Students' and teachers' perceived teaching presence in online courses

被引:21
作者
Wang, Yang [1 ]
Stein, David [2 ]
Shen, Shusheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Normal Univ, Sch Educ Sci, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Ohio State Univ, Coll Educ & Human Ecol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
community of inquiry; online course; teaching and learning; teaching presence; PERCEPTIONS; FEEDBACK; PERSPECTIVES; COMMUNITY; LEARNERS; INQUIRY;
D O I
10.1080/01587919.2021.1956304
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Differences in how students and teachers understand online teaching presence play a key role in teaching design. To explore how students and teachers perceive teaching presence, this study surveyed 1,041 students and 18 teachers who participated in an online course at a Chinese university. The analysis found students' perceived teaching presence was significantly lower than the teachers', particularly in terms of facilitating discourse (p < .001). Regarding the perceived importance of the five dimensions of teaching presence (Wang et al., 2019), students perceived facilitating discourse to be more important than direct instruction, while the opposite was found to be true for teachers. The divergence creates a challenge for teachers in engaging students in learning. The results indicate that teachers could pay more attention to the following dimensions to improve students' learning experience: making macro-level comments on courses, designing instructional methods, providing formative feedback for homework and discussions, and making full use of technological tools in teaching.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 390
页数:18
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Gaining insight from survey data: an analysis of the community of inquiry survey using Rasch measurement techniques [J].
Abbitt, Jason T. ;
Boone, William J. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2021, 33 (02) :367-397
[2]  
Aykol Z., 2008, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, V12, P3, DOI DOI 10.24059/OLJ.V12I3.72
[3]   Interaction and presence in the virtual classroom: An analysis of the perceptions of students and teachers in online and blended Advanced Placement courses [J].
Blaine, Andrew M. .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2019, 132 :31-43
[4]  
Bruner J., 1996, The culture of education
[5]   A literature review: efficacy of online learning courses for higher education institution using meta-analysis [J].
Castro, Mayleen Dorcas B. ;
Tumibay, Gilbert M. .
EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2021, 26 (02) :1367-1385
[6]  
Cohen J, 1992, Curr Dir Psychol Sci, V1, P98, DOI DOI 10.1111/1467-8721.EP10768783
[7]  
Cole AW, 2017, ONLINE LEARN, V21, P245
[8]  
DeNoyelles A, 2014, J ONLINE LEARNING TE, V10, P153
[9]   Measuring teachers and learners' perceptions of the quality of their online learning experience [J].
Gomez-Rey, Pilar ;
Barbera, Elena ;
Fernandez-Navarro, Francisco .
DISTANCE EDUCATION, 2016, 37 (02) :146-163
[10]   Preparing learners to self-explain video examples: Text or video introduction? [J].
Hefter, Markus H. ;
Berthold, Kirsten .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2020, 110