Diagnostic Accuracy of Monofilament Tests for Detecting Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:65
作者
Wang, Fengyi [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Jiaqi [3 ]
Yu, Jiadan [2 ]
Liu, Shaxin [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Rengang [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Xichao [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Yonghong [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Pu [4 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Rehabil Med Ctr, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Sch Med, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Rehabil Sci, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Rui Jin Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
SEMMES-WEINSTEIN MONOFILAMENT; SCREENING-TESTS; PROTECTIVE SENSATION; FOOT; RISK; PREVALENCE; POLYNEUROPATHY; PERFORMANCE; THRESHOLD; MELLITUS;
D O I
10.1155/2017/8787261
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. To systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of monofilament tests for detecting diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Methods. We searched EMBASE (OvidSP), MEDLINE (OvidSP), the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify diagnostic accuracy trials of monofilament tests for detecting diabetic peripheral neuropathy. We used a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics (HSROC) model to conduct the meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of monofilament tests for detecting diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Results. A total of 19 comparative trials met the inclusion criteria and were part of the qualitative synthesis. Eight trials using nerve conduction studies as the reference standard were selected for the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of monofilament tests for detecting diabetic peripheral neuropathy were 0.53 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32 to 0.74) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.94), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 4.56 (95% CI 2.93 to 7.10) and 0.53 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.81), respectively. Conclusions. Our review indicated that monofilament tests had limited sensitivity for screening diabetic peripheral neuropathy. The clinical use of the monofilament test in the evaluation of diabetic peripheral neuropathy cannot be encouraged based on currently available evidence.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[21]   A comparative study of examination scores and quantitative sensory testing in diagnosis of diabetic polyneuropathy [J].
Mythili, A. ;
Kumar, K. Dileep ;
Subrahmanyam, K. A. V. ;
Venkateswarlu, K. ;
Butchi, Raju G. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIABETES IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 2010, 30 (01) :43-48
[22]   4-g monofilament is clinically useful for detecting diabetic peripheral neuropathy [J].
Nagai, Y ;
Sugiyama, Y ;
Abe, T ;
Nomura, G .
DIABETES CARE, 2001, 24 (01) :183-184
[23]  
Najafi Laily, 2014, Acta Med Iran, V52, P519
[24]   Evaluation of three screening tests and a risk assessment model for diagnosing peripheral neuropathy in the diabetes clinic [J].
Olaleye, D ;
Perkins, BA ;
Bril, V .
DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2001, 54 (02) :115-128
[25]  
Paisley AN, 2002, DIABETIC MED, V19, P400
[26]   The assessment of clinical distal symmetric polyneuropathy in type 1 diabetes: A comparison of methodologies from the Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Cohort [J].
Pambianco, G. ;
Costacou, T. ;
Strotmeyer, Elsa ;
Orchard, T. J. .
DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2011, 92 (02) :280-287
[27]   The steel ball-bearing test: a new test for evaluating protective sensation in the diabetic foot [J].
Papanas, N ;
Gries, A ;
Maltezos, E ;
Zick, R .
DIABETOLOGIA, 2006, 49 (04) :739-743
[28]  
Perkins B., 2011, PEDIAT DIABETES, V12
[29]   Simple screening tests for peripheral neuropathy in the diabetes clinic [J].
Perkins, BA ;
Olaleye, D ;
Zinman, B ;
Bril, V .
DIABETES CARE, 2001, 24 (02) :250-256
[30]   Prediction of Incident Diabetic Neuropathy Using the Monofilament Examination A 4-year prospective study [J].
Perkins, Bruce A. ;
Orszag, Andrej ;
Ngo, Mylan ;
Ng, Eduardo ;
New, Patti ;
Bril, Vera .
DIABETES CARE, 2010, 33 (07) :1549-1554