Dynamic pricing strategies with reference effects

被引:311
作者
Popescu, Ioana
Wu, Yaozhong
机构
[1] INSEAD, Decis Sci Area, F-77300 Fontainebleau, France
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, NUS Business Sch, Dept Decis Sci, Singapore 117592, Singapore
关键词
D O I
10.1287/opre.1070.0393
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We consider the dynamic pricing problem of a monopolist firm in a market with repeated interactions, where demand is sensitive to the firm's pricing history. Consumers have memory and are prone to human decision-making biases and cognitive limitations. As the firm manipulates prices, consumers form a reference price that adjusts as an anchoring standard based on price perceptions. Purchase decisions are made by assessing prices as discounts or surcharges relative to the reference price in the spirit of prospect theory. We prove that optimal pricing policies induce a perception of monotonic prices, whereby consumers always perceive a discount, respectively surcharge, relative to their expectations. The effect is that of a skimming or penetration strategy. The firm's optimal pricing path is monotonic on the long run, but not necessarily at the introductory stage. If consumers are loss averse, we show that optimal prices converge to a constant steady-state price, characterized by a simple implicit equation; otherwise, the optimal policy cycles. The range of steady states is wider the more loss averse consumers are. Steady-state prices decrease with the strength of the reference effect and with customers' memory, all else equal. Offering lower prices to frequent customers may be suboptimal, however, if these are less sensitive to price changes than occasional buyers. If managers ignore such long-term implications of their pricing strategy, the model indicates that they will systematically price too low and lose revenue. Our results hold under very general reference dependent demand models.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 429
页数:17
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Anderson C. K., 2005, International Transactions in Operational Research, V12, P509, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-3995.2005.00522.x
[2]   THE ONCE BUT NOT TWICE DIFFERENTIABILITY OF THE POLICY FUNCTION [J].
ARAUJO, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1991, 59 (05) :1383-1393
[3]  
Bitran G., 2003, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, V5, P203, DOI 10.1287/msom.5.3.203.16031
[4]   A comparative analysis of reference price models [J].
Briesch, RA ;
Krishnamurthi, L ;
Mazumdar, T ;
Raj, SP .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1997, 24 (02) :202-214
[5]   Dynamic pricing in the presence of inventory considerations: Research overview, current practices, and future directions [J].
Elmaghraby, W ;
Keskinocak, P .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2003, 49 (10) :1287-1309
[6]   Explicit solutions of optimization models and differential games with nonsmooth (asymmetric) reference-price effects [J].
Fibich, G ;
Gavious, A ;
Lowengart, O .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2003, 51 (05) :721-734
[7]   THE IMPACT OF REFERENCE PRICE EFFECTS ON THE PROFITABILITY OF PRICE PROMOTIONS [J].
GREENLEAF, EA .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1995, 14 (01) :82-104
[8]  
HEIDHUES P, 2005, IMPACT CONSUMER LOSS
[9]  
HELSON M, 1964, ADAPTATION LEVEL THE
[10]   PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) :263-291