Young children's understanding of animacy and entertainment robots

被引:46
|
作者
Okita, Sandra Y.
Schwartz, Daniel L.
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Cognit & Technol Lab, Psychol Studies Educ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Educ, Psychol Studies Educ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Sch Educ, Learning Sci Technol & Design, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
young children; human-robot interaction; robotic pets; social responses to technology; cognitive psychology; conceptual development; naive theories;
D O I
10.1142/S0219843606000795
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Complex interactions, biologically-inspired features and intelligence are increasingly seen in entertainment robots. Do these features affect how children interpret robots? Children have "animistic intuitions" that they use to attribute intelligence, biology, and agency to living things. Two studies explore whether young children also apply animistic intuitions to robotic animals, and whether attributes vary by the child's age, robot behavior and appearance. A total of ninety-three three- to five-year-olds participated in two experiments. They observed or interacted with robots that exhibited different behaviors and levels of responsiveness to their environment. They then answered simple questions that probed their attributions of biology, intelligence, and agency. The results indicated that regardless of the robots' look and behavior, younger children over-generalized their animistic intuitions about real animals and older children attributed some animistic qualities but not others. One implication is that young children's criteria and attributions do not depend on robot features that are important for older children and adults. Another implication is that children do not have a theory of aliveness, and they develop the category of robot slowly and piecemeal as they learn discrete facts about how technology differs from living things.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 412
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Robot Teachers for Children? Young Children Trust Robots Depending on Their Perceived Accuracy and Agency
    Brink, Kimberly A.
    Wellman, Henry M.
    DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 56 (07) : 1268 - 1277
  • [22] Development of bio-mimetic entertainment dolphin robots
    ETTRC, CNU, Chonnam National University, 300 Yongbong-dong, Buk-gu, Gwangju 500-757, Korea, Republic of
    不详
    WSEAS Trans. Comput., 2008, 10 (1711-1720):
  • [23] Understanding Young Children's Composition Across Three Key Components: Transcription, Connection, and Discourse
    Quinn, Margaret F.
    Rohloff, Rebecca
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN CHILDHOOD EDUCATION, 2025, 39 (01) : 42 - 60
  • [24] Children entertainment in retail stores
    Deli-Gray, Zsuzsa
    Matura, Tamas
    Arva, Laszlo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RETAIL & DISTRIBUTION MANAGEMENT, 2014, 42 (11-12) : 1004 - +
  • [25] WHAT HEALS AND WHY? CHILDREN'S UNDERSTANDING OF MEDICAL TREATMENTS
    Lockhart, Kristi L.
    Keil, Frank C.
    MONOGRAPHS OF THE SOCIETY FOR RESEARCH IN CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 83 (02) : 7 - 174
  • [26] Writing as defamiliarization processes: An alternative approach to understanding aesthetic experience in young children's poetry writing
    Hong, Huili
    JOURNAL OF EARLY CHILDHOOD LITERACY, 2019, 19 (02) : 175 - 205
  • [27] Designing Physical Objects for Young Children's Magnitude Understanding: A TUI Research Through Design Journey
    Besevli, Ceylan
    Goksun, Tilbe
    Ozcan, Oguzhan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 ACM INTERACTION DESIGN AND CHILDREN, IDC 2022, 2022, : 109 - 122
  • [28] Escaping from Children's Abuse of Social Robots
    Brscic, Drazen
    Kidokoro, Hiroyuki
    Suehiro, Yoshitaka
    Kanda, Takayuki
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION (HRI'15), 2015, : 59 - 66
  • [29] YOUNG CHILDREN'S MORAL JUDGMENTS ABOUT PRETEND CRYING: ASSOCIATIONS WITH MENTAL-STATE UNDERSTANDING
    Mizokawa, Ai
    Koyasu, Masuo
    PSYCHOLOGIA, 2013, 56 (04) : 223 - 236
  • [30] The development of children's biological understanding
    Rowlands, M
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL EDUCATION, 2001, 35 (02) : 66 - 68