Professionals' perceptions of their patients' experiences with fertility care

被引:34
作者
Aarts, J. W. M. [1 ]
Faber, M. J. [2 ]
van Empel, I. W. H. [1 ]
Scheenjes, E. [3 ]
Nelen, W. L. D. M. [1 ]
Kremer, J. A. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Med Ctr, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Sci Inst Qual Healthcare, Med Ctr, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Gelderse Vallei Ziekenhuis, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, NL-6710 HN Ede, Netherlands
关键词
patient-centredness; infertility; quality of care; survey; GENERAL-PRACTICE; STAFF PERCEPTION; QUALITY; SATISFACTION; INFERTILITY; FEEDBACK; IMPACT; PRACTITIONERS; PERFORMANCE; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/der054
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Patient-centredness is one of the core dimensions of quality of care. It can be monitored with surveys measuring patients' experiences with care. The objective of the present study was to determine to what extent gynaecologists, physicians specializing in infertility and nurses can estimate the level of patient-centredness of their clinic. METHODS: A random sample of 1189 couples with fertility problems and 194 physicians and nurses from 29 Dutch fertility clinics participated in this cross-sectional study. Differences between patients' experiences with fertility care and professionals' perceptions of these experiences as measured with the patient-centredness questionnaire-infertility (PCQ-infertility) were calculated. The questionnaire's structure, comprising one total scale (level 1), seven subscales (level 2) and 46 single items (level 3), was used as a framework. RESULTS: Response rates were 75% (n = 888) in the patient sample and 83% (n = 160) in the professional sample. Independent sample t-tests, corrected for multiple comparisons with the Bonferroni correction method (P < 0.05), showed no significant differences in mean scores on the total scale of patient-centredness for either professionals or patients. At level 2, professionals underestimated most subscales, namely, 'Accessibility', 'Communication', 'Patient involvement' and 'Competence', whereas 'Continuity of care' was overestimated. Professionals significantly and clinically relevantly misjudged 29 care aspects. CONCLUSIONS: Professionals within fertility care cannot adequately evaluate their performance regarding patient-centredness, and specifically the care aspects to which their own patients attribute the greatest improvement potential. Providing detailed feedback might start improvement of patient-centredness and quality of care.
引用
收藏
页码:1119 / 1127
页数:9
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Assisted reproductive technology and intrauterine inseminations in Europe, 2005: results generated from European registers by ESHRE [J].
Andersen, A. Nyboe ;
Goossens, V. ;
Bhattacharya, S. ;
Ferraretti, A. P. ;
Kupka, M. S. ;
de Mouzon, J. ;
Nygren, K. G. .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2009, 24 (06) :1267-1287
[2]   Staff perception of the impact of health care transformation on quality of care [J].
Arnetz, BB .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1999, 11 (04) :345-351
[3]   Measure, learn, and improve: Physicians' involvement in quality improvement [J].
Audet, AMJ ;
Doty, MM ;
Shamasdin, J ;
Schoenbaum, SC .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2005, 24 (03) :843-853
[4]   A user's manual for the IOM's 'quality chasm' report [J].
Berwick, DM .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2002, 21 (03) :80-90
[5]   What 'Patient-Centered' Should Mean: Confessions Of An Extremist [J].
Berwick, Donald M. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2009, 28 (04) :W555-W565
[6]  
Bisognano M, 2010, HLTH EXPECT, V25, P86
[7]  
Bisognano Maureen, 2010, Healthc Exec, V25, P86
[8]   Measuring patients' experiences and outcomes [J].
Black, Nick ;
Jenkinson, Crispin .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 339 :b2495
[10]   How a well-grounded minimal important difference can enhance transparency of labelling claims and improve interpretation of a patient reported outcome measure [J].
Brozek, Jan L. ;
Guyatt, Gordon H. ;
Schuenemann, Holger J. .
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2006, 4 (1)