The Dialectical Systems Theory's Capacity for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making

被引:17
作者
Cancer, Vesna [1 ]
Mulej, Matjaz [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maribor, Fac Econ & Business, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia
关键词
decision analysis; dialectical systems theory; informal systemic thinking; multi-criteria decision-making; requisite holism; THINKING; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1002/sres.1016
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The article introduces the Quantified Dialectical Systems Theory (DST), which is one of the cases of new systems theories. It arises from the need for the appropriate knowledge about the basics of both systems theory and the applied computer supported qualitative and quantitative methods that can help individuals or groups in researching important complex decision-making problems; among them we emphasize the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) ones. Moreover, the article presents the framework procedure for MCDM, based on assigning weights, which we developed by following the original procedures of several MCDM methods, adapted mainly by the conclusions of experts in practice regarding the suitability of different multi-criteria methods, and own experience. We demonstrate how the DST's guidelines defining the subjective starting points can be followed when approaching MCDM problems step-by-step, as well as the DST's guidelines concerning implementation of starting points. In the efforts to support creating and decision-making it helps a lot, if the application of theory can take place in an informal style. This article introduces ways of incorporation of informal systemic thinking and the DST's guidelines in the framework procedure for MCDM when solving several real-life complex problems, presented by example cases. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 300
页数:16
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Ackermann F., 2001, RATIONAL ANAL PROBLE, P43
[2]   Decision Support Systems in action:: Integrated application in a multicriteria decision aid process [J].
Bana E Costa, CA ;
Ensslin, L ;
Corrêa, ÉC ;
Vansnick, JC .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1999, 113 (02) :315-335
[3]  
Bastic M, 2005, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Operational Research - KOI 2004, P65
[4]  
BELTON V, 1997, J MULTICRITERIA DECI, V6, P116
[5]  
Belton V., 2002, MULIPLE CRITERIA DEC
[6]  
BERTALANFFY L, 1979, GEN SYSTEMS THEORY F
[7]  
Bouyssou DT., 2000, Evaluation and Decision Model. A Critical Perspective
[8]  
Brown RV, 2006, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V1, P162
[9]   Why and how to evaluate the creditworthiness of SMEs' business partners [J].
Cancer, V ;
Knez-Riedl, J .
INTERNATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS JOURNAL-RESEARCHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2005, 23 (02) :143-162
[10]  
CANCER V, 2003, ANALIZA ODLOCANJA IZ