Validation of a feature-based likelihood ratio method for the SAILR software. Part I: Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry data for comparison of diesel oil samples

被引:3
作者
Malmborg, Jonas [1 ]
Nordgaard, Anders [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Forens Ctr, SE-58194 Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Linkoping Univ, Dept Comp & Informat Sci, SE-58183 Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
Likelihood ratio; Validation; Strength of evidence; Gas chromatography; Oil fingerprinting;
D O I
10.1016/j.forc.2021.100375
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Statistical modelling of probability distributions from background data to arrive at a likelihood ratio (LR) is becoming more common in the forensic community. An open-source software called SAILR was recently launched by a European Union-funded project to provide forensic practitioners with a mathematical backbone in a user-friendly graphical interface. Before presenting values produced by the software as evidence in court, the LR method must be validated. In this study, a multivariate feature-based LR method for SAILR was validated using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry data from comparison of diesel oil samples. The validation strategy relied on use of specific performance characteristics (e.g., accuracy, discrimination, and calibration) and their corresponding metrics (e.g., cost of log-likelihood ratio and equal error rate). The validation also encompassed the normality assumption for within-source variation. Any deviation from the normality assumption was mitigated using Lambert W transformation of the data, which improved model performance. The LR method chosen for validation was optimized using background data, and a baseline method was simultaneously developed to provide the validation criteria. The results showed that the available data could support a trivariate (or lower) model. The LR method chosen for validation outperformed the baseline method according to the performance characteristics. Using the empirical lower and upper boundaries LR method, the output limits were determined to be 1/537 < LR < 1412. By passing the tests of normality and the validation criteria, the method was considered valid within this LR range for data of sufficient quality, and relevant to the background data set.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Evaluation of trace evidence in the form of multivariate data [J].
Aitken, CGG ;
Lucy, D .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 2004, 53 :109-122
[2]   Evidence evaluation for discrete data [J].
Aitken, Colin ;
Gold, Erica .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 230 (1-3) :147-155
[3]   A two-level model for evidence evaluation [J].
Aitken, Colin G. G. ;
Zadora, Grzegorz ;
Lucy, David .
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2007, 52 (02) :412-419
[4]   Bayesian Hierarchical Random Effects Models in Forensic Science [J].
Aitken, Colin G. G. .
FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2018, 9
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ARXIV13042331
[6]  
CEN, 2012, 155222 CENTR
[7]   On the existence of a normal approximation to the distribution of the ratio of two independent normal random variables [J].
Diaz-Frances, Eloisa ;
Rubio, Francisco J. .
STATISTICAL PAPERS, 2013, 54 (02) :309-323
[8]  
Goerg G. M., 2020, LAMBERTW R PACKAGE L
[9]  
Goerg Georg M, 2015, ScientificWorldJournal, V2015, P909231, DOI 10.1155/2015/909231
[10]  
Kohavi R, 1995, P 14 INT JOINT C ART, V14, P1137, DOI [10.1007/s007730200012, DOI 10.5555/1643031.1643047]