%)] and males [22 126(64%)] differed clinically by age (54 vs. 52 years), height (1.6 vs. 1.8 m), listing estimated glomerular filtration rate [(eGFR); 70 vs. 83 mL/min] and cirrhosis etiology. Holding MELD constant, females were at 19% (95% CI, 1.13-1.25, p < 0.001) higher risk of wait-list mortality than males under the current allocation system. The relative hazard increased with worsening renal function, whether measured by serum creatinine or eGFR. Adjustment for MELD, age, African-American race, cirrhosis etiology, region and ABO group attenuated this relative hazard (HR 1.16; 95% CI, 1.10-1.22; p < 0.001) but additional adjustment for height completely explained this gender disparity in wait-list mortality (HR 1.05; 95% CI, 0.98-1.12; p = 0.2). Transplantation rates, however, remained lower among females, even after adjustment for height (HR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.82-0.92; p < 0.001). In conclusion, under the current liver allocation system, women have a 19% increased risk of wait-list mortality compared to men with the same MELD scores. Height contributes to this gender disparity, possibly reflecting differences in transplantation rates for shorter individuals.
引用
收藏
页码:2658 / 2664
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Race and Sex Disparities in Liver Transplantation Progress Toward Achieving Equal Access? [J].
Axelrod, David A. ;
Pomfret, Elizabeth A. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 300 (20) :2425-2426
[2]  
Chatterjee S., 2006, Regression Analysis by Example, V4th
[3]   Female liver transplant recipients with the same GFR as male recipients have lower MELD scores - A systematic bias [J].
Cholongitas, E. ;
Marelli, L. ;
Kerry, A. ;
Goodier, D. W. ;
Nair, D. ;
Thomas, M. ;
Patch, D. ;
Burroughs, A. K. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 7 (03) :685-692
[4]  
Dureja Parul, 2009, Hepatology, V50, P981, DOI 10.1002/hep.22939
[5]   A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk [J].
Fine, JP ;
Gray, RJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 94 (446) :496-509
[6]   Liver and intestine transplantation in the United States, 1997-2006 [J].
Freeman, R. B., Jr. ;
Steffick, D. E. ;
Guidinger, M. K. ;
Farmer, D. G. ;
Berg, C. L. ;
Merion, R. M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 8 (04) :958-976
[7]   Results of the first year of the new liver allocation plan [J].
Freeman, RB ;
Wiesner, RH ;
Edwards, E ;
Harper, A ;
Merion, R ;
Wolfe, R .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 10 (01) :7-15
[8]   The new liver allocation system: Moving toward evidence-based transplantation policy [J].
Freeman, RB ;
Wiesner, RH ;
Harper, A ;
McDiarmid, SV ;
Lake, J ;
Edwards, E ;
Merion, R ;
Wolfe, R ;
Turcotte, J ;
Teperman, L .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 8 (09) :851-858
[9]  
Harrell FE., 2001, Regression Modeling Strategies: with Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis, V608, DOI DOI 10.2147/
[10]   Is the corrected-creatinine Model for End-stage Liver Disease a feasible strategy to adjust gender difference in organ allocation for liver transplantation? [J].
Huo, Samantha C. ;
Huo, Teh-Ia ;
Lin, Han-Chieh ;
Chi, Chin-Wen ;
Lee, Pui-Ching ;
Tseng, Fan-Wei ;
Lee, Shou-Dong .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 84 (11) :1406-1412