Feasibility Study of Switching to Nilotinib After First-line Imatinib in the Chronic Phase of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

被引:3
作者
Chen, Yilin [1 ]
Yin, Hua [1 ]
Chen, Lifeng [1 ]
Xiong, Yingyuan [1 ]
Meng, Li [2 ]
Guo, Jingming [3 ,4 ]
Wang, Haiyan [3 ,4 ]
Li, Weiming [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Union Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan 430022, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[3] Three Gorges Univ, Yichang Cent Peoples Hosp, Yichang 443000, Hubei, Peoples R China
[4] Three Gorges Univ, Clin Med Coll China 1, Yichang 443000, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
Chronic phase; CML; First-line; Imatinib; Nilotinib; TYROSINE KINASE INHIBITOR; SUBOPTIMAL RESPONSE; ACCELERATED PHASE; FOLLOW-UP; FAILURE; CML; RESISTANT; EFFICACY; CHINESE; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.clml.2019.12.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
First-line imatinib can achieve efficacy similar to that with first-line nilotinib after standardized management in accordance with the European Leukemia Network recommendations. Treatment with imatinib as first-line treatment, with a switch to nilotinib after standardized management is feasible and effective. Both nilotinib and imatinib have been shown to be well tolerated and safe. Background: We investigated the real-life choice of first-line treatment in the chronic phase of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) and the feasibility of switching to nilotinib after first-line imatinib. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the efficacy and safety of imatinib versus nilotinib as first-line therapy for patients with CML-CP. We also performed a comparative analysis of the efficacy of sustained imatinib versus a switch to nilotinib for patients with CML-CP with a warning or failure response or intolerance to imatinib. We also comparatively analyzed the efficacy between first-line nilotinib and first-line imatinib after standardized management in accordance with the European Leukemia Network (ELN) recommendations. A total of 344 patients were included in the present study. Results: The proportion of patients achieving a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), major molecular response (MMR), and molecular response 4.0 (MR4.0) was greater with first-line nilotinib than with first-line imatinib at 0 to 24 and 0 to 36 months (P < .05). Of the 344 patients, 174 did not achieve an optimal response to first-line imatinib. A greater proportion of those patients who had switch to nilotinib had achieved a CCyR, MMR, and MR4.0 compared with those continuing imatinib for 12 months of subsequent treatment (P < .005). No difference was found in the proportion of patients with a CCyR, MMR, and MR4.0 between first-line nilotinib and first-line imatinib after standardized management in accordance with the ELN recommendations at 0 to 24 and 0 to 36 months (P > .05). Conclusion: First-line imatinib can result in efficacy similar to that with first-line nilotinib after standardized management in accordance with the ELN recommendations. Treatment with imatinib as first-line treatment, with a switch to nilotinib after standardized management is feasible and effective. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E43 / E49
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nilotinib is superior to imatinib as first-line therapy of chronic myeloid leukemia: the ENESTnd study
    Giles, Francis J.
    Rosti, Gianantonio
    Beris, Photis
    Clark, Richard E.
    le Coutre, Philipp
    Mahon, Francois-Xavier
    Steegmann, Juan-Luis
    Valent, Peter
    Saglio, Giuseppe
    EXPERT REVIEW OF HEMATOLOGY, 2010, 3 (06) : 665 - 673
  • [2] First-line treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia: dasatinib, nilotinib, or imatinib
    Wei, Guoqing
    Rafiyath, Shamudheen
    Liu, Delong
    JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY & ONCOLOGY, 2010, 3
  • [3] First-line treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia: dasatinib, nilotinib, or imatinib
    Guoqing Wei
    Shamudheen Rafiyath
    Delong Liu
    Journal of Hematology & Oncology, 3
  • [4] Nilotinib as first-line therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia
    Vaid, A.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 48 (04) : 438 - 445
  • [5] An indirect comparison between bosutinib, nilotinib and dasatinib in first-line chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia
    Muresan, Bogdan
    Mamolo, Carla
    Cappelleri, Joseph C.
    Leip, Eric
    Viqueira, Andrea
    Heeg, Bart
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2021, 37 (05) : 801 - 809
  • [6] Exploratory study on the impact of switching to nilotinib in 18 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase with suboptimal response to imatinib
    Ailawadhi, Sikander
    Akard, Luke P.
    Miller, Carole B.
    Jillella, Anand
    DeAngelo, Daniel J.
    Ericson, Solveig G.
    Lin, Felice
    Warsi, Ghulam
    Radich, Jerald
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN HEMATOLOGY, 2017, 8 (01) : 3 - 12
  • [7] Considerations for early switch to nilotinib or dasatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia with inadequate response to first-line imatinib
    Quintas-Cardama, Alfonso
    Jabbour, Elias J.
    LEUKEMIA RESEARCH, 2013, 37 (05) : 487 - 495
  • [8] Cost-Utility Analysis of Dasatinib and Nilotinib in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Refractory to First-Line Treatment With Imatinib in Thailand
    Kulpeng, Wantanee
    Sompitak, Sumalai
    Jootar, Saengsuree
    Chansung, Kanchana
    Teerawattananon, Yot
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2014, 36 (04) : 534 - 543
  • [9] Comparative analyses of nilotinib versus high-dose imatinib versus sustained standard-dose imatinib in patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia following suboptimal molecular response to first-line imatinib
    Lee, Sung-Eun
    Choi, Soo-Young
    Kim, Soo-Hyun
    Jootar, Saengsuree
    Kim, Hyeoung-Joon
    Sohn, Sang-Kyun
    Park, Joon Seong
    Kim, Sung-Hyun
    Zang, Dae-Young
    Oh, Suk-Joong
    Kim, Dong-Wook
    LEUKEMIA RESEARCH, 2018, 70 : 100 - 105
  • [10] Cost Effectiveness of Imatinib, Dasatinib, and Nilotinib as First-Line Treatment for Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in China
    Li, Na
    Zheng, Bin
    Cai, Hong-Fu
    Yang, Jing
    Luo, Xiao-Feng
    Weng, Li-Zhu
    Zhan, Feng-Mei
    Liu, Mao-Bai
    CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2018, 38 (01) : 79 - 86